Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Martha Coakley is a REAL Democrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:01 PM
Original message
Martha Coakley is a REAL Democrat
She wasn't my first choice in the primary. (she was my #2 choice) Perhaps she is not your idea of a "perfect" candidate. (Clue: There is no such thing.) But those of you who are portraying her as some sort of DINO are talking out your ass. She has been the AG of my state for several years. Yes, she's a bit of a dispassionate technocrat. But we have a tendency to elect those types here in Mass.

Unless you really want to see "Cosmo boy" Scott Brown in the Senate, do something to help elect Martha, ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R - Very well said - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's not a DINO... she's just a truly awful campaigner
She was also egotistical (or short sighted or whatever) enough to think that she would just be handed the seat and didn't have to work for it.

Here's hoping the lesson isn't politically fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She has won statewide elections here twice already
Although Teddy was the exception, we don't tend to elect showy types here. (See Dukakis, Mike and Tsongas, Paul)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You don't have to be "showy" to be a good campaigner...
...you just need to show up. She didn't.

As for winning other statewide races... I think it was once (primaries don't count), and she didn't have to do it on her own merits. Democrats showed up to vote for the upper end of the ticket and picked the "D" for her race. Note that the other down-ballot democrats (Galvin, Cahill, DeNucci) were in the low-to-mid 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She's on her 2nd term as AG
I think she first won in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. She reminds me of WA State governor Christine Gregoire
She was a successful state AG first, but ran a poor campaign in 2004, winning by a handful of votes. An LTE written by a typical low information voter said that he voted for Gregoire as AG because she had a "pit bull personality," but that he voted for her opponent as governor because of his "sunny personality." I'm betting that Coakely is dealing with this kind of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I believe that she was a DA until 2007. N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. No - She has been AG since winning in 2004
She used to be DA of the county where I live. I know my own elected officials, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Maybe you know your elected officials and just don't know your years?
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 03:34 PM by FBaggins
She was first elected as AG in November of 2006. Thomas Reilly (who she also replaced as Middlesex DA in 1999) was AG until 2007.

MA didn't even have a state office election in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shopgreen Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope that Obama can get the Dems to the poll with his rally tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes she is
Capuano was our choice in the primaries, but once Martha got the nod, we were squarely behind her. Yes, she ran a bad campaign, but blame needsto go to the Dem leadership, too, in-state and nationally. They were all asleep at the switch and let Brown slip under the radar. Be that as it may, we need to do all we can now to bring her across the finish line, because crappy campaign notwithstanding, she will be a fine Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Capuano was my first choice as well
But I agree, Coakley will make a fine Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. A Democrat MUST win in Mass not a nude far right winger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. And real Democrats right now are supporting a disastrous health insurance giveaway
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That statement should make you think
"Hmm. I thought that the current bill is a disastrous health insurance giveaway. But wait a minute. Every single Democrat in the Senate supported it. Even Bernie Sanders supported it. Maybe instead of every single Senate Democrat being wrong, maybe I am the one that is wrong, and maybe the bill is actually a reasonably good bill."

But I doubt it. You will probably continue thinking that you are right, every single Democratic elected official is wrong, and that all the evidence to the contrary is mistaken. To you, the more Democrats that vote for the bill, the more Democrats are wrong/corrupt/whatever (as opposed to each additional progressive voting for the bill indicating that you are more and more wrong).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Scott Brown vs Martha Coakley on the issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC