Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay Republicans looking for a new base for party activism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:40 PM
Original message
Gay Republicans looking for a new base for party activism
This is a strange Log Cabin development, covered by the Washington Blade. While we've had a good laughs over the denial of the reality that their party hates them, gay Republicans are trying to regroup to get rid of the, er, logjam that the LCR has found itself in.
The LCR has no paid staff at this time, even as its convention approaches, and a couple of former staff members seem frustrated enough by the missed opportunities to suggest gay conservatives find another home to build a better organization.

Chris Barron, a former Log Cabin political director, said he's involved with activities such as "talking to gay Republicans and kind of getting a sense for what the priorities of gay Republicans are right now."
"A lot of folks who care a lot about the direction that this party is headed in ... are seriously concerned about the lack of a voice for gay Republicans in the party right now," he said.

Jimmy LaSalvia, a former Log Cabin policy director, said he's had discussions with gay Republicans at GOP events and concluded that Log Cabin is "missing a lot of opportunities to provide a voice for gay conservatives."

"We're looking at a political landscape where gay Republicans aren't represented," he said. "Log Cabin's absence has left a void on the political landscape."

Well, after a campaign by John McCain and Sarah Palin in 2008 that was explicitly anti-gay, things can only go up -- if the GOP will even listen to them. RNC chair Michael Steele has been all over the map on the issue. Depending on the day he thinks civil unions are a non-starter or that the whole matter should be left to the states. That's the glimmer of hope these gay Republicans are hanging on to -- that there will be someone willing to give them a seat at the table.
As often as I derided the self-delusional press releases and blog postings that the LCR churned out last year, it's always been tempered by a disappointment that our movement has not been able to achieve good pro-LGBT representation in both parties in order to keep each party on guard and competing for our votes. Democrats take us for granted, and the GOP would rather have us be content as second-class citizens. The LCR really looked like a soiled doormat after this past election cycle. No wonder Barron and LaSalvia want to start fresh.

When asked about the prospect of forming a new gay Republican group, Barron would say only that people should "stay tuned" and "for right now, we are speaking out on issues gay Republicans care about because no one else is."
LaSalvia said he and Barron have made no official decision about starting a new organization, but said they are investigating the feasibility of forming a new group and are "talking with folks who might be interested in something like that."

If they believe they can fix their party and enable "change from within" (something I'm glad no one is holding their breath waiting for), I'm not sure what model will work.
So far, the power establishment in the GOP has decided that they would like to keep squeezing the last bit of use out of its overtly anti-gay posturing to win elections. Until they dump that attitude, gay Republicans will serve as ATMs for candidates who are still willing to be boosters for the homophobic platform of the GOP.

http://www.pamshouseblend.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I simply can't figure out how there can be gay Republicans in the first place.
You'd have to hate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No Shit, It Boggles the Mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I simply can't figure out how there can be gay Republicans in the first place.
it's like turkeys supporting thanksgiving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I've heard it explained as wanting the party to return to its more Libertarian origins.
At it's founding one of the bedrock principles of the gop was getting government out of the lives of private citizens. It's anything but that now, quite the opposite in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Republican gays = Greedy gays.
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 10:31 PM by Lyric
Money calls to money, as Catalyst Theatre's Brecht says.

Edit: Although, not ALL Wealthy gays are Republicans, thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're deluded
Homophobia is the GOP's goose that lays the golden egg, a whole shitload of checks are written to defend the mythical family that they sell to the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would tell them to become Democrats, but our own party has been rather lukewarm on the issue.
So I got nothin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gay Republicans would do far better to look for
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 07:59 PM by rocktivity
a new party, period.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not speaking for them, but

It took many years for the Democratic Party to finally move towards the policies of support we see today, even if the President still speaks about being against gay marriage, he talks about gay issues publicly, mentions gay people in speeches and has not pushed them to the fringes of his policy debate. I'm guessing that the LCR believes that if the same thing can be brought about in the GOP (good luck with that), then the financial principals fall more in line with their own beliefs.

oh, and then there is that self-loathing thing...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. they could put carpet on their backs and be doormats? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. These folks need to grow some self-respect....
and join a party that respects them. About the only place the GOP is willing to meet with them is in airport bathrooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. The are (giggle) "seriously concerned" (yak!)
Oh golly, I almost hurt myself internally on that quote: We are "seriously concerned about the lack of a voice for gay Republicans in the party right now."

:rofl:

Right now? As opposed to what? Yesterday or last week?

:rofl:

A new organization instead of "Log Cabin Republicans"? How about Masochistic Meatheads?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. House Queens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Log Cabin Pukes = Chickens for Col. Sanders
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC