Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's a freeper that knows all about tapping Federal phones........FBI HELLO!!!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:30 AM
Original message
Here's a freeper that knows all about tapping Federal phones........FBI HELLO!!!!!!!
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 09:41 AM by Joanne98
To: Behind Liberal Lines

Steve Reyes? They decided to get an Hispanic agent who works with violent crimes to handle this one.
No one was armed, and it was WITHIN the defense perimeter of a federal building. Guards let these guys in ~ or there's a far more serious problem than is so far reported.

The US Marshalls Service would undoubtedly have picked this guy because they believe he'll do what "the man" says to do with no independent thought ~ (Which is a belief of his management, not mine. I've found any number of Hispanics over the years who are not terribly totalitarian).

So, a frameup? Need to see the directories on the cellphones, but most likely it was.

Here's how to do this if you ever need to know. Remember that every federal office of any kind is under a dicta that two things be done in setting up their office PBX. First, set it so it does not RESPOND WITH THE PHONE NUMBER. That's a no-no of the first kind. Secondly, make sure you deal with the issue of outside foreign contact or you'll be paying phone bills to Bulgaria for gambling interests and wholesale dopedealers.

Other than that they all operate the same way. Most PBX's use some variant of AT&T's Unix Operating System.

There's a problem area when it comes to these Congressional Offices. The guy answering the phone has a constituent on the line and the constituent expects the number dialed to show up in his screen ~ if it doesn't, he won't believe you're real.

So, Senator's field offices like this one usually aren't set up correctly. Likely they aren't set up to control the foreign calls either. Which is a pretty good indication the PBX is susceptible to hacking from OUTSIDE.

That means that what you want to do is dial the DIN, provide the correct signal to give you access to the PC that sets up the PBX, and just give yourself a line that only you can call. You set this line to answer to ALL lines in the office, and that way you are going to eventually pick up a bit of everything going on, but a whole lot of what the US Senator at the other end in DC is telling her field office.

DO NOT GO IN THE FEDERAL BUILDING.

You'll probably have to pay somebody to compute the DIN for you, but knowing that phone companies issue phone numbers to federal offices 20 in a block, just find the lowest sequential number that will call that office, and it'll be the one ending in "00" that's otherwise not used for calling.

If Senators were less arrogant and their staff people more honest this couldn't happen. GSA can do nothing about it.

These guys were up to something other than tapping the Senator's phone BTW. Modern digital systems are just nasty at the handset, and if you hit the blocks in the wireroom, you stand a good chance of finding the wire with the 210 hooked up to it. Lots of practical jokers out there.

This is not a job you do without knowing a whole lot about modern phone systems and PBXs. I would recommend reading through this website to find out how hard a job you've got ahead of you ~ except with almost any US Senator's office ~ http://www.gphone.com/Hosted-PBX/Hosted-PBX.aspx?cid=hosted-pbx-faq


71 posted on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 4:33:00 PM by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies>

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2437829/posts?q=1&;page=51

Kinda interesting maybe all the dems should start checking their phonelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed, no surprise if this isn't the first time for this crew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, the guy can't know too much.
Most federal telephone systems are purchased through NASA's SEWP program, now, not the GSA.

The SEWP contract is specifically designed to allow the federal government to purchase technical equipment (phones are technical equipment now, given their improved technology) at a competitive price and much more quickly than through the GSA. Adding product to the GSA is like pulling eye teeth, but SEWP enjoys a swift 24-hour turn-around. In other words, a vendor/contract holder can request to have a Cisco telephone system put onto the SEWP contract on Tuesday and have it on contract by Wednesday so the contract holder can send his/her proposal to XYZ Federal Agency by Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And many ride T-1's. Much too complicated for their feeble minds to work with.



They wouldn't know where to begin.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Incredible paranoia...yup, the entire government was after this clown...
Evil ACORN at work again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC