Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An exceptional local Alaskan perspective on the Palin phenomenon from the Anchorage Daily News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 04:41 PM
Original message
An exceptional local Alaskan perspective on the Palin phenomenon from the Anchorage Daily News
This is one of the finest dissections of the Palin phenomenon that I've read, amazing insight from such a young person. Julia O'Malley has been writing for the Anchorage Daily News since she was in high school. This is well worth reading the whole thing and the comments.

http://community.adn.com/adn/node/145684?pageNum=1&&&&&&&&&&&mi_pluck_action=page_nav#Comments_Container



She's everywhere, but don't ask where Palin is coming from
Posted by adn_jomalley

Posted: November 28, 2009 - 12:58 am

Comments (105) | Recommend (42)

I can't escape her. No one can. She's everywhere. At the gym, talking on five televisions. At the doctor, on the first magazine in the waiting-room pile, "We read 'Going Rogue' so you don't have to!" I thought I should at least try to follow all the excitement, so I DVR'd her on Oprah last week. But when I watched it, a strange drowsiness took hold, and the information wouldn't soak in. I was saturated.

Remember when guv love was everywhere? Approval ratings were stratospheric. But at Costco this week, where shoppers rolled obliviously past a huge pile of "Going Rogues," it seemed fervor had subsided. Book sales at local Borders and Barnes & Noble were strong, managers said, but it was no Harry Potter situation. Were we saturated? Maybe not. But I wondered why we weren't a stop on the book tour.

I'm no hater. In fact, I might even have voted for her. But that was eons ago, before she became somebody else.

The last time I interviewed her, it was just after she announced she was pregnant with Trig. She had this warm, relaxed, familiar quality. I already thought she was savvy. She had never been extra sophisticated when it came to talking about policy, but in Alaska we never expect that of our politicians. She understood her audience. She got our populism, our libertarian streak. What I liked best: you could never be sure what she was going to do.

She wasn't tight with the Republicans, but she wasn't in line with Democrats, either. Mostly she seemed motivated by common sense. She did her thing with oil taxes and the gas line and ethics legislation. She didn't talk about abortion and the Bible too much. And, she was cool with redistributing wealth. I'm still telling people the story of the Hmong family of 10 in Mountain View who made the down payment on a four-plex thanks to the $1,200 "energy bonus" they each got from the state, on top of their usual PFD.

<snip>

Last week I was asked to talk about "Going Rogue" on television, so I slogged through it. In all 403 pages of heartwarming family moments, Bible-quoting, abortion talk, Reagan-references and bitterly-recalled political scenes, I kept looking for that woman I remembered, the breezy neighbor. But she wasn't there.

Instead, there was a character I didn't recognize, busy settling the score for innumerable slights, setting up political straw men and knocking them down. Her every memory was calibrated to echo a talk-radio talking point. She was too perfect, rarely reflecting on her own mistakes, mostly unchanged by her life's remarkable turn. And she lived in world that seemed like a Northern Exposure version of where I'm from, like small town anywhere with lots of scenery shots and the occasional bowl of moose chili.

There she was at the Country Kitchen, having breakfast with the waitresses named Ruby and Flo, the plumbing store owner and the construction worker. It was a diner scene that could have happened any place, but in the book it was emblematic of "the real America," where patriotism blooms and "kitchen table wisdom" is dispensed. It felt manufactured.

But then she knows her audience now, and they aren't from here. They are from diner towns on rural highways, from Fayetteville, Ark. and Springfield, Mo., and Sioux City, Iowa. Her audience is in agriculture and manufacturing. They are rural or suburban, usually white, heavily evangelical.

<snip>

I'm headed Outside for the holidays and I'm already preparing for a whole new onslaught of questions from strangers. "You're from Alaska?" they'll ask. And then they'll want to know what I think about her.

But what they don't know is I'm a tired observer just like everyone else. I can't explain the phenomenon she's become because she doesn't resemble the politician I knew, and her Alaska isn't mine. So when they ask, I'll probably just shrug and tell the truth, "I have no idea where she's coming from."



I like this comment:


The person Sarah Palin was able to convince Alaskans she was when she was elected Alaska's Governor, is the exact same person Alaska wanted and needed. But in reality, Sarah Palin was NEVER that person she represented herself to be. So, yes she has changed, but the new Sarah isn't any more or less real than the old Sarah. Sarah peddles her image to the public to benefit Sarah. Sarah is a fake. Then and now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is she still popular in Alaska?
No one in the media seems to care to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, she is not.
Not at all. Even before she was picked for VP, she had alienated much of the Republican establishment here. Then during the campaign she threw all her Democratic and Independent allies under the bus. She managed to put off just about everybody. People just roll their eyes now when her name is mentioned.

I'm sure she still has some die-hard followers here just like she does everywhere, but almost everyone has wised up to her game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh the irony...
even the author of this doesn't see it...

"She got our populism, our libertarian streak...

And, she was cool with redistributing wealth. I'm still telling people the story of the Hmong family of 10 in Mountain View who made the down payment on a four-plex thanks to the $1,200 "energy bonus" they each got from the state, on top of their usual PFD."

Out and out socialism (actually, almost communism) in a state with oil money... but they are all "libertarians".

I wonder what would happen if the state ended their oil payments AND the federal government ended it's subsidy of Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, it's a funny thing about Alaskans,
We have, let's say, a "complicated" relationship with both the federal govenrment AND the oil companies. But the bottom line is that it's written into our constitution that the "people" of the state own the resources, which is the principle that the Alaska Permanent Fund was founded on. It seems that we are getting free money from the state, but it's really ours.

And federal money comes here because 65% of the state is owned by the federal government. It belongs to you down there as much as it does to us. Here's an interesting chart showing how Alaska's land is allocated.

http://nrm.salrm.uaf.edu/~stodd/AlaskaPlanningDirectory/landOwnership.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Where's my oil revenue check?
If we "down there" own 65% of the state of Alaska and "the people" that own the state own the resources, where is MY check?

You all seem to want it both ways... When it comes to oil revenue "the people of Alaska own the resources" but when it comes to paying for services... why, the federal government owns 65% of the land so they should pay for the services.

Put that with a "faux Libertarian" self image of rugged individualists, living off the land and so on, and perhaps you can see the irony here.

I know, not everyone in Alaska is a Libertarian... but the ones that think that they are completely self sufficient should take a good look at themselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm not going to argue with you.
As I said, our relationship is complicated. Another way of looking at it is Alaskans are being paid off by the federal government for giving up development rights on such a huge percentage of the state. That's not necessarily the way I look at it, because I'm not pro-development, ut a lot of old-time Alaskans think we gave up too much in the ANCSA and ANILCA legislations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. what do you mean both ways? You own half the state and we own
Edited on Sat Nov-28-09 11:43 PM by roguevalley
the rest. if your state doesn't want to share the wealth of your land which you own, why blow hard at us when we did it?

You need to watch the National Geographic Channel Alaska State Troopers series and maybe you would get a look at the dichotomy of what life is up here. Rugged individualist is a full time job for a lot of people and they do it in the most extreme conditions in the country and perhaps in only a few other arctic places in the world. People up here are oddly independent and they like the expansiveness of the place. Texas is big and has a big attitude to their thinking but they don't have so many ways to die just by taking the wrong fork in the road and ending up stranded in the snow.

There are plenty of people completely self-sufficient. I know many. They also LIVE here. Come on up and LIVE here and you can have a check too after a year. Its not hard. And if you live far enough off the main road system you can pay $10/gal gas, 13$/gal milk and 2400$ a MONTH heating bills. Anyone is welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Lapfog, to follow up on what RogueValley says
you should peruse this blog http://www.anonymousbloggers.com/ for a bit and then talk about how people in Alaska aren't self-sufficient.

I'll grant you, our cities and towns on the road system aren't much different than yours, but life in rural Alaska is unlike anything you've ever experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The point is, you all live in possibly the most socialist state in
the union.

And many Alaskans (like Sarah Palin, who hardly lives in the outback) maintain this "Libertarian/individualist" phony claptrap.

I've grew up in places not all that different, snowed in for weeks with no services and no way out except by snowshoe. And I've been to Alaska. Beautiful place. Almost took a high paying job in Fairbanks. Sort of like taking a high paying job in San Francisco... it HAS to be high paying because the cost to live there is so high.

But it's not the state or the people, it's the failure to recognize your own system of chosen governance. If you all came out and SAID "It's sure nice that we set up this socialist vision of equally sharing the revenue from our natural energy resources." I'd have no problem. Not even when the next sentence is "Come on up here and try to survive here".

But the author of the Palin article, not to mention the queen bee of hypocrisy herself, talks about Libertarianism and almost in the next sentence talks about how great it is that a family of 10 can pool their state revenue sharing check and buy a 4-plex... well, it's a bit breathtaking.

I don't like hypocrisy. Says so in my sig. Had that sig since joining DU these many years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Knowing what I know about Julia O'Malley
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 02:45 PM by Blue_In_AK
and her family, I imagine that she was saying "libertarian" with her tongue firmly planted in her cheek. Her grandmother and her mother have both been very active in Anchorage municipal politics for decades as outspoken progressives, so I'm sure she realizes the dichotomy. Sarah, on the other hand, doesn't get it.

I've been amused that the Republicans in Alaska were all in a dither last year when Mark Begich was elected because they were SURE he wouldn't be able to bring home the bacon like Ted Stevens did all those years. Don Young holds an annual fundraiser up here which he unabashedly calls a "pig roast" because he's known as the king of pork.

I honestly don't know how these people can hold the two concepts - libertarianism and pork-barrel Republicanism - in their heads at the same time without them exploding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. I've never objected to those arrangements
--just wondered why the rest of us can't have them. There are resources other than oil, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. KnR. Thanks for the news. >shakes head<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. thanks for the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. We Should Convince Her To Run As An Independent
See how many votes she could pick up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It wouldn't surprise me either.
She has no loyalty to either party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. When we were there last year
we took the Juneau trip... and the guide was all chirpy telling us about the Governor and how she was going to end up as VEEP. And chirpy bubbly girl was oh so excited... this was before the elections... she told us how much good she did. Of course she was telling this to a bunch of tourists on the way to a boat to meet whales hardly what you'd think appropriate on a tour buss. But this girl spoke of a women that though republican seemed like a descent politico.

This perspective makes me almost want to go to borders to get Going Rogue... together with a copy of the Diagnostic Manual... and HOW to create fictional characters. Something tells me the character in Going Rogue is truly fictional like everything else...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Truly fictional.
Edited on Sat Nov-28-09 09:16 PM by Blue_In_AK
You are so right. I haven't talked to one Alaskan who wasn't completely shocked by Sarah Palin's RNC speech. I sat down to watch it, hoping that she would do us proud, but the words coming out of her mouth were so incendiary and so unlike anything we had ever heard from her, it took my breath away. I couldn't watch more than 10 minutes. She is unrecognizable now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Why I believed that Rogue is a work of fiction
I just wonder how one dimensional...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. agreed. No one talks about her in my neck of the woods, southcentral.
I haven't heard her name in a way long time. People are just sick of her and her crazy. She is embarrassing to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. How do they reconcile their supposed "libertarian streak" with their
delight in redistributing wealth? I am always amazed that so many people claim to believe certain ideologies without having a clue about what those ideologies embody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. That is a very good read.
thank you for posting the link

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. thanks for sharing, first SP article I read through to the end, since the election
she reminds me of a lot of politicians, cept she's still new to the scam, and it shows... give her a few more years, she'll be able to shoot the breeze as well as the big D.C. moose, in no time ;>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC