JUST GREAT!!! ANOTHER day of unrec'ing and hiding polanksi threads

[rd_kent]

What a waste of time.

[dipsydoodle]

1. Why not just ignore them

if they annoy you so. :shrug:

[TexasObserver]

2. thanks for sharing

THIS is the thread I've been waiting for.

[MineralMan]

3. Why not just do it? Why bother the rest of us with your

decision? Why post another worthless vanity thread?

[VMI Dem]

4. Don't forget whining incessantly.

[Howardx]

7. +1

[polichick]

5. And posting a new thread about it is NOT a waste of time?? lol

[Subdivisions]

6. I've got like 50 hidden. AFAIAC, he's a perv. Apparently he's never done

it again, as far as we know. The victim has (had) moved on. The state has not. I am all for the rule of law so it makes no difference to me whatsoever that he's prosecuted. If the victim won't testify, they'll have to use his own words against him.

While I acknowledge that child victimization and rape is among the vilest of acts and should be prosecuted, I could care less about the whole matter with Polanski. Fate will deal with him the way it sees fit.

And, now I will add this thread to my iggys.

[951-Riverside]

8. Want a cookie? n/t

[MineralMan]

9. In the meantime, here's a pretty girl:

[rd_kent]

13. Nice!

If all polanski threads had eye candy like that, I wouldnt be so upset! Thanks for that!

[gatorboy]

10. Must be mandatory to start a Polanski thread complaining about Polanski threads today.

[subcomhd]

11. you'll anger the mob. either obsess on Polanski or be a rape apologist

[Ikonoklast]

12. POLANSKI!!!!!!

[rd_kent]

14. Hahaha!!!!

Thats funny! Nice!

[damntexdem]

15. Oh no, another day of unreccing and hiding threads addressing Polanski threads.

Wait: maybe I'll just ignore them. ;-)

[subcomhd]

16. kick

[emilyg]

17. Why not just ignore them?

[SIMPLYB1980]

18. Unrec and hid.