Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Ancient-Human Genome Sequence Answers Anthropological Riddle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 05:23 PM
Original message
First Ancient-Human Genome Sequence Answers Anthropological Riddle
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/02/inuk-genome/

Meet Inuk, a 4,000-year-old man known from a tuft of hair found in Greenland permafrost.

In those frozen strands, enough DNA was preserved to sequence the first ancient-human genome and confirm an unexpected ancient migration from Siberia to the New World, plus a few of Inuk’s own traits.

Along with brown eyes, brown skin and facial hair, he had “a tendency to baldness,” said Eske Willerslev, a Niels Bohr Institute evolutionary geneticist who led the analysis, published Monday in Nature. “But because we found quite a lot of hair from this guy, we presume that he died young.”

The remains of Inuk — which translates to “person” or “human being” in the Inuit language family — were found in Qeqertasussuk, an archaeological site in southwest Greenland.

Read More http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/02/inuk-genome/#ixzz0fAsIlKJN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. cool. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmmph Baldness!?! --
If you only knew what you started.

Bad, bad man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they can find evidence of the "sons of god" marrying the sons
of man.... they will put to bed some of the most persistent questions known to man... they may even explain the "missing link" thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Sons of God?" Please explain.
This isn't any of that Zechariah Stitchin woo-woo nonsense, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Lemme see..... ah here you go....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_God

Lines of Seth View

One hypothesis is that the sons of God are the descendants of Seth, the pure line of Adam. The daughters of men are then seen as the descendants of Cain. This is the view put forth by the pseudepigraphical work: Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan.
Angelic View

A second hypothesis states that the "sons of God" are a category of fallen angel referred to as Watchers who came to earth and had children with the daughters of men. This union resulted in a race of half-angel, half-human beings known as the Nephilim, and subsequently, the Emim, Rephaim and Anakim.
Etymology-based

A third hypothesis revolves around the fact that "elohim" means god or gods.<1> In the Hebrew "Elohim" is God's name but it is a plural word. Even though the name is more often used with the -im plural suffix while still meaning a singular form, the use of "Ha" before the name (which is the Hebrew equivalent of the word "The") transforms the word into strictly plural, though apologists such as Dr. Chuck Missler<2> regard this as a testament to the Trinity.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's not a 'persistent question', that's a local Iron Age myth
If you're going to say we need to investigate all 3000 year old myths from all cultures, then there'd be no time for real science or archaeology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm saying we need to find out when "mankind" took a quantum
leap so to speak and how it might have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Eastern Siberia to Greenland? Did he take the northern passage?
Eastern Siberia would be closer to Alaska, Greenland closer to Scandanvia. He must have gone over the top, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC