Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Becker nomination blocked: I love this republickan logic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lesleymo Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:34 AM
Original message
Becker nomination blocked: I love this republickan logic
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 07:43 AM by Lesleymo
The GOP, along with Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln, blocked the nomination of Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board, after stalling the process since last April.

Here's their reasoning (if you can even call it reasoning) - first they asked him hundreds of questions. Then they blocked him because he had garnered "a greater level of public scrutiny and larger than usual volumes of questions."

Good grief. And they get away with this stuff?!

From Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/09/carl-levin-filibuster-cou_n_455814.html

The GOP went to great intellectual lengths to find a reason to oppose Becker, a labor lawyer. Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming, the highest-ranking Republican on the committee that approved Becker, presented a novel argument. He noted that Becker had answered hundreds of questions that Republicans had submitted to him, and then used that fact to make the logical leap that he was a questionable nominee.

"If a nominee garners a greater level of public scrutiny and larger than usual volumes of questions, we should ask why. This unique scrutiny should be a signal that the individual has raised a great level of concern and controversy," Enzi argued from the Senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. See, if a ship sails from Portugal heading west and
fails to return, it must have fallen off the edge of the world. Therefore we can state categorically that the Earth is flat and no amount of evidence can alter that fact for them. See, that's how they think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Regardless of whether Sen. Al Franken is involved with this committee or not
I hope he's preparing a scathing critique of these pigs that will be read & entered into the Congressional record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleman Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what your saying is that he is a "questionable" candidate?
Sure that's one way to look at it. Perhaps they should not ask any questions of the next nominee and that person could be "unquestionably" the best possible candidate for the position.
So the question is.....to question or not to question...or is that the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lesleymo Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Question him all you want
but then don't complain that he got too many questions.

Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleman Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nope only answers....just ask me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. According to the Boston Globe, 85 senators voted
Where were the others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC