Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton says administration will not attempt to revive the assault weapons ban.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:42 PM
Original message
Clinton says administration will not attempt to revive the assault weapons ban.
Andrea Mitchell just said this on Rachel Maddow's show. She said the administration didn't want to take on the gun lobby.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hurray! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is that something the SoS would be concerned with?
The AG, the DOJ, or the ATF I could understand, but thats not really in her job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think it was in relation to the current trip to Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
89. I assume that she asked about the administration policy because it is related to the trouble in
Mexico. Had she not been told the policy, it would have left her in the position of appearing out of the loop when the questions were asked on what the US will do to halt the flow of weapons into Mexico. In addition, HRC is a cabinet member and sits at cabinet meetings. One reason is to know what the rest of the administration is doing.

I am NOT a HRC fan, but she is not to blame for this policy. The only way she could be faulted is if this is not true or the administration had not made a decision. This is highly unlikely as Obama and everyone else knows that this is a major issue that would come up with Mexico - so there is no way they would not have told her the policy the WH wants to take.

(That said - I am disappointed with that decision - in fact, given the problems in Mexico, there is MORE reason to control those weapons.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yessss!!!!!
4 more years, almost guaranteed!!!!

I don't care if y'all don't like it...the assault weapons ban was a Pollyanna feel good worthless piece of shit legislation and should NEVER be resurrected.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. All those fools running out spending their money on guns
Dumbasses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Pretty good investment actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not at the inflated prices they've been selling for recently
In my area a lot of fools and their money have been parted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's why I bought mine last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Good for you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
84. I told the guys I work with that went out and bought a gun out of fear
I would buy it from them for 50 cents on the dollar in a year from them after they realized they were suckered by the fearmongering gun lobby.
I"m gonna get me some smokin deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. Why wouldn't they just keep it? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #87
105. Most of them went out of their ways to buy guns they really
didn't need or could afford. With the ecomony looking bad the guys are always willing to part with toys at a pretty good discount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
88. Not really
They get to keep the guns. That's a plus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
107. My rifle has appreciated 58% since 2003,
and the ammunition I own has appreciated more than 100%. How's your stock portfolio doing these days?

I don't own guns as an investment, but they are not a bad investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Woo hoo!!
Good sense has prevailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. In this environment it would not work , we need to find a
a way to deal with arms dealers. The people who smuggle guns are worse than the drug dealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. If legal dealers in this country are in fact the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I could be reading the post you replied to incorrectly
But it would appear they're speaking of illegal arms dealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. They seem to be blaming licensed dealers in the US for selling to straw purchasers.
Of course they dismissed the last case against one of them. Mexico also won't release the serial numbers of these gun to confirm they were purchased in the US.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. But, but, but, but what about all those assault rifles being smuggled into Mexico???
:rofl:

Thanks Gaawwd Obama didn't fall for that bullshit!

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They are, but that's ok
What shocks me is how ignorant people still choose to be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Because they say so right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No, from that place I choose to live in called reality
and the weapons didn't start flowing south a year ago either, or two either.

That just accelerated

Go search the web son even learn some spanish and read the Mexican press, or if you don't believe them, maybe the european press

Suffice it to say some of the shit that was found even many years ago was quite surprising

Of course you'd not take a first hand witness testimony either as to some of this shit either so why bother

Those who are willfully ignorant, cannot be led to water

And Dave, you are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I guess we should just believe everything the government and Fox News says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. My own lying eyes work
due to where I worked I got to see it

Even experience the cross country fire...

that's the part of first hand witness you are missing

Son

And how about Televisa? Canadian News Network? The BBC...

Something about rivers and making noise and carrying water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Just because your kids suck don't claim me as one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. As I said, you will even discount a first hand witness
to that crap

Don't worry, the American News Media did that for years....

You are not alone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. You never do that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I believe rational people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yep, that is why the INS officer and I had a chuckle years ago
as they tore apart a car full of dope, local news filming, while their counterparts tore up a car with assault weapons...

We just looked at each other, perhaps if we got these idiots to film that some dot connecting may occur

As I said, this didn't start today

And I consider you far from rational when it comes to this subject SON...

Of course there were some toys that the Army found that could only come from the US... armory, but that is another story

Didn't start yesterday son, just accelerated son

Now I have better things to do than argue with a horse that can be led to water, but would never drink from it, even if he died from thirst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Full of AK-47's huh. Sure it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. According to their counterparts they had that day
2 cuernos de chivo (AK)

1 AR-15

1 SKS

As well as a couple escuadras in 9mm ... no make determined, but the mexican press usually doesn't specify them

So yes they were

Recent stories place the thing at less weapons but more cars

So how's that for you?

As to what the army captured from one of the cartels even years ago... some of it came only from US armories...

Google mexican press, they do show what they capture regularly, on the teevee machine... and photos of them in the paper

I am sure you can use the google.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I saw some today, 3 very dangerous over and under shotguns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. It's been fun I'll catch up with you tomorrow. I've got a class to teach tomorrow and need sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Could be becuz they don't live in a border town!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. You got it, brother\sister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. So you see people smuggling AK-47's, RPG's and grenades?
I guess they bought them at gun shows huh.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. YES to all those questions
And not necessarily at gun shows for some items, but I am sure you knew that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. That's hysterical you actually believe they are smuggling RPG's from the US. You are delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. I know you are making things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Ready for some crow son? Here you go, hope your spanish is good
This is a haul recently taken

That trooper is part of the Special Forces detachment



http://www.ultimadelatanda.com/2008/11/ejrcito-mexicano-decomisa-el-mayor.html

http://www.libertaddigital.com/mundo/mexico-decomisa-al-cartel-del-golfo-el-mayor-arsenal-de-armas-de-la-historia-1276343037/

Entre las armas aprehendidas hay siete rifles Barret calibre 50 milímetros, armamento de gran poder capaz de penetrar cualquier blindaje de automóvil y con un alcance de 6.800 metros. Además, se incautaron 287 granadas, entre ellas 98 de 40 mm., 165 de mano defensivas, 2 cilíndricas, 3 granadas de mano de humo, 3 aturdidoras y 16 de gas. También hay fusiles de asalto AK-47, armas cortas con los mangos bañados en oro, dos lanzagranadas, 14 cartuchos de dinamita, 67 chalecos antibalas, y 970.300 pesos (unos 75.000 dólares) y 86.740 dólares en efectivo.


Need me to translate oh shit I will

Among the captured weapons are seven Barrett Fifty caliber,... 287 grneades AK -47 Two RPGS, 14 tnt sticks, 67 armored vests,

Them the highlights son
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Now if you could prove that those came from the US you might have something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Where do you think the barrets came from?
And yes, the ATF has run numbers many a times

The STORIES you believe to believe, that 90 % of them are coming from the STATES should clue you in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. The Barrett's likely came from the US. You're insane if you think the RPG's did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. can you do math? 90% is not 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. You said you had seen RPG's being smuggled in from the US though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. That time I saw it... they were not the usual stuff
according to the folks at the federal police

I also saw some shit that most people would not believe. They make the RPGs look like toys, regardless of where they come from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. You might have a future as a writer.
You actually expect me to believe that you have seen weapons being smuggled that make the RPG's that are destroying M1A1's in Iraq look like toys. MMMkay.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. And US Made too... they came from an armory somewhere
Yep, we all had one of those... HOLEEEE SHIT MOMENTS

After all, you are right, nobody would misplace weapons in a US Armory

NO Sireee, nobody would...and that has never, ever happened... nope... not at all... black projects, cough, cough... but that would never happen

I know what I saw...

And I truly envy your sheltered life...

Lord I really do

Though that one it probably started at a US Armory... and came the long way...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #80
90. Then you're not talking about weapons that started in the civilian market.
All these news stories use this "90% of drug cartels' weapons come from the USA" blurb, but they don't go on to explain whether the source is the US civilian market, or other. The automatic weapons, grenades, rocket launchers and what-not, i.e. military ordnance, are NOT coming from the US civilian market, and yet it seems these are the weapons the politicians, journalists, and you are most concerned about.

If the stuff that's really causing concern is military in origin, then its probably stuff we've sold to Mexican military and law enforcement which has 'made its way' into the possession of the cartels. There are also international black market channels through which American military ordnance can be obtained (i.e. Vietnam, where we left TONS of rifles, grenades, ammo, etc. behind). All of this stuff 'started out in the USA' but that doesn't mean the American civilian market has anything to do with it, and more civilian gun control wouldn't do anything to curb it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #90
95. That particular one didn't, the rest did
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 09:55 AM by nadinbrzezinski
By the way that particular one would make RPGs look like a walk in the damn, I stand by that

HOLLEEE SHIT

FINDERS KEEPERS

The Barretts did, oh and now that I think about that one, did start in the civilian market, when it entered the black weapons market, and in that particular case not the US... but can you understand the meaning of PARTICULAR

No you can't

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. Barrett's aren't assault rifles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Like those russian grenades you learned about in the school of hard knocks.
You ever think of writing a book that's some funny shit. Especially the part about the english words on the russian grenades.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
83. Yeah but it was written in a Russian accent
Eef you pullz zis peen, moose and skwerel go boom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #42
76. Process to get an AK-47 in the United States. For those who care about the TRUTH.
"Process for obtaining a Class 3, Title 2 or NFA Weapon
The transfer tax on machine guns, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns, and suppressors is $200 payable to the BATFE. The transfer tax on AOWs is $5 and is also payable to the BATFE. This transfer tax is a one time only tax and not an annual tax. Each time an NFA weapon changes hands, the tax is charged except if the transfer is between class 3 dealers.
The paperwork required for the transfer of an NFA weapon consists of an application known as the Form 4. The Form 4 is completed and submitted with the applicant's photograph attached and a fingerprint card. These are submitted the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in duplicate along with the respective transfer tax. The finger print cards are forwarded to the FBI for a background check. The background check and transfer process takes about 2 months or so depending on the examiners’ work load and if there are any errors on the preparers part.
Once the Form 4 application is approved, one copy of the approved application with a "stamp" is sent back to the dealer or seller of the weapon. The dealer or seller contacts the buyer and makes the physical transfer of the weapon at that time. The approved Form 4 application stays with the weapon and is proof that the buyer has paid the transfer tax. The original should be stored in a safe place and a photocopy carried with the weapon should the legality of the NFA weapon be questioned by law enforcement officers."

The importation of AK-47's has been illegal since 1968.

The domestic manufacture of AK-47's has been illegal since 1986.


You would have us believe that 90% of these AK47's are being smuggled in from the US.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. As I explained, from that pesky thing called history
for the moment... this is not set in stone

And perhaps not this group, but you will see some kind of controls, that will follow US History, not legend... sooner or later

That is all...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. We have all kinds of controls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. And guess what, they fit a historic pattern son
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Listen up kid. You couldn't shine my dad's shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I'm sure son
you live in small town america, away from borders, where this is happening

Try to open your eyes... to some reality

And by the way, you are infatuated with weapons... lord knows you have a right

Have a good life sonny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Just because your kids suck don't claim me as one. I know you like me and all but seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. You see my dad actually was a veteran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. I am a veteran of the war on drugs, and my husband is a retired chief
and your point?

Free clue, we both have been shot at, and he fired in anger...

You don't impress me that much

Especially since you lack that intellectual curiosity son
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. That explains a lot thanks.
Nothing like a man's wife to tell me all the things her husband has seen.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. No you idiot what I HAVE SEEN with my own eyes
what part of VETERAN of the war on drugs are you missing?

I've been the one shot at YOU IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!



You see, I actually saw things that you can only imagine

or are unable to comprehend...

Or willfully ignorant to

Free hint... what do you want to know that actually happened in the Movie Traffic that was changed to protect the guilty?

Clue, about ten percent

I had a front row seat to that

His war were Granada, Gulf War One and Two

Mine was the war on drugs, clear enough son?

And you still fail to impress me

In fact, my opinion of you is now lower than whale shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Clearly you are upset. My apologies, I'm just having a fun debate. Take care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. UPSET, are you that delusional
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 12:07 AM by nadinbrzezinski
amazed at willful ignorance maybe... but upset?

That's a good one

Thanks for the laugh

By the way, you were shown data... don't expect you to accept it

Goes against everything you believe

Oh and just because I have cooties does not mean I haven't been there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. You haven't shown me one bit of data and you are clearly upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Ok doctor freud
the arsenal captured by the army is nothing... and of course I'm upset

Are we seeing some projection here?

Look fact is don't matter what you are shown, weapons cannot be flowing from the US to mexico, no matter who or what data is shown to you

And of course things are not that bad down there

And we all should be able to own an M-1 battle-tank.. parking it will be a bitch, let alone the fuel cost....

That's the truth....

No matter what you are shown, because you are stuck in a story, and all this (what is going on for real, in the real world, actually violates what you believe in)

Here is a shocker for you... part of the solution to this involves something our government will not do... legalize the crap, all of it, and tax it, heavily so

Now you need to go teach a class... me... well in the real world I know what I;ve seen, and what I've experienced and it is very far from what you, in a safe firehouse in the US, has experienced... consider yourself lucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. Pictures aren't data you realize that don't you.
Newspaper stories aren't data either. A random Mexican or US government official making a statement isn't data either. The things that you claim to have seen are merely anecdote or fantasy.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. Now we enter into the realm of fantasy... RLOL
now if that was one story... you'd have a case

But these arsenals captured by the Mexican Army have a twenty year history... AT LEAST

Why don't you try the google.

Be curious

Oh and for historians primary sources include witnesses... in case you wonder

As I said, this whole story goes against your personal believes. Now go to sleep you have a class to teach... I'm sure you want to be in a good mood, perhaps

Oh and david, believe whatever you want to believe...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Again NO DATA, nothing to back up these stories you make up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #75
77. Ready for some more crow?
http://www.seattlepi.com/national/401827_mexico28.html

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ae0f349b5a2797fa94e4da7f5022104f

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/world/americas/26mexico.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

Notice the date on the second one, 2007

Will give you more tomorrow

And sadly I hope you can read spanish

Though you could do this google yourself...

If you were truly curious

As to my claims, sorry... I didn't go to the press... just know what I saw, including getting shot at... more than once

So whether you believe that or not, matters little to me.

But you are willfully ignorant... on the bright side... you are not unlike most citizens of the US... where myth replaces the ugly reality

For those of us on the border... well it is another story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #77
86. Only one of the three articles you cited had any data.
The ATF says they traced over 10,000 guns since 2005 back to the United States. See that's some data, something that would be independently verifiable, unlike the claims of the mexican government or estimates from the Brooking's Institution. I would like to see the numbers of prosecutions associated with those 10,000 illegal gun sales they were able to trace. Hopefully a reporter will actually do their job and use FOIA to get the ATF to release this information so it can be independently verified. I'll do some research on it and get back to you.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #75
93. Here are numbers for one week from Janet Napolitano on weapons seized
She is head of Homeland Security - so this is as official as it gets.

Here's what she says (about 31 minutes in):

Napolitano then gave a description of the violence saying that the scope of has changed drastically in magnitude. Because Mexico and the US are working to stop the drug trade which has led to the cartels fighting each other in turf battles. She said that there is a different level - 6000 homicides in Northern states of Mexico - 550 of law enforcement or public official. Napolitano said the majority of weapons come from the US. She mentioned that 997 firearms were seized between March 7 and 13th. This was with 4 and a half million dollars in cash.

http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Hearings.Detail&HearingID=c90839b0-9167-4819-b943-332988b403b1

Interesting note - Lieberman DOES see need to deal with firearms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #93
94. That's guv'ment making those claims
I don't think it will matter to him, but thank you anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #94
97. I was just listening to the hearing and having read your comments
which were convincing to me - even though I took French years ago in college rather than Spanish.

I agree that he won't believe it - but I thought others reading the thread might be interested in the stats she mentioned.

Later in the questioning, she says they don't think they need changes in the law - referring to two (I think sensible) Lieberman suggestions - 1) on weapons and 2) on the shared value cards that are not treated as "money" though they have been used to launder drug money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. I believe your stat that 997 weapons were seized.
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 12:23 PM by Fire_Medic_Dave
I don't believe that those 997 weapons were AK-47's and RPG's bought in the United States.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. What weapons were seized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. I don't care if 100% of the guns are coming from the US.
Mexico has failed to do much about the drugs coming north, they expect us to worry about the flow of guns south now that the chickens have come home to roost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. Here is a free clue to the clueless
we are partly responsible, we consume the crap

That's where legalization comes

Oh not only me saying this... by the way

Didn't the SOS say that today? Or the Economists just two weeks ago? That the traffic's going north because WE consume it?

I wish things were black and white but they're not

Need to get that clue stick lengthened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. So you do drugs that explains a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #72
81. They are legal, they were prescribed by the doctor and are prescription
like my diabetes and bp meds...

They are drugs after all

You like to insult people

By the way... nice way to actually discuss policy

Are you this idiotic just tonight or everyday

Perhaps you should go to the Economist Website and google their article on legalization as a serious policy suggestion... something about revising the prohibition that started in 1911...

You do know who or what the economist is, RIGHT?

I doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. Learn to take a joke.
I'm pretty sure Hillary wasn't talking about your diabetes and bp meds. So you aren't consuming the illegal drugs coming from the south and neither am I. So we aren't contributing to the problem.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #85
96. We are as a society, get it now
it is society's problem and we are...

I'm done with you, have a good fucking life and welcome to my ignore list

Those who are too blind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. Ahh the ignore list, that didn't take long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #70
78. Yes, Hillary said that today. She is spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #78
82. Yep she was spot on
and a very bright diplomatic statement to boot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #78
103. Spot the dog?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Last time I checked Clinton is
no longer President, I would feel a lot better if Obama would come out and say it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. She never was as far as I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Doesn't matter unfortuantly neither one
is President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. Maybe Now I Can Have My Own Cluster Bomb
And a side order of Napalm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Those items are covered by the NFA of 1934.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
63. Hopefully Obama will repeal that.
As it clearly violates the second amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #63
73. The Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. Do we have a source for Hillary actually saying it?
i.e. not Andrea Mitchell saying Hillary said it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Maddow said they would air the full interview tomorrow at 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. cool thx.
guess i'll have to turn on my TV set. i try not to do that very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
79. that obama. he's a pretty smart guy. i'm glad he's my president...
booya!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
91. If true, then Obama needs to publicly say so instead of his appointees giving mixed messages.


SoS Clinton says the adminstration will not revive the AWB, but AG Hold said they will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
92. We can only hope. But I wouldn't bet my life on it. Too many mixed messages in
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 09:23 AM by jmg257
this administration, and nothing more definitive from the boss then he wants to renew a permanent AWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
98. Hooray!
One pitfall on the way to 2010 avoided...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
104. which means everyone who was buying them up at inflated prices
look like fools now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #104
108. If the objective was to sell at a profit, yes; if the objective was to own one
without having to worry about future bans, no. I think most recent buyers are in the latter category.

If I didn't already own an AK, I'd definitely pay an extra couple hundred to buy one rather than waiting indefinitely for a lower price. The extra $200 buys the peace of mind of not having to worry about 1990's style trade sanctions and import bans,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
106. So did anyone see it? Was the actual statement consistent?
I wasn't able to watch it cuz the wife wanted to talk about problems at her job. Actually I don't watch a lot of TV anyway. But I'd be very interested to know if Hillary actually stated that the Obama 'administration will not attempt to revive the assault weapons ban.' I admit to being a bit of a gun nut, but more importantly I've got a couple gun owning coworkers who are a bit less, ummm, democrat. I'll love to be able to put this to them tomorrow, if she really did confirm no AWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
109. GOOD. It's about time the "assault weapon" fraud was taken off the table. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
110. That may well be the administrations position.
However, what will the administration do when the Congress presents it wath AWB legislation for the Presidents signature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC