Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The most bizarre murder case I've seen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:23 PM
Original message
The most bizarre murder case I've seen
On January 25, 2006, Daniel Miller (now 19) and Edward Sample (now 20) attacked Jorge Trujillo with a baseball bat. The two attackers perceived Trujillo as a "scrap", ghetto slang for a Mexican national or Sureno gang member. (Sureno is Spanish for "southerner" in case you didn't know.) Trujillo was really a Guatemalan immigrant and not a gang member. 90 minutes later, a blood-soaked Trujillo encountered police; a resident called police to report car burglaries. Because Trujillo was carrying a garden hoe, was reported by the 911 caller to be possibly carrying a weapon, and would not cooperate with the police, officers tased Trujillo in his right leg, right arm, and back 21 times.

The next day, Trujillo died. Former Santa Clara County medical examiner Dr. Christopher Happy ruled that the 21 Taser shots contributed to Trujillo's death. Now chief medical examiner in Milwaukee, Dr. Happy will not testify in the murder trial of Miller and Sample. Also, "fter hearing pretrial arguments from prosecutors and defense attorneys, Judge Jerome E. Brock banned attorneys and witnesses from referring to the exact number of Taser shocks in the presence of the jury."

Prosecutors blame the death of Trujillo on Miller and Sample and accuse them of bragging about their attack. Community activist Raj Jayadev, who opposes what he terms "excessive force" by police (and has earned the ire of some forum members on the San Jose Mercury News site), said about Trujillo: "The amount of force used by the police against him was excessive and led to his death, and yet they are not charged."

Of all the police brutality cases and Taser abuses I've read about in the news and Jonathan Turley's blog, this is just...really really odd.

Source: Tracey Kaplan, "
Trial begins in Taser case". San Jose Mercury News: February 9, 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. They should ALL go to jail for contributing to Trujjillo's death
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Medical Examiner is named Dr. Happy??
totally off topic, but what a name for a coroner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A Urologist would be a better specialization.
Dr. Happy treats Mr. Happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDesertFlower Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait, it gets worse! There's even more involved than this....
The official 'record' says it was actually 4 supposedly present @ the time of attack. 3 of which were supposedly involved in the attack. - 1 of the 4 ended up fingering the other 3.. & UNLIKE the 3 that are now accused - He was not a juvenile, he did have a prior criminal record, he lived in neighborhood where the attack happened, & conveniently he didn't have to face any charges at all in return for his cooperation in turning in the other 3. Huh?! But none of this will be known to very many.
The '2 (alleged) attackers' on trial now were NOT affiliated or in ANY way involved in gang activity. They were just your basic skater punk teens.. From a totally different neighborhood (that has relatively no gang activity).
So there's no motivation for attack based on this reasoning. They wouldn't even have cared if he was or wasn't a 'scrap'.
The attack happened in January 2006. They didn't identify the alleged attackers until Dec. 2006 - After the adult male involved (that I mentioned earlier) fingered them.
The SJPD lost the civil suite already that the victims family filed. The outcome (if they get the cash) is still pending however.. Until this trial is determined. Hmmmmm....
There are literally dozens & dozens of oddities involved beyond this. Procedure thats questionable. Officials in all areas involved that common sense can tell harbor some bias or motivation involved in their decisions. Etc.
Last thing I'll say is that these boys have been incarcerated now for 4 years!! Pending their 'speedy trial'.. Yeah right. Something stinks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC