Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Padilla v. Yoo: cleared to sue a key player in George W. Bush's 'war on terror.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 04:20 PM
Original message
Padilla v. Yoo: cleared to sue a key player in George W. Bush's 'war on terror.'
Padilla v. Yoo
The man once accused of being a 'dirty bomber' is cleared to sue a key player in George W. Bush's 'war on terror.'

Saturday, June 20, 2009

JOHN YOO provided key -- and, we believe, wrong -- legal advice that gave the Bush administration cover for many of its dubious "war on terror" policies. But a judge's decision to allow accused "dirty-bomber" Jose Padilla to proceed with a lawsuit against Mr. Yoo is troubling.

Mr. Padilla, a U.S. citizen, was detained in 2002 after law-enforcement officials suspected him of plotting to detonate a radiological "dirty bomb" in the United States. Mr. Padilla was never tried for this alleged offense; he was instead labeled an enemy combatant and imprisoned in a South Carolina brig without access to counsel or any semblance of due process. Mr. Padilla alleges in his lawsuit that he was subjected to harsh treatment -- from extreme temperatures to sleep and sensory deprivation to solitary confinement -- that violated his constitutional rights and amounted to torture. Mr. Padilla claims that Mr. Yoo should be held personally liable because his legal work on terrorism issues set the foundation for such abuses. Mr. Padilla was ultimately charged and convicted in federal court on terrorism-related charges having nothing to do with the alleged dirty-bomb plot, but not before spending nearly five years in a legal netherworld. Mr. Padilla is seeking $1 in damages -- an amount that his lawyers say proves Mr. Padilla is not in this for the money.

Government officials are usually immune from lawsuits for acts they undertake in their official capacity. Yet Judge Jeffrey S. White of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California declined to dismiss the suit because he concluded that Mr. Padilla "has alleged sufficient facts to satisfy the requirement that Yoo set in motion a series of events that resulted in the deprivation of Padilla's constitutional rights." ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/19/AR2009061903116.html
*
The Poost don't like it. Fuck them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. So will Yoo roll over on Bush to save his own skin?
Edited on Sat Jun-20-09 04:34 PM by lunatica
I suspect he's quite the coward when it's his life that's affected. The reason he's taking a Sabatical from UC Berkeley is because he can't stand being harassed by protesters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Padilla is a US citizen.He has every right to sue Yoo.
He's not doing it for the money and his lawyers aren't either.

I agree - Fuck em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC