Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Mexico Stealth Creationism Bill Dies, No One Mourns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:04 PM
Original message
New Mexico Stealth Creationism Bill Dies, No One Mourns
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/33138_New_Mexico_Stealth_Creationism_Bill_Dies_No_One_Mourns#rss

New Mexico Stealth Creationism Bill Dies, No One Mourns
Sci/Tech | Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:23:35 pm PDT

As we’ve noted previously, New Mexico is one of several states in which Republican politicians have introduced bills intended to sneak the teaching of creationism into science classes, under the deceptive mantle of “academic freedom.” This multi-state effort is based on a Discovery Institute “model bill,” and many of the bills simply copy and paste the language from the Discovery Institute version.

Dave Thomas at Panda’s Thumb reports that the New Mexico bill has now died without ever being heard by committee, an ignominious end to a dishonest piece of creationist legislation: Another Discovery Institute Bill Fails...

Thomas also points out the promotional website used by New Mexico anti-evolutionists: Origins Education.

The site features a picture of an orangutan holding a sign (get it?), and one of those deceptive, out-of-context quotes that creationists dearly love, attempting to make it seem as if Charles Darwin himself doubted the truth of evolution in The Origin of Species:

"For I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived. A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question; and this is here impossible."

The complete quote, in context, shows that Darwin’s real point was that he couldn’t list all the facts that support the theory of evolution, in an abstract of what was intended to be a much larger work.

"This Abstract, which I now publish, must necessarily be imperfect. I cannot here give references and authorities for my several statements; and I must trust to the reader reposing some confidence in my accuracy. No doubt errors will have crept in, though I hope I have always been cautious in trusting to good authorities alone. I can here give only the general conclusions at which I have arrived, with a few facts in illustration, but which, I hope, in most cases will suffice. No one can feel more sensible than I do of the necessity of hereafter publishing in detail all the facts, with references, on which my conclusions have been grounded; and I hope in a future work to do this. For I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived. A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question; and this is here impossible."

Once again, we see that creationists are completely shameless about lying to promote their pseudo-scientific hooey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure that one more evolution of the bill will find a better environment for its survival. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. NM is an intensely weird state
and had it sneaked by, say, in an appropriations bill, the teachers would have created an uproar over it and it wouldn't have lasted long.

A religious majority (Christian) was pushing itself onto a religious minority (tribal people) up until the late 60s and the memories are still fresh and raw. People here are very sensitive to that sort of thing.

In addition, the state has a large scientific community and there's no way they'd stand for such nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC