Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidence Emerging Of Cheney-Led Smear Campaign Against Pelosi Over Syria Trip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:52 AM
Original message
Evidence Emerging Of Cheney-Led Smear Campaign Against Pelosi Over Syria Trip
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 08:53 AM by cal04
Before Nancy Pelosi left Israel to travel to Syria earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s spokeswoman Miri Eisin said “Pelosi is conveying that Israel is willing to talk if they (Syria) would openly take steps to stop supporting terrorism.” Pelosi delivered as requested, and this week received a thank you call from Olmert. So why then did the Israeli Prime Minister soon after issue a statement of “clarification” which became the basis for right-wing attacks against Pelosi?

The evidence of White House involvement behind the Israeli Prime Minister’s statement has been growing this past week. Middle East analysts have suggested Bush deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams — a close ally of Dick Cheney — may have been coordinating the attempts to undermine Pelosi’s trip. Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA) said: “‘It’s obvious the White House is desperate to find some phony criticism of the speaker’s trip, even though it was a bipartisan trip,’ said Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA), a Holocaust survivor who is considered the Democrat closest to the pro-Israel lobby. ‘I have nothing but contempt and disdain for the attempt to undermine this trip.’”

Rep. Henry Waxman suggested that the White House’s coordinated attempts to smear Pelosi were part of an effort to undermine her on Iraq:

Waxman said the administration is focused on building a case against the Democrats in preparation for a showdown over the Iraq War funding bill. The more they can paint Democrats as weak and irresponsible, the more likely the Democrats will knuckle under and let the president continue the war unchecked. It’s been known to happen.

So Cheney trashes the reputation of men like Lantos and Waxman (who, by the way, has doggedly pursued waste and mismanagement in Iraq by Halliburton, the company that made Cheney rich), and it’s politics as usual.

(snip)
Last year, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice talked Olmert into a 48-hour cease-fire during the war with Hezbollah to allow humanitarian relief, but within hours Israeli planes were bombing again, to Rice’s surprise and anger. Olmert had received a call, apparently from Cheney’s office, telling him to ignore Rice.



http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/14/evidence-pelosi-white-house/

http://floridajewishnews.com/Opinion/Personal_Views/Rhetorical_Battle_Over_Pelosi_Trip_200704131021/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Dems don't have the balls to not knuckle under in fear of being painted weak on whatever,
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 09:02 AM by indepat
this Republic is history, it's people toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is an equal-opportunity saboteur
The last paragraph reveals the bipartisan nature of his utter depravity. He will sabotage any efforts at peace, anywhere, because he gets his jollies, and his profits, when the bombs are dropping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't that treasonous?
I am sick and tired of Cheney acting like a dictator unto himself. He told Olmert to go against his promise to America? To go against the official position of the US? What gives him the right? He's Vice-President, not President; he should be attending funerals, not setting US foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who the fuck listens to Cheney anymore?
His cred is for shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC