Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is a Celebrity President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:20 AM
Original message
Obama is a Celebrity President
This is why there is so much fawning over what he and Michelle wear to the balls, what he looks like with his shirt off, etc. This is why there is so much new support for the "war" in Afghanistan here at DU: if Obama does it, I support it without question, etc, etc. It's pathetic: I don't like hero worship, even when it is of a politician I voted for.

We cannot stop corporatism and militarization from killing the heart of our social fabric if we do not engage our politicians with a spirit of honest critique. I'm glad he won; it was one of the most important elections in this nation's history: if we want real change, however, we cannot put this man on a pedestal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps we just live in a celebrity culture. Obama never asked to be that type of President.
The media fawns over all kinds of nonsensical fluffy stuff these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Crips , yes we live in a celebrity culture. That's the problem.
But make no mistake , Obama ran on that platform and his entire campaign promoted this to the point of insanity, it was embraced. Star power to the max.

There has never been a time this was not the case since JFK. It has never helped and it is a prime example of how dumbed down this country has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Obama never ran on that kind of "platform".
He never said, "elect me, I'm a star". Sarah Palin is cornering that market.
He had actual ideas. On his website. That many people never really looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Obama did not have to say it.
When I asked Obama supporters during the campaign what Obama stood for I was always refered to his two books and no were on the internet was much info on Obama just his limited experience and a brief life story.

Yet during his entire campaign many of his supporters on this site wrote in stories of their experience the rallies and how they broke into tears over a few lame songs ad how they cried after voting out of happiness. Some fainted . Many up until this day post photo's and ramble on how great the Obamas look.

What do you define this behavour as?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Some people fawn over Sarah Palin too. But Obama never caused that.
It was a reaction to the Obamas, not something they did. I grew up in the 80's and remember hearing constantly about Nancy Reagan's fashion too. Perhaps the Bushes were just dull?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. All I'm saying is Obama did run a campaign based on
Youth and energy and the people who bought this were the ones who ramped it all up but the Obamas went along with it and played on it. They used it as a tool. The campaign set the stage on this idol figure and making history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your concern is duly noted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:49 AM
Original message
I know what that means! lol!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Please, not that phrase again.

Please, please, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hero worshipers are unrec your message. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. People who don't like strawman arguments might unrec it too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why is this in your opinion a strawman argument? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because it creates a strawman (Celebrity Obsessed DU'er) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Forgeting the tabloid-like title and the first paragraph
You don't think there is a valid points in his statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. None.
ce⋅leb⋅ri⋅ty  /səˈlɛbrɪti/ Pronunciation –noun, plural -ties for 1.
1. a famous or well-known person.
2. fame; renown.

Origin:
1350–1400; ME < L celebritās multitude, fame, festal celebration, equiv. to celebr- (s. of celeber) often repeated, famous + -itās -ity

Synonyms:
2. distinction, note, eminence, stardom.

>all people in the public eye are celebrities<

it is a strawman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. yes, there's some hero worship of Obama here. There's also hero worship
of Hugo Chavez- though I've never seen a post about what he looks like with his shirt off. Your claim that there's "so much new support" for the war in Afghanistan is unsubstantiated. There's always been a degree of support for Afghanistan here.

But by and large there's far more criticism of Obama here at DU than praise. I have no problem with that. I have a problem with people claiming that the opposite it true. It isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. yup, I will take that too
there is indeed worship of Chavez here as well. That's actually my point: this type of nonsense is common on both sides of the political aisle. It doesn't seem to matter if it is Palin, Obama or Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. well, most Chavistas like him for his politics, not because he grins or hugs children or draws big
rallies

they know what the policies are, and why they're good ones

with the obtuse Dem boosterists, whenever someone complains about the Afghan escalation (which'll kill thousands), they just repeat how it's irrational to demand that Obama balance the budget and "clean up" Bush's mess in only N months

or just import a big picture of him hugging a child and yell "I believe in Him!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. I remember the McCain campaign trying to get some mileage out of the "Celebrity" meme
Obama never asked to be a "celebrity"

A miniscule % of Du'ers "fawn" over him. If any.

I think you are pretty much making a strawman argument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. (((((shhhh))))
Obama bashing is all the rage ya know

you will be properly flamed for your insolence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Too much herb??
Chronic???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. yes, you could use a bit more!
There's a reason it has been used by visionaries and mystics for centuries. Nice try at an ad hominem, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Just riffin' on that rad username and icon you use, sparky.
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 11:51 AM by cliffordu
Sorry about harshing your mellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hope our next president is an 90 year-old ascetic who lives in a cave...
...and whispers his judgment to the outside world through a crack in the ceiling.

Sheesh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Sheesh from here too nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think we've had celebrity presidents for a long time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Yes, we have. This is not new. I'll trace it back to the Roosevelts.
It really got going as national media expanded.

We usually vote for the taller, prettier and more charming. It's been going on a long time.

The worship of JFK here, by some, borders on creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. You have to be a celebrity to get elected
Who else can get millions of people to vote for them?
The corporate media hides anything with content and fawn over him for the Almighty dollar. Where has there ever been honest critique? The majority of people I have met would neither understand it or want to even try.
Why do you think we haven't seen "real change"? He didn't even campaign to change much of anything. Why do you think he needed all those change signs? No one running on a platform of real change and strong reform needs to be surrounded by giant change signs constantly. It is only to sub-consciously make people think that he supported some vague and essentially meaningless concept of change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, I really like FDR, but I'll fry him for several things he did. I don't worship him or any pol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Don't try to blow off people's opinions.
Yoru claim that people here support the escalation because Obama is a celebrity president isn't much more than ad hominem attack. We need to be more respectful of people's thoughts than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. i've not seen much 'fawning' over President Obama by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. Another post like this
was badly needed.

Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thank you for your "concern". He is hardly on a pedestel. He is being
critiqued half to death, in case you hadn't noticed, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Please don't revive the "concern" line again.

Please, please, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Kindly STFU and don't presume to tell me or anyone else here what to
Edited on Mon Dec-07-09 01:18 PM by kestrel91316
say or think.

You'll be much happier over at FR. They don't let anybody say anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. LOL!

Good one! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. All presidents are celebrities
To ignore the personal magnetism of chosen leaders is to ignore the dynamics of the situation. Jimmy Carter won because the country needed a president who was the antithesis symbolization of Nixon's snaky cynicism. Reagan won because he appeared more resolute than Carter. Bush senior won because he represented a continuation of Reagan and was painted as more manly than Dukakis. Clinton won because he was a fresh alternative to a tired old man. Bush Jr. won because, well, he won because he stole both elections and Americans weren't ready to see themselves as complicit in corruption. Obama won because we finally looked at ourselves and realized it was time to change.

I stated during the primaries that if I were to vote along the lines of my dreams and wishes that I would have voted Kucinich. I also stated that I wanted to win and that is why I supported Barack Obama. As well, I said that all politicians make grand promises during a campaign and that if Mr. Obama fulfilled 1/3 of what he promised, that would be 1/3 more fulfillment than any other president I've ever known.

AFAIK, he's producing at at least (if not more than) one third fulfillment. I am satisfied. I knew what I was getting by voting for him and in many ways, he has surpassed my expectations.

Throw terms like "celebrity" around all you want. Invectives are meaningless and solve nothing. As someone else here said, too many of us have become accustomed to leaders who do our thinking and acting for us. Barack Obama expects us to work for what we want instead of demanding he shoulder all. I am quite delighted to finally have a president who leads by getting out of the people's way.

You want change? Make it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. Thanks for the lecture. Enjoy your weed, oh wise one nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nice.
- Right-wing talking points (McCain used the "celebrity" crap)
-A strawman (claiming people who support Obama's exit plan for Afghanistan are saying "if Obama does it, I support it without question, etc, etc.")



So. That is quite odd for someone who then claims we need "honest critique."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Quit calling it hero worship just because you disagree
You're just name calling. Make your case against Afghanistan. If you can't do it without calling names, you don't have much of an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. There, now...feel better?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. Error: You've already unrecommended this post.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
39. The President has been knocked off his "pedestal" so many times
with "honest" critique, till it ain't even funny.
The man's feet has been held to so much fire, he can barely walk
us to the finish line on the agenda that we elected him to get done.

You don't have to personally like this President, or you can,
but It seems to me that in a free country, you don't get to tell
other people how they should feel. The media does that everyday....
which is why I don't even bother to watch them anymore.
why would we need you to do it some more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
40. You can bet blood or money, if McCain was in the White House and announced troop escalation

This board would be UNITED in opposition.

The beauty of Obama - they hit the reset button.

What people would no longer tolerate under Bush and the Republicans, they are letting slide under the Obama brand....

Only so long until that won't work, either.

When the democratic party splits in two, we will have real change...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
43. Wasn't that an anti-Obama GOP TV ad during the campaign?
yup

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. beware the modsquad
and their celebrity-loving locks of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC