Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The thing that makes me laugh the most, is when people claim this is the fault of liberals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:15 PM
Original message
The thing that makes me laugh the most, is when people claim this is the fault of liberals
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 01:16 PM by AllentownJake
:rofl:

Here is the deal, with everything the administration has wanted to do in 2009 the progressives/liberals have voted it for it and the funny thing is their survival depends the least on it.

I don't recall in August a group of liberal Senators dragging out the Health Care Reform process as long as possible.

I don't recall there needing to be negotiations and pork handed out to liberal Senators and House members to get their vote on stimulus.

I don't recall the liberals throwing a temper tantrum and delaying Finance reform in either body or stripping the rather moderate provisions from the administration's request.

Even Afghanistan. If the liberals really wanted to, they could have made more noise about it in either houses.

I don't recall Dennis getting a bunch of people together to throw a temper tantrum over his single payer amendment and demand a vote on the house floor before the vote on the overall bill, I do recall Bart Stupak doing that.

From what I've seen it appears they've been relative team players. Also, from what I've seen, they are cheaper to the cost of bills than the so called "budget hawk moderates"

Nope, it has been the "moderates" who have slowed everything down to a standstill and demanded things for themselves, and the ironic thing is they claim to have done it in fear for their own "survival" in re-election.

Feingold isn't that worried about re-election and neither is Bernie Sanders, Al Franken (he's got 5 years), Barbara Boxxer should be OK as well. Scott Brown would have never beat Ted Kennedy, but he sure had his way with Coakley who was partying with Health Care lobbyist two weeks before election.

I tell you who is worried. Evan Bayh, he's scared. Mary Landriue terrified, Blance Lincoln, scared.
Ben Nelson, might as well start looking for work now buddy because 2013 looks like your last day. Joe Lieberman, he's going to be the GOP nominee in CT.

See here is how it is going to work in November. All the moderates who have been watering down, watered down legislation further, are all going to have tougher races than most of the "liberals" and here is the deal, the "moderates" are going to be tagged with the watered down legislation regardless if they voted for the watered down of the watered down version. Lastly, if it appears the race is close, their fund raising edge is over because their sponsors aren't giving money to them because they like their ideology, they like their access to said Senator/Representative, and access to another lackey in the Senate or House is just all right with them as well. They should know that, that is how they got there in the first place :rofl:

However, I expect the "liberals" and "progressives" to be blamed for everything.

Good policy is always the best case you can make for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isaiah 32...5-8
Liberals will be known for Liberal things.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a puzzle isn't it?
On the one hand we have Rahm and friends claiming we're irrelevant and not needed - but when things go wrong, it will be our fault.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. well he is kind of right
we are the r word, we should be throwing more temper tantrums, not less, apparently that is how you get what you want from the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love your posts, but people are dying for lack of care based on illogical fear
(and much of it's based in racism). The whole freakin' thing is so sad, pathetic and dark that I can't yet find a way to laugh about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Kurt Vonnegut
"Laughter and tears are both responses to frustration and exhaustion. I myself prefer to laugh, since there is less cleaning up to do afterward." Kurt Vonnegut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I said _I_ am not there yet. Did you misunderstand my post?
Our ability to laugh has absolutely nothing to do with the mopping up that will need to be done after this whole mess. The tears are largely figurative, but the damage to human beings and the environment is literal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is correct
However, the only tone I can take to the oppressors is mocking, anger always gives them a talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. In our political climate there's always the need for an enormous propaganda effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. We would be better off without Bayh, Landriue, Lincoln and both Nelson's.
They give people the false impression the liberals are in charge. We're better off if Republicans do their own dirty work. At least people would know who's in charge and who to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Agreed
I'd prefer republicans stay in the republican party, even if they are uncomfortable with the whack job evangelicals who are trying to set up God's kingdom on earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Some of that bunch aren't even uncomfortable with that.
I don't have the slightest idea why they're Democrats in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC