Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What you get for 629K in SF

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:32 PM
Original message
What you get for 629K in SF


Hurray, a home in coveted Noe Valley that falls within median! 469 Valley Street is a 4 bed, 2 bath cottage with nice views. Too bad the view of the house itself looks like this, a view which brings to mind hundreds of thousands of dollars in repair/upgrades/new construction:

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ontheblock/detail?entry_id=56792#ixzz0f62dsM3e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Location, Location, Location?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. The view (out the back door) looks awesome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh my... I just got a 2nd heart. THANK U
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I met a bartender the other night
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 09:42 PM by LuvNewcastle
who just moved here from Oakland. I asked him what brought him down this way and he said he could make the same wages and live at half the cost. Can't argue with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Almost looks like a shack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 'til you look closer. It's actually a nice little brick house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech9413 Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. That's not brick, it's stone
In either case I wouldn't pay that much for that little no matter how well it's built. If you want to live there and think it's worth the price, have at it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. It may be brick. It's not gonna be stone in SF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Your paying for the land, and I suspect the view, not the house /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. 200K in improvements and I bet you could flip this for over a million
Noe Valley property is prime real estate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. If there are no serious structural problems
$50K might make it barely livable with a certain amount of sweat equity, sheetrock finishing, painting and the like. $100G would make it very nice, and $150G would make it quite a little McMansion.

But yeah, it's a dump. My guess is that anyone who buys it will be buying the land, knock it down, and start over, building something completely out of scale and out of character for the rest of the area.

I'll bet the place was over a million 4 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Zoning would bar that from happening.
#1 - the neighbors will probably fight to designate the building as "historical". Losing that,
#2 - zoning for new construction mandates that the building be no higher than any other building on the block, and,
#3 - it must maintain a certain percentage of open space, I believe now it is 25% of the lot.
#4 - it probably won't qualify for a garage curb cut-out because San Francisco has a transit first policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Such a deal! That's usually just the lot price.

people just tear the "house" down and build a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. That there is known as a tear-down. The land is worth the purchase price to many with money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow that is an expensive market...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. That is why San Francisco is 70% renters.
Only 10% of the residents who live here can afford to buy property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. 4 bed, 2 bath?
That's practically a mansion by Bay Area standards for that price. Is that a misprint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Most likely, the rest of house steps down the hill behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. it may not be a tear down
the picture from google street view makes it look *way nicer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd rather live in a 40' motorcoach towing my Ferrari F430 behind it
in a custom trailer.

Living in a world without property setbacks? No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. That ain't nothing
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 10:58 PM by Number23
Want a 2-bedroom APARTMENT in Sydney, Australia that looks like it's haunted and has stellar views of parked cars?? $600K


http://www.realestate.com.au/cgi-bin/rsearch?a=o&id=106312881&f=0&p=10&t=res&ty=&fmt=&header=&cc=&c=82236628&s=nsw&snf=rbs&tm=1265773921
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Whoa. One reason I'd never live there... among many.
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 11:13 PM by cherokeeprogressive
21,000 more dollars before offers/counter offers will get you 3 bd/4.5 bath with 3 car garage and 4500 sq. ft. on a fair size lot where I live in So. Cal.

4 real seasons, 300 days of sunshine per year, and a view of a lake less than a mile away from your house.

That's what I'm talkin' about... living ABOVE the smog at 7000 feet.

(Now, who wants to come shovel my driveway? Two more feet expected tonight!)

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/743-Menlo_Big-Bear-Lake_CA_92315_1106042484

Forgot the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comrade snarky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. It's the neighborhood that makes it expensive
Even by insane SF standards. Noe Valley is extremely popular for some reason. Me? I love the fog so I'm right where I should be.

Here's a house in my neighborhood for 600K. Looks nice, built in 1913 with some original detail, a working fireplace and a 2 car garage. Needs some work of course. :-)

http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/622-27th-Ave-94121/home/1979819

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. That Looks Right Out of District 9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. Is it historic? There may be more to the story. The "shack" look and gingerbread at roof apex
are clues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC