Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neocons are starting their "we could've won, but the liberals ruined it" a little too early.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:32 PM
Original message
Neocons are starting their "we could've won, but the liberals ruined it" a little too early.
Was anyone else reminded of Vietnam rhetoric while watching David Frum offering his evaluation of Iraq?

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/24/whats-the-answer-in-iraq-david/

For years, I've heard similarly pampered idiots talk about how we 'could've won in Vietnam' if we'd only been willing to sacrifice a few thousand more soldiers. He's already setting that up- but it's just laughable. GW Bush has still received *EVERYTHING* he's asked for up to this point, and it's only gotten worse from the outset.

Why are people like Frum still offered a public forum, while people who were against this lunacy from the outset, and described exactly what would happen, are still largely excluded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had four years to win but they were too incompetent
to do so. Remind them US won WWII is less time.

Iraq had no army, no modern weapons, no leadership to speak of.
So US in Iraq couldn't win against its own incompetence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope no one is surprised by this
These are after all the ACTUAL SAME people who made the same claims after they blew it in Vietnam, and some of these crooks have admitted that Bushco's new wars are an attempt to get it right this time.

In fact, in Woodward's latest book, Rumsfeld is told exactly that, to 'get it right this time'.

You know what? Blame ME for the withdrawal. I can live with saving the life of thousands while 'costing' America a 'victory' in a meaningless act of aggression. Democrats are bigger cowards than I thought if we give two shits about this argument. They should just call the attempt at guilt trips a 'repeat of Vietnam' and just say it over and over again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. If only a few thousand more chickenhawks,neocons, and freepers
had just enlisted in the army, we would have won by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. The neo-cons & republicans didn't enlist in sufficient numbers to win their war
nor could they stomach paying for their war. Nor were they willing to stop the war industry corruption that left troops ill-equiped. How did they expect to win a war they weren't willing to fight or to pay for, or provide proper oversight for? Talk about a lack of will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, thats the point to make....
They didn't enlist and they didn't support the war effort by paying enough to have a well-trained and well-equipt army.

They lost the war without any assistance from anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Well said. I'm going to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Idiocy
No outside power has ever been able to win a war against indigenous guerrillas. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I've been thinking about this.. I think the US Civil War is a contrary example, but kind
of a unique situation. I think Rome occupied some areas for a long time. There may be other examples, but in general you are right, even with a greatly superior power (economy/technology) doing the occupying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Civil War was army against army
in set-piece battles like Gettysburg, a pretty traditional style of symmetrical warfare. I don't think the Confederates could be considered guerrillas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. No but it did represent an occupation of a hostile South by the North, and there were
guerilla elements like Mosby's raiders, you might even classify Nathan Bedford Forrest that way. And the occupation was ultimately successful in that the will of the occupied was crushed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's only the 29% who would believe it and F*%! them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, but they would need to know what the fuck was going on
to know they didn't screw it up.

Just another case of the blind leading the blind, being pushed by the insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. The same line was offered by the NSDAP in 1919.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Come on, Frum's view of Vietnam was proven right...
in the movie "Rambo" and the movie "Uncommon Valor" and numerous Chuck Norris movies whose titles escape me at the moment. Like Frum I was too young for Vietnam, but I did see John Wayne's "The Green Berets". The Duke was kicking ass! Geez, I don't know where you people learned your history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Heh! John Wayne.
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 07:33 PM by gatorboy
The all Amercian tough guy that didn't find the time to join himself. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Isn't that a shock?
I almost see a pattern here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. We knew they would blame everyone else for their messes.
This is only the beginning of the blame game for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. We wouldn't be strapped down to their . . . "Triumph of the Will". . bullcrap
"If only they'd believed"

Sweet Jesus what a bunch of miserable bloodthirsty miscreants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC