Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democracy Now--Eliot Spitzer: Geithner, Bernanke “Complicit” in Financial Crisis and Should Go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:03 PM
Original message
Democracy Now--Eliot Spitzer: Geithner, Bernanke “Complicit” in Financial Crisis and Should Go
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 10:03 PM by kpete
Democracy Now--Eliot Spitzer: Geithner, Bernanke “Complicit” in Financial Crisis and Should Go

..............

AMY GOODMAN: Well, why don’t you start off by talking about how you think President Obama has handled the economy, the bailout? And you can’t speak in sound bites.

ELIOT SPITZER: Alright, no sound bites on this show, which is good news. And thank you for inviting me.

Let me begin by saying that I think Senator Sanders was wrong in only one respect: it wasn’t that the Fed was asleep at the switch; they were actually complicit. And by that, what I mean is that the Chairman, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner, when he was the president of the New York Fed, actually built and participated in creating the structure that now has collapsed. And that, I think, is what is so problematic to so many of us. They are now claiming credit for having taken trillions of our tax dollars and given those dollars back to the banks to return them to solvency, when the initial bankruptcy and the initial illiquidity and the initial crisis was very much a consequence of the very policies they put in place.

Stepping back for a moment, we have a major crisis in this nation, and that crisis is jobs. That crisis is that we are seeing the elimination of the middle-class job foundation that permits most Americans to do better year after year after year. The reality is median family income has been stagnant for forty years, and the policies of what I call financialization, which is major banks trading assets back and forth, the Wall Street banks, such as Goldman, which is rightly a lightning rod right now for much of what’s going on, buying and selling, playing with tax dollars in proprietary trading—they make huge money, nothing is added to the economy, jobs are sent overseas. All of this going on simultaneously. That is what our economy has become.

And Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner were the architects of this. And now they are saying, “Didn’t we do a good job six months ago giving money to the banks?” No. Go back two, three, five years. Where were they? Tim Geithner, over and over, bailed out the banks. He was, as president of the New York Fed, the overseer of the institution that collapsed. And so, it’s akin to going to a doctor who has said, “I have a great technique for you: I’m going to bleed you,” and he bleeds you, and he gets you more and more sick and sick and sick. Then when you’re about to die, he puts a tourniquet on you and says, “Gee, I’m good.” No, your prescriptions have been wrong since the beginning.

VIDEO & TRANSCRIPT:
more:
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/12/4/eliot_spitzer_geithner_bernanke_complicit_in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no doubt in my mind that Spitzer was set up with that prostitution thing
Not saying he didn't do anything. Just saying that people in high places wanted him gone.

I want him back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's always how it goes
You're not allowed into that party without them having blackmail on you...or as you say, embarrassing situations can always be arranged or even fabricated if necessary.

IMO, so he had a call girl. Big whoop. I'd rather see the real players brought to task instead of always getting the sideshow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Is there any legal reason why he wouldn't be allowed back in politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Joe Bruno was recently found guilty and may have to go to jail
Spitzer avoided jail but lost his elected position..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Why does Vitter get to stay?
And Ensign... et al

Yet Spitzer had to resign?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I thought so too
They probably realized that he had a good shot at becoming Attorney General, and they couldn't have that. I've thought similar things about John Edwards for the same reason. Either of them probably would have been a more effective AG than Eric Holder when it came to corporatist criminals.

Not that I'm excusing either of their stupid actions of course, just like I didn't excuse Bill Clinton's. (Yeah, I believe Monica was a setup too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hear! Hear!
Geithner and Bernanke never should have been
appointed in the first place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't care if he's an arrogant asshole and wore black socks...
to bang a hooker...I want Spitzer back. This whole thing was orchestrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I want him back, too. And I want Geitner, Summers, Bernanke, and
Rahm to have more time with their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. "the money, put in perspective —Arne Duncan, our Secretary of Education ,
has $4 billion to redo all of K-through-12, and everybody’s saying, “Isn’t this great? Four billion dollars.” Goldman Sachs got $12.9 .

Eight billion dollars for high-speed rail. Entire high-speed rail stimulus effort, $8 billion. Goldman Sachs got $12.9 .

So what are the priorities, in terms of infrastructure investment, job creation, building the foundation of an economy that will permit us to be competitive so that real Americans can get jobs, not just investment bankers and lawyers?"







:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Look how much for the military...
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 01:04 PM by maryf


its all the pink...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Spitzer is Nightmare on Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. You have the Spitzer is a nightmare correct....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Love Democracy Now!! Great post, kpete. Too late to rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twitomy Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. I like Spitzer..
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 06:44 AM by twitomy
Too bad he couldnt keep it in his pants...He might have been Prez material..but then again he would probably sell out like the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The hooker affair was the last in a string of really stupid moves....
even without the hooker affair he was not presidential material!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. When you weigh killing thousands of civilians and enriching WS v. adultery and prostitution
it must feel satisfying to know that America agrees with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. unrec for any thread quoting Spitzer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Cheers for ad hominem attacks, they are all the rage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selena Harris Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
20. None dare call it "conspiracy".....
it's "complicity"!

Incidentally AND coincidentally, look at the last six letters in conspiracy-it spells "piracy."

(Neo) CON'S PIRACY-------how's THAT for synchronicity,Mr. Jung?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC