The GOP, along with Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln, blocked the nomination of Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board, after stalling the process since last April.
Here's their reasoning (if you can even call it reasoning) - first they asked him hundreds of questions. Then they blocked him because he had garnered "a greater level of public scrutiny and larger than usual volumes of questions."
Good grief. And they get away with this stuff?!
From Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/09/carl-levin-filibuster-cou_n_455814.htmlThe GOP went to great intellectual lengths to find a reason to oppose Becker, a labor lawyer. Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming, the highest-ranking Republican on the committee that approved Becker, presented a novel argument. He noted that Becker had answered hundreds of questions that Republicans had submitted to him, and then used that fact to make the logical leap that he was a questionable nominee.
"If a nominee garners a greater level of public scrutiny and larger than usual volumes of questions, we should ask why. This unique scrutiny should be a signal that the individual has raised a great level of concern and controversy," Enzi argued from the Senate floor.