© = No

[Rusty5329]

After we covered the Stop Stupak rally and lobby day, we were shocked to find our pictures being used by the anti-choice Jill Stanek blog. Now, our pictures are copyrighted. And Jill Stanek had neglected to ask our permission to reprint them. What was even more "fun," was what we found on the contact page at her blog:

continued at: http://sumofchange.blogspot.com/2009/12/no.html

[ManiacJoe]

1. Filing the appropriate complaint with the ISP of the blog site

tends to solve that problem quite quickly.

[Ms. Toad]

2. Here's a link that might help.

http://labnol.blogspot.com/2007/09/dmca-notice-of-copyright-infringement.html

Tends to work better than arguing with people who don't have a clue about copyright law.

[Rusty5329]

3. thanks...

that link is a great resource. Definitely sharing that with friends.

[DavidDvorkin]

4. It's a common misconception that providing attribution makes it okay to violate copyright

I think I've run into that on DU in the past.

[Rusty5329]

5. rolling on the floor laughing...

so funny.