Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ancient Clovis Toolbox: Were Prehistoric Nomads DIYers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:10 AM
Original message
Ancient Clovis Toolbox: Were Prehistoric Nomads DIYers?
Source: Popular Mechanics

I know this has been posted on recently, but this article seems to have more info, and I like the photo :D



(Photograph by Glenn J. Asakawa/University of Colorado)

Last May, when Patrick Mahaffy was digging in his yard in Boulder, Colo., his shovel struck archaeological gold—a cache of 83 shaped stones that turned out to be prehistoric tools. The tools dates back 13,000 years to the prehistoric Clovis people, according to Douglas Bamforth, a University of Colorado professor who spent nine months testing and studying the tools. Bamforth presented the find to an archaeological conference in the fall. (He announced the find to the general public last month.) His team used protein residue analysis to identify materials from camels and horses, creatures that disappeared from the American continent at the end of the last ice age. Bamforth's team dated the tools back to the Clovis people, who archaeologists believe were the first or among the first people to cross the Bering Land Bridge and occupy North America. According to Bamforth these early Americans weren't just wandering souls—the Boulder find is further evidence, like the cache of Clovis spear points in East Wenatchee, Wash., that they might have been America's first toolmakers too.

The gems of the Boulder cache are bifacial knives, carefully crafted, with two sharp edges. Others pieces are shards that probably broke off while people were carving those knives, he says, but whose sharp edges made them useful for finer cuts. Bamforth told PM that Clovis people would have used spearheads to slaughter the megafauna—like the woolly mammoth—that roamed ancient America; these knives were for butchering the animals. "They're not weapons," he says. "They're processing tools."

The Clovis tools display remarkable craftsmanship. One of the oddest pieces of the bunch looks to be a double-sided axe—but with no place for a handle. Bamforth says that if you hold the axe by its middle, it feels balanced and useful as is. The majority of the Boulder knives are made from a sedimentary rock called tiger chert, which Clovis people would have been able to sculpt in several ways. Earlier peoples would have used a hard material like quartzite to hammer the chert into the correct shape, he says. But later on, more sophisticated toolmakers of the era learned to use materials such as antlers to make gentler changes of shape.

One mystery surrounding the Clovis people is that after going to all the trouble to make these tools, they often bury them together in the ground. One of the team's initial hypotheses was ritual. Previous Clovis sites have turned up giant spearheads far too large for a person to use during a hunt, Bamforth says, but these Colorado tools are more pragmatically sized. His hypothesis for the burial is insurance—people hid their tools in the ground so they could find them later if they followed a herd of animals back to the same area. David Kilby, an anthropology professor and Clovis expert from Eastern New Mexico University, told PM that he agreed with Bamforth's interpretation. "Stone is essential for hunter-gatherers who don't use metal," Kilby says. "To be caught without it is to be caught in a bad position."

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4307990.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, I think they bought all of their shit from Target. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah...it is apparent that the titles lack...uh...insight on some of these articles
Edited on Wed Mar-11-09 12:19 AM by Adsos Letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cool!
I like the hypothesis that early people buried stone caches for later use.

I can imagine a bunch of people sitting around during the winter or non-hunting season and making a few pounds of stone tools, then buying them and making a cairn or other marking so that later people would find the tools. :)

PS I thought chert was metamorphic? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Caching valuable tools was probably essential for stone age people
Think of trying to lug that group of tools around - what they show probably weighs 20 or so pounds!

If the Clovis people were nomadic hunter-gatherers, they may have only needed that assemblage of tools at a certain time of year in that area. Say, for the fall buffalo hunt, since it looks like there are spear points, scrapers and cutting tools. They may have had other assemblages of tools for other activities in other areas for whatever foods or materials they would have processed there.

And I always wonder why they were left - maybe the few individuals that cached them were killed in a hunt or died from disease. Or maybe they found a superior quality of material to make new tools from and just abandoned those old ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe they lost their map. Or traded their jacket forgetting about the map
burned into the pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Does it say "Made in China" on it?
Just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC