Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hotheaded Emanuel may be White House voice of reason - washingtonpost.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:13 AM
Original message
Hotheaded Emanuel may be White House voice of reason - washingtonpost.com
IMG]




By Jason Horowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 2, 2010; A01


Hotheaded Emanuel may be White House voice of reason


Some Democrats are blaming the president for not listening more to his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. (Bill O'leary/the Washington Post)


But a contrarian narrative is emerging: Emanuel is a force of political reason within the White House and could have helped the administration avoid its current bind if the president had heeded his advice on some of the most sensitive subjects of the year: health-care reform, jobs and trying alleged terrorists in civilian courts.

It is a view propounded by lawmakers and early supporters of President Obama who are frustrated because they think the administration has gone for the perfect at the expense of the plausible. They believe Emanuel, the town's leading purveyor of four-letter words, a former Israeli army volunteer and a product of a famously argumentative family, was not aggressive enough in trying to persuade a singularly self-assured president and a coterie of true-believer advisers that "change you can believe in" is best pursued through accomplishments you can pass.

---------------------
Listening to Emanuel would serve "all our overall goals," said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.). "I think that Rahm's considerable legislative experience translates into advice that the president should heed."
Instead, Obama went for the historically far-reaching, but more legislatively difficult, achievements that he and his campaign-forged inner circle believe they were sent to Washington to deliver.
'Gut instincts'

In December 2008, Obama, Emanuel and Republican Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) and Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) met in Obama's transition headquarters in Chicago to discuss detainee policy. According to Graham, Obama turned to him at one point and said, " 'I'm going to need your help closing Guantanamo Bay. . . . I want you and Rahm to start talking.' " They did, and as the discussions progressed, Emanuel grew wary that closing the U.S. military prison in Cuba was possible without opening a slew of other politically sensitive national security problems " 'This stuff is like flypaper,' " Graham recalled Emanuel saying. " 'It will stick to you.' "

----------------------------
'Ally in the effort'
What makes Emanuel's position so difficult is that his job requires him to bridge the competing interests of the White House and Congress.
"All our members are up for election this year, and the president is not up for election until 2012," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). "Sometimes there are tensions because of the different timetables."

Van Hollen, who is Emanuel's successor as DCCC chairman and is charged with protecting the House majority Emanuel helped win, said: "There has been some frustration with the administration," especially in the slow pace of tackling unemployment. "From my discussions with Rahm, he has been an ally in the effort to get these things moving quickly and understands it's important that there be progress."
Asked about that tension, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said: "I'm sure there were discussions back and forth, and Rahm, being the operational guy in the room, said, 'Look, this is what we can get, let's get this now, we can pare it down, et cetera.' And I'm sure there were those in the room who said, 'Look, we said during the campaign we were going to do this; we need to get the whole ball of wax.' "

Another senior member of the House Democratic caucus put it more bluntly. "I don't think the White House has listened to him enough," said the member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss frustration with the White House. "There is this growing sense in the House that this White House is tone-deaf and doesn't care about 2010, that it is sacrificing members for 2012 and that the president thinks he doesn't need to get engaged, or that he thinks politics don't matter and that he could care less about what is happening on the streets of our districts. That's not Rahm."

-------------------------------
As health-care negotiations inched along at the end of last year, Emanuel grew impatient about addressing national joblessness concerns. One Democratic senator who wanted to pivot to unemployment said Emanuel shared his thinking. " 'I understand, I understand. We have to get to jobs,' " the senator, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations, recalled Emanuel commiserating. In a meeting with the president and chief of staff, the senator stated his case, but Obama decided the priority was seeing health-care reform through.
"It was the president's call," said the senator, who added that Emanuel showed no trace of objection. "A play was called, and he was running the play."

more at link

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/01/AR2010030103934.html?wpisrc=nl_politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yawn. Shills at WA Post want to retain their inside source.
Same shit, different day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. The 2nd Rahm fellating article from WaPo in a few weeks
I have to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Right, the other one was (predictably) from Milbank.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Emanuel is a force of political reason..."
Edited on Tue Mar-02-10 11:20 AM by Raster

Rahm "gut you like a fish" Emmanuel the voice of political reason?:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. what a total load of bs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. DLC. Citizen of another (controversial) country. Chief of staff.
I get that all right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a
nice try, WAPO douchebags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck Rahm with a chainsaw.
He is one of the worst things to ever happenn to the Democratic party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. How many more reasons does Obama need to get rid of Emanuel?
Transparently airing out your petty grievances in the press (even if it is the execrable Post) is not only a desperation move, but it's definitely an excuse to dismiss. If I were anyone else advising Obama I'd be livid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why wouldn't the Washington Post publishe something that is DLC - the Republican wing
of the Democratic Party. It's what keeps the Party back. They are progressive for their own agenda.

Who cares what Debbie Wasserman-Schultz thinks.

I know I am not infallible because I thought she was the hottest thing that happened to the Dem Party when she first arrived on the rado and tv and the floor of the House. Boy, was I wrong in forming that opinion.

So, of course a piece in the WP to promote the DLC would include her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. "Boy, was I wrong in forming that opinion."
I heard that! Initially I was very imnpressed with her, but have come to view her with a very jaundiced eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Some DU heads exploding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Hmmm. All I see is a lot of people pegging the article for just what it is
A DLC friendly puff piece from a DLC mouthpiece publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Rahm got one of his toadies in the press to write this crap.
The guy should be drummed out of journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC