Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 marshals shot, gunman apprehended in shooting at federal building in Las Vegas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:51 AM
Original message
2 marshals shot, gunman apprehended in shooting at federal building in Las Vegas
http://www.the33tv.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-us-federal-building-shooting,0,4880106.story

By Associated Press
10:37 AM CST, January 4, 2010

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A deputy U.S. marshal says at least two federal marshals were shot and a gunman was apprehended after gunfire broke out in the lobby of a federal courthouse in downtown Las Vegas.

Chief Deputy Marshal Roxanna Lea Irwin said Monday she didn't have immediate information about the condition of the marshals. But she says authorities had a shooter in custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another clear reminder that aggressive gun control
must be a part of the President's first term agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed but..
The gun nuts would just go nuts as they will on your comments and mine.


:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How do people really think that we don't need more gun control??
I have never heard a good argument from those who love to own firearms. The whole "I want to protect my family" meme would not apply if all guns were banned. The "Only criminals would have guns if they were illegal" argument would be such a small number it really would not matter. Only those sworn to protect us should be allowed to possess firearms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am sworn to protect my family...
"Only those sworn to protect us..."

Is it too early for some rational thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So you honestly believe that criminals would pose no threat without firearms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They would pose much less a threat if they were not armed with a gun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. How would this be done?
Since most gun crimes are committed by those who are banned from owning them already (murder is only rarely a first felony) how would we remove them? Let's say we stop the importatioon or manufacture of guns today. We have about 300 million of them out there. Billions of rounds of ammunition (and thousands of people who make their own). We can assume they will not all be handed on in any amnesty - even by previously legal and safe owners. Much less so by violent criminals who commit most of the murders and to whom a gun in a gunless world will be enormously valuable as they can essentially impose their will unopposed. How do we gte the rest? House to house searches including metal detectors to get them hidden under ground or inside walls? Under what legal and constitutional authority and at what cost?

So we do the police state thing and get most of them, maybe, if we're lucky, with few deaths. Now you only have to contend with the fact that you can manufacture a 1911 (standard military sidearm for decades) from easily available and widely disseminated blueprints from stainless steel in a reasonably equipped machine shop. In fact the best gun I have ever owned was made just that way. Hundreds of gunsmiths have this down to an art. Thousands of people have the skills to develop that art. Do we kill them so they forget it? Or do we ban stainless steel?

Other countries had nowhere near the inventory of guns we do, nowhere near the gunsmithing knowledge and pro/amateur Shade Tree industry of making guns and ammunition we do. Also nowhere near the shared history and ethos of civilian gun ownership. England's guns were limited to the rural farmers, landed gentry and some highly specialized hobbyists. Australia's guns were much the same except for the landed gentry. They were not a routine part of the mainstream culture for the masses of common people.

The US gun genie is not going back into the bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. What do you supposed they would arm themselves with if gun were unavailable?
Not that guns will ever be unavailable to criminals but for arguments sake we'll go with your hypothetical situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Police officers and agents of the state have NO obligation to protect or assist
citizens. Unless you are in thier custody, they are not required to provide you with assistence or protect you. There have been several cases affirming this fact and all are easily researched. I suggest you rethink your position before entrusting your protection to people not obligated to protect you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Your reasoning is clearly flawed, look at the UK
Guns were seriously restricted and the bad boys turned to knives. Know they are look at banning knives. Clue to the UK...its not the weapons, its the bad guys.

The meme of "if we only banned guns, no one would need to protect themselves or their family" is clearly discredited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. And I've never heard a good argument from a gun grabber.
As a gun owner, why should I be punished from someone else's crimes?

"Only those sworn to protect us should be allowed to possess firearms."

Careful, your authoritarianism is showing. What other rights do we not deserve?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. Good luck with that law
it would be the last one passed before those who passed it were ejected from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here we go!
Strap in people, it's gonna be one hellava ride. :rofl: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Every time a deadly car accident happens thats a reminder we must ban all cars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This was no accident.
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 12:33 PM by Iggo
Thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks for missing the point entirely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Oh I didn't miss it.
As a licensed driver, I drove around it in my registered car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes, your car is registered...
But every idiot out there owns one and uses it regularly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. And as a licensed CHL holder, I take my gun out in public..
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 01:01 PM by X_Digger
.. but my dad doesn't register his farm truck that only drives on farm roads, nor does he 'register' the guns that he has that he only takes hunting or target shooting.

Hey, did you get a background check when you bought your car? No? Did you get fingerprinted when you got your tags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I got a background check and I got fingerprinted (thumbprint)...
...when I got my license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Did the state DMV run an FBI background check on you?
Did you have to list every address you've had in the last five years so that they could do a criminal records check on you in every county / state where you lived in that time? Did the car dealership refuse to sell you a car because you had a DUI or refuse to sell you a sports car because you weren't 21?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Clever. But still missing the point entirely
everytime someone drives drunk and kills someone you can say that's also no accident. More people die each day from cars then they do from guns. People will be idiots always, you can't start banning things based on that alone. If you did we would live in a very dull world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:35 PM
Original message
I didn't call for a ban on anything.
Just pointing out that murder is not an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. That's fine, and you are right. But you are completely changing the topic from my point
using this incident as an argument for banning guns is the same as using a drunk driving "accident" as a basis for banning booze or banning cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oops...extra click...sorry.
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 01:36 PM by Iggo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. except weapons and vehicles are quite different
in that one is designed to kill and the other isn't. Also, this was no accident and comparing murder with intent to an accident to make your point is extremely disingenuous. Guns aren't the problem, people are, that's why most sane individuals want better regulation on guns. A gun takes away no just life, but your right to live, therefore it should be regulated, just like a well armed militia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. List the regulations you would add..(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. If it's a part of Obama's first term agenda...
it will be is last term.

How soon we forget the repercussions of actions taken in 1994.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. You want him to be a one-term President?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. it's on the news now
one US Marshall shot and one retired police officer, 65, who is a guard at the federal courthouse. The gunman is dead-he was shot, apparently while fleeing. One witness said she saw four men in black coats, but the news is attributing the shooting to one lone gunman. The news is saying he was wearing combat boots and maybe some camo clothing. They've closed off a couple of streets near the building.

I've been at the building reporting for jury duty--I remember the elder guard--he was nice and was very helpful when I had questions on where to go (it may be the same person who was shot.)

The US Marshall has been rushed to the hospital--no news on him, yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Best wishes for the Marshal & condolences for the officer's family. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Sad it took that long for someone to say that. And I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R.....I see the pro-gun spin control is already at work in this thread.
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 02:41 PM by marmar
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Actually the gun control crowd got on the soapbox, others just responded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Over one hundred million Americans own guns - biased much? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. One officer has died
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Sad. What a shame. My prayers are with his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC