Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HHS Rescinds Bush-Era Medicaid Regulations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 08:36 AM
Original message
HHS Rescinds Bush-Era Medicaid Regulations
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000003156522

HHS Rescinds Bush-Era Medicaid Regulations
By Alex Wayne, CQ Staff


The Health and Human Services Department Monday rescinded three controversial Bush administration regulations governing Medicaid and said it would postpone and possibly change or rescind a fourth.

The regulations were among seven that President George W. Bush ’s administration tried to implement in 2007 and 2008 that sent health care providers, state governments and advocates for the poor into a lobbying frenzy. Critics charged that the administration was trying to shift to the states, from the federal government, the burden for about $19.6 billion in Medicaid spending over five years. Medicaid, a health insurance entitlement program for the poor, is a shared federal-state program, and there is constant tension between the two over costs.

The department’s action was not unexpected. Democrats have been particularly critical of the regulations, and introduced several bills in the 110th Congress to stop them. A series of congressional moratoria delayed implementation of most of the regulations until June 30.

One of the regulations the department rescinded would have narrowed Medicaid payments for what are called “case management services” that some states offer to Medicaid clients. Another would have prohibited Medicaid reimbursement for administrative costs incurred by schools, and for transporting Medicaid-eligible children to school. A third would narrow the definition of “outpatient services” under Medicaid — medical treatment performed outside a hospital or clinic. And the regulation that was postponed would limit taxes that some states assess on health providers to help pay the state portion of Medicaid expenses.

That regulation now cannot take effect before June 30, 2010; Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may “give additional consideration to alternative approaches” in the meantime.

Sebelius said she had ordered the three regulations rescinded because they might have harmed Medicaid beneficiaries.

“These regulations, if left in place, would have potentially adverse consequences for Medicaid beneficiaries, some of our nation’s most vulnerable people,” she said in a statement. “By rescinding these rules, we can expect that children will continue receiving services through their schools, beneficiaries will be able to access all available case management resources to help them better manage their health care, and outpatient hospital and clinic services can continue to be covered in the most efficient manner.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. a positive step in the right direction......
now we need medicare for all who wish to join.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R #2 for, taking back GD for GD topics!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No kidding, and with good news, to boot!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hooray for that!
I finally gave up and took a leave of absence. There are still too many threads on a certain subject that doesn't belong in GD, IMHO anyway but at least I don't have to hide 4 out of every 5 threads or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. That was an advantage Bush had
over Ted Bundy. He didn't actually have to kill people by hand, he could do it with a policy change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC