Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama, Congress Prepare to Thwart ACLU Suit Over Abuse Photos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 07:55 PM
Original message
Obama, Congress Prepare to Thwart ACLU Suit Over Abuse Photos
Obama, Congress prepare to thwart ACLU suit over abuse photos

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, October 10th, 2009 -- 10:24 am

In the continuing legal battle over 21 photographs showing terror war prisoner abuse, the U.S. government has not seen much success arguing for nondisclosure in federal court. So, the Obama administration -- which once promised to make public this shameful chapter of the Bush administration -- has hatched a new strategy to keep the scenes of torture from being released.

"The Obama administration believes giving the imminent grant of authority over the release of such pictures to the defense secretary would short-circuit a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union under the Freedom of Information Act," reported the Associated Press on Saturday.

It was with this new strategy in mind that the administration asked Supreme Court justices to stay their decision on the photos' release, allowing Congress time to vote on dictating the authority solely to the secretary of defense. The photos relate to abuse alleged to have taken place between 2001 and 2005 in Abu Ghraib and six other prisons. Some of the photos were said to depict rape and sexual abuse, though the Pentagon has denied this.

The measure is part of a Homeland Security appropriations bill that may be voted on in the coming week. The Supreme Court could rule on the photos as early as Tuesday, AP added.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is so wrong
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. cover up. fucking cover up.
the more things change, etc.
knr
oh and he can take his nobel prize back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Congress likes to change the rules in a middle of a lawsuit...
Edited on Sat Oct-10-09 08:01 PM by Eric J in MN
...when doing so will help a right-wing agenda (retroactive-immunity for phone companies, concealing abuse of prisoners.)

In the Lilly Ledbetter sex-discimination case though, Congress waited until after the Supreme Court ruled, and then passed legislation which will NOT give her another chance in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good less snuff for you to plaster.
But I bet one day we will get to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Accessory To A Crime"
and that's not a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and nobody's laughing...
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Indeed...
no joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Norwegian Nobel Committee called. They want their prize back.
Just kidding, but seriously, I wonder if this would have affected their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They should. But then they should never have given it to him in the first place, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. WHERE is somebody with a conscience in those offices who will leak those photos--we have a right to
know what has been (is still being???) done in our names, and with our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. What good will releasing the photos do if no one gets prosecuted?
Edited on Sat Oct-10-09 11:09 PM by Sultana
Way too many PUMAs in this thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC