Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rahm Emanual: $18 mill in 3 yrs in Wall Street Leveraged Buy-Out Firm:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 06:21 PM
Original message
Rahm Emanual: $18 mill in 3 yrs in Wall Street Leveraged Buy-Out Firm:
"Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, collected $18 million working less than three years at Wall Street outfit Wasserstein-Perella. I don’t think, after googling the firm, that anyone has adequately explained just what Wasserstein-Perella is. (I was writing about this stuff back in the late 1980s, so I know.) Bruce Wasserstein was one of the top leveraged buyout bandits of the 1980s, when America’s industrial companies were literally asset stripped and ripped apart. The amount of human misery Bruce Wasserstein caused with his "financial engineering" in former industrial towns from Akron to Zanesville is simply beyond imagination, but not exaggeration. After making a few billion ripping apart our country’s industrial base and looting pension funds, Wasserstein became head of Lazard Freres, the secretive but extremely powerful international private banking firm....."

snip

plus further evidence supporting Taibbi's claims:

<http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/12/11/813139/-Taibbi-details-Rubin-clones-around-Obama;-I-add-some-history->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. And tht is what Obama is letting Emmanuel do to this country.
Sell it out to corporate raiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Needed: complete turnover in economic advisers
Edited on Fri Dec-11-09 08:42 PM by cilla4progress
Trade in Geithner for Elizabeth Warren; Emmanuel for Reich. Bring in Krugman, Steiglitz? Who else?

They all have credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Rahm isn't an economic advisor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. rahm fought Dean all the way ... putting in progressives...rahm put
in the blue dogs...and if it wasn't for Dean we would have many more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well
That explains a lot about how Obama has been coerced into looking the other way.

So what are the chances Rahm gets his just due and looks for another job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. So Rahm Emanual's HERO is Gordon Gekko.
So, did Obama choose him or was Obama told to choose him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Rahm was sought by the President Elect
Rahm's goal in life was to be the first Jewish-American Speaker of the House. The President interrupted that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. But was Obama told to choose him?
I'm curious, because Obama says he is working for and fighting for the average American, but the people he surrounds himself with, are the ones out to destroy average Americans with their ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think if someone was trying to hide their poker hand
Edited on Sat Dec-12-09 10:20 AM by AllentownJake
They could have picked someone more innocuous than Rahm Emmanuel.

He's a controversial figure. Rahm is a pit bull, so is Axelrod and Ploufe. It is consistent with previous strategies and I don't doubt in anyway that Rahm does not work for the President not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The buck stops where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. In Rahm's bank account?
Where it has plenty of company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R Thanks for posting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's number one draft pick.
The day after the elections, when I was on top of the world, my heart sunk knowing what was about to happen to our party and our country. Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. That's exactly how I felt. On top of the world one day, sick at heart
the next. Rahm was Obama's message to Wall st. and Corporate crooks; "We've got your back".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. One wonders...
Exactly what Rahm learned all those years in government as a White House staffer under Clinton that made him so valuable to such a firm. Perhaps there's an overlooked career track for investment success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is it any wonder that the elite neither know nor care of the challenges that ordinary people face?
Seriously, how can someone who made six million dollars a year have any idea what it's like to live on twenty thousand a year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rahm was on the board of directors at Freddie Mac
Edited on Sat Dec-12-09 12:43 PM by rollingrock
and probably one of the architects of the current US mortgage/banking crisis.




Emanuel was named to the Board of Directors for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") by then President Bill Clinton in 2000. His position earned him at least $320,000, including later stock sales.<31><32> He was not assigned to any of the board's working committees, and the Board met no more than six times per year.<32>

During his time on the board, Freddie Mac was plagued with scandals involving campaign contributions and accounting irregularities.<32><33> The Obama Administration rejected a request under the Freedom of Information Act to review Freddie Mac board minutes and correspondence during Emanuel's time as a director.<32>

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) later accused the board of having "failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention." Emanuel resigned from the board in 2001 when he ran for Congress.<34>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahm_Emanuel



so much for transparency!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. thanks for that info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trekologer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I don't think that there was much involvement
The boards of directors of companies generally have little to do with the average day-to-day operations; they are mostly involved in high-level stuff. Also, the source indicates that Rham Emanual wasn't on any of the board's committees (aka he didn't do much). I would suspect based on this that Emanual's position on the board was more to give the company the prestige of having a high-level White House staffer involved and/or a post-administration job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. >$320k is a whole lot of money for doing nothing
so why did the Obama WH reject the FOIA request to reviews Rahm's time on the board? what are they trying to hide??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trekologer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. As is the case with boards of directors
I don't disagree that members of boards of directors get paid a lot of money to do very little. Mostly they are being paid to have their name attached to the company.

As far as the FOIA request, Freddie Mac is a private company. Even though it was placed under conservatorship, its still private. I believe that it would be improper to fulfill the request. Now, if the company was nationalized, that would be another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Freddie Mac was put under a conservatorship of the U.S. Federal government 9/08
The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), known as Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), is a government sponsored enterprise (GSE) of the United States federal government. Freddie Mac has its headquarters in the Tyson's Corner CDP in unincorporated Fairfax County, Virginia.<1><2>

The FHLMC was created in 1970 to expand the secondary market for mortgages in the US.

In 1968, Fannie Mae split into a private corporation and a publicly financed institution. The private corporation was still called Fannie Mae, and its charter continued to support the purchase of mortgages from savings and loan associations and other depository institutions, but without an explicit insurance policy that guaranteed the value of the mortgages. The publicly financed institution was named the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) and it explicitly guaranteed the repayments of securities backed by mortgages made to government employees or veterans (the mortgages themselves were also guaranteed by other government organizations).

To provide competition for the newly private Fannie Mae and to further increase the availability of funds to finance mortgages and home ownership, Congress then established the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) as a private corporation through the Emergency Home Finance Act of 1970. The charter of Freddie Mac was essentially the same as Fannie Mae's newly private charter: to expand the secondary market for mortgages and mortgage backed securities by buying mortgages made by savings and loan associations and other depository institutions.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act ("FIRREA") of 1991 revised and standardized the regulation of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Prior to this act, Freddie Mac was owned by the Federal Home Loan Bank System and governed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, which was reorganized into the Office of Thrift Supervision by the Act. The Act severed Freddie Mac's ties to the Federal Home Loan Bank System, created an 18-member board of directors, and subjected it to HUD oversight.

On September 7, 2008, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) director James B. Lockhart III announced he had put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under the conservatorship of the FHFA (see Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). The action has been described as "one of the most sweeping government interventions in private financial markets in decades".<3><4><5>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddie_Mac

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC