Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuba's public "privatization" debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 02:22 PM
Original message
Cuba's public "privatization" debate
Source: Global Post

But in recent months, Granma (Cuba's largest newspaper) has become an unlikely forum for a debate that seems to portend much-expected reforms to Cuba’s state-run economy. Most surprising, at least for the pages of Granma, is that many of the editorials contain rather frank criticisms of Cuba’s economic ills, which include petty corruption, the widespread theft of state goods and a low-wage system that pushes Cubans into black-market activity to make ends meet.

A flurry of op-ed columns have appeared lately in the paper’s “letters to the editor” section, staking out positions for and against something Cubans are calling “privatization” — small-scale liberalization measures that might allow more entrepreneurship and private business. At its roots, it is an argument over how to revive Cuba’s anemic economy, which was already woefully inefficient and unproductive before the global recession hit.

“What would it mean for the State to eliminate the ongoing farce of state-owned property?” asked one letter, signed by D. Gonzalez de la Cruz. Pilfering is so rife at state-run businesses that they’re already being privatized, he argued. “In our current situation, privatization is already happening” Gonzalez wrote. “Only instead of a rational and well-thought-out process, it’s chaotic and perverse. What kind of social benefits do we get from state-run business and restaurants where the State pays the bills but the profits — obtained fraudulently and illegally — go into the pockets of the those who prey off the people and the State?”

Since Raul Castro officially took over Cuba’s presidency from his elder brother in 2008, his government has enacted modest reforms to Cuba’s agricultural sector, putting unproductive state land in the hands of private farmers and cooperatives. But many services and small businesses — from watch repair to fast-food restaurants to bakeries — remain in state hands.

And yet, if “privatization” is being floated in Granma and other official newspapers, does it indicate some package of liberalization measures have already been decided upon by the Castro government? “I think these are changes that almost everyone supports, including many Communist Party militants, but I don’t know when they may occur” said dissident economist Oscar Espinosa Chepe, who said he has been followed the debates “with great interest.”

Read more: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/cuba/100205/privatization-granma-liberalization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Hope Cuba Doesn't Privatize The Way Russia Did
I hope that Cuba doesn't privatize the way that Russia did after the collapse of the old Soviet Union (Good riddance to the latter)! I'd be very sad to see Cuba's state-owned enterprises handed out to connected cronies in a tropicalized version of the Russian oligarchs' big grab.

I really don't see Cuba's current centralized state socialism as being particularly viable in the long term, especially in the face of a decaying national infrastructure and mounting international debt.

Cuba would be better off privatizing a lot of the smaller firms, and in letting them do it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDFbunny Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. After the Soviet collapse
tycoons and mineral barons suddenly appeared. We can hope for a fair redistribution but I think Castro's cronies will get the spoils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Of course, 90% of the problems with Russia's privatization was that
it was more or less controlled by western monetary policy - if they wanted loans or assistance they had to do it in line with the wishes of neo-con banksters. Between that, and the fact that the only capitalists in the country were criminal black-marketers, they were pretty well fucked from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC