Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pulitzer-winning investigation that dare not be uttered on TV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:41 AM
Original message
The Pulitzer-winning investigation that dare not be uttered on TV
**More accurate information that the masses do not receive through their "teevee news".

Glenn Greenwald
Tuesday April 21, 2009 08:27 EDT


(updated below - Update II)

The New York Times' David Barstow won a richly deserved Pulitzer Prize yesterday for two articles that, despite being featured as major news stories on the front page of The Paper of Record, were completely suppressed by virtually every network and cable news show, which to this day have never informed their viewers about what Bartow uncovered. Here is how the Pulitzer Committee described Barstow's exposés:

Awarded to David Barstow of The New York Times for his tenacious reporting that revealed how some retired generals, working as radio and television analysts, had been co-opted by the Pentagon to make its case for the war in Iraq, and how many of them also had undisclosed ties to companies that benefited from policies they defended.

By whom were these "ties to companies" undisclosed and for whom did these deeply conflicted retired generals pose as "analysts"? ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and Fox -- the very companies that have simply suppressed the story from their viewers. They kept completely silent about Barstow's story even though it sparked Congressional inquiries, vehement objections from the then-leading Democratic presidential candidates, and allegations that the Pentagon program violated legal prohibitions on domestic propaganda programs. The Pentagon's secret collaboration with these "independent analysts" shaped multiple news stories from each of these outlets on a variety of critical topics. Most amazingly, many of them continue to employ as so-called "independent analysts" the very retired generals at the heart of Barstow's story, yet still refuse to inform their viewers about any part of this story.

article in full here: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/21/pulitzer/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick and recommend. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. K + R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mockingbirds. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Double
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Jefferson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You're welcome, infuriating isn't it, the battle to control information,
so damaging for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherDreamWeaver Donating Member (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. recommended, now kicking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. That was a great set of articles - he did the one on McCaffery too, right?
Spectacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm glad you brought that up, this would be valuable for anyone
who hadn't been aware of it and also provides a great cross reference of info...thanks for that!

Monday Dec. 1, 2008 12:26 EST
NBC and McCaffrey's coordinated responses to the NYT story

(updated below - Update II)

Following up on yesterday's post regarding NBC News' suppression of the "military analyst" scandal and its ongoing reliance on the deeply conflicted Barry McCaffrey: I have obtained, from a very trustworthy source, emails sent last week between NBC News executives and McCaffrey (which cc:d Brian Williams), reflecting the extensive collaboration between NBC and McCaffrey to formulate a coordinated response to David Barstow's story. The emails are re-printed here.

in full here: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/01/mccaffrey/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Pentagon Pundit IG report of it's self-investigation
finding itself innocent of anything improper was a final newsdump-- the one they saved for the very, very last minute of the very last Friday BushCo was in office. There was a lot of buildup in the liberal blogoshphere at places like TPM that knew it was due out and watched all that final Friday for it.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/dod_pundit_report_finds_no_wrongdoing.php

It was 80 pages long and had been posted here at the DOD website:

http://www.dodig.osd.mil/Inspections/IE/Reports/ExaminationofAllegationsInvolvingDoDOfficeofPublicAffairsOutreachProgram.pdf

Ah... but no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks for posting that, the report was predictable as well as the
timing of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. . .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC