Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jack the Ripper suspect unveiled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:36 AM
Original message
New Jack the Ripper suspect unveiled
New Jack the Ripper suspect unveiled

By Jerome Taylor

Monday, 5 October 2009


Pinning down the identity of Britain’s most notorious serial killer, Jack the Ripper, has occupied the minds of historians and conspiracy theorists alike for decades. Over the years, enthusiasts have pored over the evidence to draw up a list of potential killers that range from the plausible to the preposterous.

A Russian con-artist, a Polish barber, an Irish-American quack and even the eldest son of Edward VII have all been accused of being the man who, for one summer in 1888, brought terror to the heart of London’s East End before disappearing without a trace.

Now, historian Mei Trow claims to have uncovered another potential suspect, one who fits a modern forensic profile of the killer but has, until now, been overlooked by his fellow “Ripperologists”.

Trow believes mortuary attendant Robert Mann, who lived in the area where the killings took place and had a good knowledge of anatomy, would have been regarded as a prime suspect had the modern profiling techniques of today been available to the Metropolitan Police’s baffled officers at the time.

Using a profile of the Ripper drawn up by the FBI in 1988 to mark the centenary of his killings, Trow began looking for a local suspect who hailed from Whitechapel’s lower social classes, was the victim of a broken home, and was someone who had worked as either a butcher, a mortuary worker or a medical examiner’s assistant. He also used modern geographical profiling techniques that can pinpoint where a suspect might live depending on the nature and location of their killings.

It was while trawling through newspaper cuttings of the inquests into the first two Ripper slayings that Trow stumbled across the testimony of Mann, a former workhouse child who by the time of the slayings was in his fifties and working in a mortuary.

When Polly Nichols, the Ripper’s first confirmed kill, was found dead, her body was taken to a nearby mortuary on what was then Eagle Place. Mann opened the mortuary up and, according to the inquest, undressed the body despite being under strict instructions not touch Nichols. The Ripper’s second victim, Annie Chapman, was also taken to Mann’s morgue, which lay within walking distance of all the murders and had taught him how to wield knives in a surgical manner.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/new-jack-the-ripper-suspect-unveiled-1798095.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1.  I can't remember who it was but didn't Patricia Cornwell
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 11:42 AM by saracat
indicate she solved this with DNA from and envelope? And wasn't it a well known writer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am sure there is a lot of DNA in any surviving evidence
There was no such thing as a CSI in the days of the Ripper. Preserving the crime scene was not something they were aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Patricia Cornwell spent lot$ of her own money to place the blame on Walter Sickert
-a well known painter. She even bought some of his paintings and had some torn up as part of her investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Now I remember. He was a painter, not a writer.I read that a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Excellent article by Dean. I remember the story know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Cornwell made a case for Walter Sickert, an artist. IIRC, there were many
who criticized her stringing together the evidence to arrive at Sickert as the suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. She claimed it was the painter Walter Sickert
There's so much flawed methodology in her case that it's kind of a joke among serious Ripperologists.

The site below pretty much blows her argument to pieces.

http://www.casebook.org/dissertations/dst-pamandsickert.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Cornwell's Ripper Book proved she couldn't write non-fiction, either.
Seriously, as a true-crime lover who has read lots of Ripper stuff, Cornwell's book was disjointed and incoherent....a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. The book...
was "Portrait of a Killer". Cornwell believes that American artist Walter Sickert was Jack The Ripper. She lays out a pretty grim and convincing line of evidence. He was a strange child, a violent and domineering man and many of his pictures of women in odd positions seem to have been done from "Life" drawings of the women who were slain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. One thing we do know (apart from it not mattering at all) is....
that you could drain Loch Ness and scour its bottom with an army of investigators, finding no trace whatsoever of a monster, refill the lake, publish the results, and a week later someone would claim to have seen the monster. Millions of people thousands of miles away, would simply refuse to believe that the lake had been drained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We do know that Loch Ness was formed after the last Ice Age
which would exclude Nessie from being a dinosaur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
53. not really
see for example, the celeocanth.

note: i do not believe the loch ness monster exists

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. dude its not a lake, and the monster is real :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. So is Chessie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Cases like Green River and BTK show us that these killers are
rarely some famous person, as so many of the Ripper analyses suggest, and far more likely an ordinary schmoe. I like this theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. One of Obama's ancestors, no doubt. He killed East end prostitutes
to distract several local policemen who would otherwise have been drafted & sent to East Africa (now Kenya) to put down a rebellion in the Obama family village- thereby allowing the Obama family to prosper and produce sons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
16.  This response is nominated for stupidest use of a space on a discussion board.
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 12:03 PM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. *face-bludgeon*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
42. Obama's mother's family had already been here for 200 years when this happened.
Stanley Ann Dunham's ancestors were colonial farmers in Maryland. Adrian Gordy (circa 1650 in Somerset Maryland) is the common ancestor he shares with Jimmy Carter (Lillian Gordy Carter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Unrecc'd for oh so irrelevant....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. History is always relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. ehhh not so much when you are talking about unsolved crimes from 100+ years ago.
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 12:36 PM by ddeclue
If they figure out who did it are they going to dig up his dead body and put it in a jail cell?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Events from 120 years ago tell us about ourselves. Even murders.
If you cannot imagine, at all, what these murders might tell us about the social history of the time, and its relevance to us today, I feel bad for you. Seriously. I used to teach history, and every yer I would get a student that just could not 'get' why learning about things past was important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I love history - this isn't history this is trivia.
:P

Now go dig him up and put him in a jail cell for the rest of his um... death...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. The death of women is trivia? It's funny?
Women who were of the underclass, women who had no political power, no voice? They are trivia?

Ironically, and not in a good way, you highlight the class and gender divisions that Shaw wrote about when he decried the murder of these women, and the bungling of the case by upper-class men, who could not see beyond their own prejudices.

If you love history, then it should have been apparent to you that the search for the Ripper is like all historical questions--you may never find the 'truth' but you will find out truths about the lives of the people who lived then, and about yourself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. This is exactly the problem with society today. Women are considered
"trivia" and so are our interests and concerns. That is why "choice" isn't considered a major issue.That is why the FOCA Bill can't even get out of committtee and the president doesn't make it a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. rec'd for spite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. 2nd that
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. I wish I could unrecc posters. Seriously, who are you to decide if this
is relevant or not to "General Discussion?"

I'm sorry you don't take social history seriously, but those of us who appreciate the context of the Ripper killings, the lives and livelihoods of the people of Whitechapel of the late 19th century, do find it relevant.

You might wish to read Shaw's observations on the Ripper killings for an introduction to the class and social ramifications of these murders--I can't imagine that class warfare is not relevant to a political discussion board, but perhaps you have an answer for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I am ME - welcome to democracy.
this is trivia not history and irrelevant to the current political issues of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. you don't get to decide
and that is fortunate for the rest of us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. I certainly DO get to decide what I want to unrec - get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. of course, but you don't get to decide what is relevant or trivial to DU - get over it
unrec yourself to death for all I care

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I get to decide what I think is relevant or trivial and express that opinion on DU - get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Crime against women is irrelevant to the current issues of the Democratic Party?
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 01:19 PM by msanthrope
Really?

Murdered women are trivia?

As I reflect back on the 15th anniversary of the passage of VAWA, the social historian in me can recognize that we are still battling against the attitudes that hampered the Ripper investigation, namely, the idea that women who are not societally 'pure' are up for grabs. Look at how we fight against crime directed at women, particularly women of the underclass, and you tell me we've advanced to the point where the Ripper investigation can tell us nothing....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. And they say there is no misogyny on DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. No.. Not at all. Dismissing dead women as trivia should not make live women uncomfortable.
No.

Not at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I don't think most people would think of Jack The Ripper as "crimes against women"
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 03:38 PM by imdjh
.... in the sense of a societal crime. Perhaps that's your point, that they ought to, but it would be betrayed by the fact that we're still talking about someone who in the greater scheme of things was not a spectacular killer.

I frankly have never given much thought to the sex or social class of Ripper's victims, which is odd when you consider that the probable reason he's even still in the social consciousness is because of the speculation that he himself was upper class. From a feminist angle, I'd say that the commonality of his victims was that they were prostitutes and that that is not necessarily misogynist when you consider that if he had killed male prostitutes in that time we might not even know that he had existed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. This isn't current and very little relevance to modern crimes against women.
Its only interest is prurient and trivial. It is a distraction from real MODERN DAY issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. Then don't read
You've written X amount of posts posting about posts that waste your time. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sounds plausible to me. Serial killers often take trophies or return to the scene of the crime.
The ability to admire the handiwork after the killing would be particularly appealing to an erotomanic sociopathic killer.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. It was bush
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rings true to me, but I don't know the details. One question: why did he stop? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
50. Wasn't the last one the most gruesome?
I think it was in a room where the Ripper had plenty of time to indulge whatever desires were driving him. Maybe he was done.

And I say that without knowing anything more about Mann's life than the OP article says. I'm looking forward to the TV special
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jack the Ripper: Killer Revealed premieres on Discovery Channel, Sunday 11 October, 9.00pm
We will have to wait and see....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Thanks--DVR'ed it.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. Apparently that showing is on the UK channel
not on US Discovery channel. A show on Ardi is scheduled in my area at that time.

http://www.popfi.com/2009/10/05/jack-the-ripper-revealed/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. Man, people never get tired of this story.
It's amazing how some stuff/events/people imprint themselves so deeply on society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BMD Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
43. Hmm..
Interesting. I was actually reading up on Jack the Ripper a few days ago. Funny how those things happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. I think it was the Polish Barber who had a violent history
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 03:53 PM by mzmolly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
47. Dick Cheney? I know he's old, but wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
48. What an intriguing hypothesis.
The Ripper was killing people, knowing that they would be brought to the mortuary he was working at? I would like to look at the evidence, but it's a fascinating idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. I wonder if they found any of Mann's correspondence;
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 04:55 PM by Uncle Joe
which may shed clues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC