|
Edited on Sat Oct-31-09 06:58 PM by Ironman3476
I was reading in another forum and came across the term "Bush recession" and got to wondering, why don't all progressives refer to it that way?
The right has, for some time now, held an advantage over us in how they frame things, hang labels on ideas and people they disagree with, and make them stick, regardless of how untrue or absurd.
Already, for months now I have been hearing reporters and commentators posing the question: How long before this becomes Obama's economy?" This infuriates me, because no matter how long it takes, Obama is dealing with BUSH'S recession.
If the economy were a jetliner, Obama took over the controls with the thing in a nose dive, and three engines ON FIRE! This recession should be hanging around W's neck forever.
Whenever a Dem is interviewed about the economy, every reference to it should be termed "Bushes recession". Especially on MSNBC, hang it on Bush, make HIM wear it.
I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but framing, and labels DO make a difference, not so much to the readers here, but to the little informed masses who vote based upon ten second sound bites, name recognition, and "I like the way he/she looks". It just seems to me that truth ought to be involved somehow.
|