Tucker the F*cker: 'The (Dem.) leadership is embarrassed by the whackos (Kucinich).'

[rec_report]

MSNBC's Tucker Carlson, aka Tucker the F*cker, stated that Kucinich 'stands alone' in his call for impeachment of Ice Resident, Dick Cheney.

People need to let Tucker the F*cker that he is wrong:
[e-mail]

BTW, the 'Democratic' strategist on the program, Peter Fenn, was of *no* help to Democrats, either. Why are these know-nothing, do-nothing 'analysts' considered Democratic 'strategists, when they are *neither?*
Cheers,
Polar Bear

Click here for news.

[tcfrogs]

1. Have any other congresscritters offered public support for Kucinich yet? n/t

[la la]

2. and why do they chuckle

at the lame comments tfucker throws out? Losers -or seriesly loosers--all of them!

[rec_report]

4. I know, it's aggravating. I like to get 'news' on cable TV, and Faux...

and CNN are even more *useless* at that hour.
Polar Bear

[MadBadger]

3. You are dead wrong

Fenn is representing the opinions of the dems in the house such as Nancy Pelosi.

[rec_report]

6. Ok, well - I would rather the pundits often include Dems. on the 'left' side...

of the party.
I realize that the Democratic party has the 'big tent' approach, but the 'big tent' needs to include some 'leftist' Democrats, as well.
Just my .02.
Polar Bear

[MadBadger]

12. But think about it, how many people in Washington are actually supporting impeachment?

[kimmerspixelated]

15. probably a lot more than the MSM is allowed to report.

[MadBadger]

18. I know our Speaker doesnt support it.

[RaleighNCDUer]

10. And since when do congresscritters represent the people?

It takes a full year after the majority of the populace says we should pull out of Iraq for the Dem congresscritters to tentatively take baby steps at getting us out.

The people ARE the curve, which the the congresscritters are way behind.

How many people out there would favor impeachment if they knew they'd get the support of their congresscritters? Meanwhile, how many congresscritters are hesitating to support impeachment because they keep hearing people saying that it won't succeed, regardless that the people saying that are basing their opinions on the hesitant congresscritters?\

Kudos to DK for taking a stand. The tens of thousands that we see with "Impeach" signs at every rally are evidence that there is support for it. Despite Pelosi et al preemptively taking it off the table.

[MadBadger]

5. Oh, and Peter Fenn is a STRATEGIST for a reason

because he understands that politically, impeachment isnt good strategy.

[rec_report]

9. Oh, Ok. Did the GOP care about 'strategy,' when impeaching Bill Clinton...

for consensual sex?
BTW, impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney as 'bad strategy' is a position that the Reichwing frequently asserts.
Cheers,
Polar Bear

[OHdem10]

16. Gop had a well orchestrated strategy

I have posted a thread--Impeachment--here is the work it takes"
posted at GDPolitics and is currently on GD.

Takes lots of Grassroots organizing.

[RaleighNCDUer]

13. These "strategists' worked to subvert Dean's 50 state strategy

which wound up being responsible for our success in 06. These 'strategists' spout the DLC line which has cost us election after election.

Ever think that maybe these 'strategists' might be 'wrong'?

[MadBadger]

17. Not when I agree with them

I think it will hurt the dems politically if we try to impeach him, especially since there is no way Cheney/Bush will be removed from office.

[rec_report]

19. I agree that Bush bin Laden would attack the US, rather than allow...

the removal of himself, Cheney Halliburton, or KKKarl Rove.
In that regard, I agree with you.
However, any efforts by elected officials to take a stand and try to impeach these maggots (on the record), should be applauded.
It's also worthy to note that Bush and Cheney can't actually be 'impeached,' as they were never 'elected.' Impeachment, by definition, applies only to elected officials.
Cheers,
Polar Bear

[zbdent]

7. Gee ... is that why so many Republicans campaigned in 2006 with

Bush appearing at all their events?

And is that the reason why the Repukes are keeping so close to Bush's policies?

[Marnieworld]

8. So I'm sure they went point by point and refuted Kucinich's articles yes?

I didn't think so.

How can they be wacky when they are 100% true and he has evidence to prove it. They always resort to name-calling when they can't fight the facts.

[rec_report]

11. No. And often, the Democratic 'strategists' merely nod their heads...

in agreement with their Reichwing hosts.
I am so sick of these sycophants.
Polar Bear

[ends_dont_justify]

14. Hey hey, let's make this a positive statement

It means that when the entire congress doesn't support the pres or vice president on something, they're complete whackos. It means when the country gives him an isolated polling number in his favor, that he's a complete whacko. And when it comes to who's the bigger whacko, the administration wins. Just keep pelting it back at 'em ;)