Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hayden: Obama Does not wish to investigate waterboarding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:48 AM
Original message
Hayden: Obama Does not wish to investigate waterboarding
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 01:48 AM by Hell_If_I_Know
Damn. :(

Inquiry Into Interrogations Unlikely
Hayden: Obama Does Not Wish to Investigate Waterboarding

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011504009.html

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 16, 2009; Page A17

President-elect Barack Obama has privately signaled to top U.S. intelligence officials that he has no plans to launch a legal inquiry into the CIA's past use of waterboarding and other harsh interrogation techniques, agency director Michael V. Hayden said yesterday.

Obama learned key details of the CIA's interrogation practices in a closed-door meeting last month, and afterward made clear that he was more interested in protecting the country from terrorist attacks than investigating the past, the outgoing CIA director said.

"He's looking forward," Hayden said, "and that's very appropriate."

The retired Air Force general made the comment at a farewell news conference at which he strongly defended the agency's role in the controversial program -- a role that he said was accepted "out of duty, and not with enthusiasm."

He also highlighted what he described as "remarkable" CIA successes in recent months in disrupting al-Qaeda's operations in the Middle East and South Asia, while also warning of serious challenges awaiting his successor. The list of threats ranged from the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran -- perhaps within Obama's term -- to the risk of a Mumbai-style terrorist attack on a U.S. city.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. What. The. Fuck.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he's lying.
Wheres my old washtub, I'll get to the bottom of this.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He said the same thing Obama told George S on ABC, is what he told him
so, that's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know,
he would implicate too many of our finest leaders like Reid and Pelosi.

That is why he can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Bingo. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama may not have a choice. Apparently it violates a treaty signed by the U.S.
whereby we pledged to prosecute anyone that tortures. A federal judge ruled flat-out that we tortured at Guantanamo. I was under the impression Junior had broken all treaties including opting out of the International Court from the onset, and I need to research this.

Rachel talked about this tonight. If indeed this is true, I'd be hard-pressed to believe that Obama would violate a treaty. And this may be all that is needed to grease the skids towards justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's CIA Director Hayden Hidin'? by Ray McGovern
What's CIA Director Hayden Hidin'?

By Ray McGovern
January 15, 2009


Outgoing CIA Director Michael Hayden is going around town telling folks he has warned President-elect Barack Obama “personally and forcefully” that if Obama authorizes an investigation into controversial activities like waterboarding, “no one in Langley will ever take a risk again.”



http://www.consortiumnews.com/2009/011509b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, for real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Waterboarding is torture. Period.
I'm getting pretty sick of the wingnuts staying unequivocally with a straight face that it's okay under certain circumstances. Bullshit. It is and has always been illegal.

Obama and Holder have knocked that shit back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Hayden is running scared
and doing and saying anything he can to anybody who will listen to try to scare people away from investigating the torture. Too bad for him. If Obama can go after the top brass, without hurting the operatives following orders, I think he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. Ding ding ding.......Absolutely hiding!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. GOOD!!!!
I'm tired of Langley "taking risks" with OUR democracy.
I think this is a wonderful idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Cry me a little river for the poor spooks at Langley. I want to here what O has to say 1/21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Obama is the President not a Prosecutor
There is a reason for Judiciary Committees in the Legislative Branch and there is a reason for the Department of Justice in the Judicial Branch. If they do their job, it will be investigated. I don't understand why people think Obama must give an OK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. Department of Justice is part of the Executive Branch, not Judicial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was I the only one who read the thread headline and thought it was TOM Hayden they were quoting?
That would have made it even more disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. He can appoint someone else to do it then.
Nobody expects him to micromanage. His new AG can do it. Set up a special commission. No pukes allowed!

It must be done though, or this country has no rule of law, and is therefore no better than a third world shit-hole run by a dictator.

Can we get the Writ of Habeas corpus back too, or shall we go on living in the thirteenth century? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Don't you love it when the CIA Director says what's appropriate for a President and what's not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hayden doesn't think the public has a right to know
what is done in their name. He opposed the release of the CIA 9/11 IG report executive summary claiming it would distract CIA from their mission. He never explained his bizarre conduct at the NSA in the lead up to 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. he can look forward all he wants as long as he goes after this
criminal administration.

if he doesn't have the spine to do it then i hope several international communities come in and do it for him and embarrass the shit out of him for not helping to clean up our own mess and preserve our constitution and the oath he will swear to "uphold" it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. Part of proving we're not a nation that tortures
Is prosecuting those that allowed it to go on. I guess we should have just told the Nazis at Nuremberg that they better "Just not let it happen again"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. did ya'll ever thing
that they just don't want to telegraph their intention till after he's president? My thinking is, he wants bush to think that he's not going to go after them so bush won't pardon anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. His Atty General just testified that he wouldn't recognize such a pardon
So what are we waiting for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Maybe this is a case of Hayden trying to get out in front of the issue
by setting up Obama when in fact it's not Obama who should do the prosecuting but his Justice Department. :shrug: Hayden is that guy who wears his military uniform ...which used to be against the rules in Government unless one is on active duty, if I remember correctly.

He's probably shaking in his boots wondering if he is a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. wishful thinking on hayden's part
'remarkable cia successes'

yea, sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. He might want to consider starting getting interested in investigations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Is Hayden playing a game for public persuation, jumping to conclusions based on previous
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 09:20 AM by mmonk
statements, or working on Obama to protect him and other international criminals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. And after I parked my pretty unicorn
along side the lake where rainbow fish were jumping I got to thinking. Obama has a crap load on his plate. During his campaign, he constantly reinforced the need to move forward. You see this is nasty horrid relationships all the time. Unless you can put some things behind you it's the past the eats you up, not the job ahead.

I really don't think it's wise to take on the job of dealing with the past when the future lives of billions is calling for a reprieve. I honestly think that time, energy, recourse aright now are better used looking ahead to address the dire straights that has become the US financial systems and the threats of terrorism.

While I honestly hope at some point, Obama's energies and efforts can eventually be splintered in many more directions (including Cheney et al)...right now, the more pressing issue is not dredging up and attempting to prosecute the past misdeeds of a few, but in addressing the future needs of the many. I'll bet you all are going to start calling me a troll, because it seems the majority would prefer the resources and energy and time be spent on prosecution immediately.

Those guys and their atrocities are not going anywhere. At least once I wander back over to my pretty unicorn, that has actually turned out to be a Ford Pinto, I'd rather I'd be given some hope that there is a reason to move forward and try just that much harder rather than slap around some mealy face, lying, schlep who will drag this out with the best attorneys available and have already destroyed as much evidence as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Unless we face and prosecute the traitors we assume their stain. That is the problem with the
"Forward looking" push. AS of now the crimes belong to the Neo-Convicts and little boots. IF we do not allow the prosecutors to do their jobs the crimes become ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You must have mistaken
your assumption that I said "NO" to prosecution, for "let's prosecute when more important matters are under control". Revenge to the exclusion or detriment of more important issues will serve no one and nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Returning the country to the RULE OF LAW is not revenge. It is required if we are to
have any claim of national honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. The criminality is connected
The WoT was used to loot the treasury. NSA used to spy on important people to keep them in line. Torture used to attain desired answers.

Would you truly have us believe the Bush crowd acted in good faith? That is the justification for all this illegal police state bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Let him keep thinking this until the cuffs are on him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. Um, I don't believe anything Hayden says.
I'd like to know how Obama "privately signaled" - how exactly does that work? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. A wink and a nod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. ...the same way that it worked when Ms. Clinton said that she was given an offer
to be SoS when no such thing had taken place yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. US torture caused more recruits to Al Qaeda
If Obama does nothing about the perpetrators, he sends the message that he's no different than Bush.

Al Qaeda flourishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC