Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boulder's Naked Halloween Streak May Be Coming to an End

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:56 AM
Original message
Boulder's Naked Halloween Streak May Be Coming to an End
OCTOBER 31, 2009

Boulder's Naked Halloween Streak May Be Coming to an End
Runners Are Out of Their Gourds, Wearing Just a Pumpkin; Police Chief Calls It a Crime

By STEPHANIE SIMON

BOULDER, Colo. -- This city has always taken pride in its liberal-to-the-point-of-loony reputation. But this Halloween, one of its wackiest traditions is under siege: the Naked Pumpkin Run. The event is exactly what its name implies. Scores of men and women pour into downtown streets for a late-night jog, wearing not a stitch between the jack-o'-lanterns on their heads and the sneakers on their feet. For nearly a decade, naked pumpkin runners did their thing unmolested, stampeding through the frigid dark past crowds of admirers who hooted, hollered and tossed candy. But last year the run attracted more than 150 participants, and Police Chief Mark Beckner fears things are getting out of hand. "It's a free-for-all," he says. So he intends to stop it. He will station more than 40 officers on the traditional four-block route tonight, with two SWAT teams patrolling nearby. All have orders to arrest gourd-topped streakers as sex offenders.

Runners and their fans are outraged. This is not the free-spirited Boulder they know and love. "It kind of reminds me of what's happening in Tehran," says Andy Schmidt, a lawyer. "They're pre-emptively outlawing a gathering." The American Civil Liberties Union has fired off a letter accusing the police of violating citizens' constitutional rights to express whatever it is they're expressing when they slip hollowed-out pumpkins over their heads and race buck naked down the Pearl Street pedestrian mall. The annual rite "seems somewhat quixotic," concedes Judd Golden, chairman of the ACLU's Boulder County chapter, "but our Bill of Rights does not judge the content of free expression." At a recent forum for city council candidates, all 10 participants said they disapproved of the threatened crackdown. Even Mayor Matt Appelbaum, who supports the police, admits to a tinge of worry that arresting Halloween streakers will tarnish Boulder's reputation as, well, Boulder.

(snip)

Last year, in a first tentative move against the pumpkin runners, police ticketed a dozen participants, including Mr. Abramov. The Pumpkin 12, as they became known, all had the charges against them dropped or reduced to disorderly conduct in exchange for a few hours' community service. This year, police plan to make a stronger statement. They are on edge not just about the pumpkin run but also about an outdoor costume party that could draw thousands of rowdy revelers to the pedestrian mall. So this time, officers won't mess around with handing out tickets; they expect to make arrests.. It's not illegal to be naked in downtown Boulder. In fact, the city has had a long, proud history of nudity. Hundreds of University of Colorado students dashed across campus in the buff in 1974, in a vain attempt to set a Guinness World Record. More recently, Boulder has played host to an annual Naked Bike Ride to protest dependence on fossil fuels. And the Boulder Daily Camera, the local newspaper, serves up a steady stream of stories about clothes-free joggers and nudist gardeners.

Casting about for a law to apply, since nudity per se is not illegal, police hit upon the state's indecent exposure statute, which makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for anyone to knowingly expose his or her genitals in circumstances "likely to cause affront or alarm." Given that the Naked Pumpkin Run starts at 11 p.m., long after young trick-or-treaters have retired, and given that the route is packed with fans who come out specifically to see the event, runners argue that it's absurd to think their prank is causing either affront or alarm. Even if the run does catch a few people by surprise, "the joy it brings overall far outweighs the one or two people who could be offended," says Callie Webster, who is 22 and a veteran pumpkinhead. Police acknowledge they have not been flooded with pumpkin-run-related complaints, but say that's beside the point. A throng of naked people with jack-o-lanterns on their heads is, by definition, an alarming sight, Chief Beckner says. Therefore, it's illegal.

(snip)

The looming threat has scrambled planning for the pumpkin run, which is loosely organized even in the best of years. (This being Boulder, the only hard-and-fast rule is that participants must put their pumpkins into a compost heap after the run.).. With so many runners spooked, some organizers are quietly planning to outflank the police by taking their pumpkins elsewhere. Come nightfall, they intend to doff their clothes and don their gourds in a nearby, unnamed but presumably less prudish city. A restaurant called Hapa Sushi offers an alternative for those who remain loyal to Boulder: It's handing out free orange undies, including barely-there thongs, imprinted with the slogan "Run Responsibly." The Naked Pumpkin Run is not for everyone. It's hot and smelly and goopy inside the jack-o'-lanterns. Even hollowed out, the pumpkins can weigh 25 to 30 pounds, so they are heavy and tough to balance; veteran runners learn to carve big ears that can double as handles.

(snip)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125693458626119361.html (subscription)

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. How cold is it in Boulder at 11pm on October 31st?
Accuweather says it will be 37 degrees.

Not yet freezing, but cold enough, lol. Why would genitals with goosebumps cause affront or alarm to those who show up to see them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. What else might they do?
Someone mad enough to go out naked when the temperature is 5 degrees above freezing might do *anything*. After that, the running-around-in-public-with-a-pumpkin-on-your-head bit is just icing on the cake...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. What DID they do last night?
Did they run? Did the SWAT teams move in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. No idea.
If it were me, I wouldn't bother with SWAT teams, I'd just go round the hospitals the next day rounding up anyone with... intimate... cases of hypothermia (assuming of course that I regarded running around naked with a pumkin on yuor head as cause for arrest, which I don't - extreme mockery, yes, but not arrest).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes.
:rofl:

I don't think I'd stay up that far past my bedtime for a chance to mock them, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. more than 40 officers on the traditional four-block route tonight, with two SWAT teams patrolling
All have orders to arrest gourd-topped streakers as sex offenders.


SWAT TEAMS?
SWAT TEAMS?

Jesus effing' Christ - can't we just have FUN and be silly every once in awhile in this fucking country anymore?

Arrest them as sex offenders.
Nice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That is really amazing to me..
i can see a bullshit arrest for a misdemeanor but charging a person with a sex crime is abusive. SWAT has no business being involved in an activity like that. I live near Chapel Hill and there is a long tradition of stupid drunken behavior and the police are pretty reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. BOOO!!
Sounds like a blast. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Boulder police are doing what is known as 'cherry picking'. Picking the low hanging fruit
as it were.

If the Boulder police can't find something more useful to do with their time and arms, the citizenry should really consider new leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Let's hope that the DA and/or the judge will throw out any charges
and make sure that the words "sex offender" are never to be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Lol at the use of the phrase "low hanging fruit".
I have a dirty mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I chose my phrases with great care.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-31-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sure you did.
Wonder how it ended.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Looks like the run did not happen,,
Edited on Sun Nov-01-09 09:59 AM by geckosfeet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thanks. I hope that the citizens of Boulder and City Council
will take a stand next year. The point is: who determines what is lawful, or unlawful? Aren't the tax payers of Boulder paying these police officers' salaries?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. why do cops think they are the moral authority for citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SallyMander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. No sports bra, ouch!

:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. I know my middle granddaughter isn't
a pumpkin runner. She attends college in Boulder, but she's a proper young lady and would never participate in such hooliganish goings on.

I'm sure of it.

OK, pretty sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. How did this story end up in the Wall Street Journal?
Oh yeah, that's right...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC