Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repost ... more 3,000 violations @ the Massey mine (Performance Coal Co.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:19 AM
Original message
Repost ... more 3,000 violations @ the Massey mine (Performance Coal Co.)
Thanx to DUer Adenoid_Hynkel for posting this 1st.

Source: Charleston Daily Mail

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Safety inspectors concluded as recently as last month that conditions at Massey Energy Co.'s Upper Big Branch mine posed substantial and significant risks to miner well-being before a Monday explosion killed at least 12 miners and trapped nearly 10.

In March alone, U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration officials cited the mine, which is owned by Massey subsidiary Performance Coal Co., for failing to control dust; improperly planning to ventilate the mine of dust and the combustible gas methane; inadequate protection from roof falls; failing to maintain proper escapeways; and allowing the accumulation of combustible materials.

Since 1995, there have been more than 3,000 violations at Upper Big Branch, though it was not immediately clear how that compared to other mines of its size.

Of the $1.5 million in penalties MSHA proposed since 2007, Massey has actually paid less than $300,000.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.com/News/statenews/201004060029
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how you never hear of a mine that's fully in compliance.
And you never hear about a mine owner who's really dedicated to the safety of the workers.

I mean, the story is never "The explosion occurred despite the mine's careful adherence to safety regulations."


I'm sure that such mines and such owners exist out there in small numbers, but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. From the article
Company officials did not respond to a message asking about the mine's safety record, but Massey
CEO Don Blankenship said in a statement that the company's "top priority is the safety of our miners
and the well-being of their families."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The things you stated is why we don't hear about them
probably they, if they exist that is are union too.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's because there are no unions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Once again the Corporate Media fails the people. For at least the
last 3 Mine Collapses, many of the same issues are breathlessly
reported after the people are dead.

Where was the reporting on safety violation before the Accident??

Now we know that Methane Gas gums up the works in the Mining
Accidents. Will there be one Reporter who stays on this
story to see if the Mine Owners make improvements and do
they find a way to have continuing venting of the Methane
thus avoiding buildups and killing people if an accident
occurs.

Sure Congress will have a hearing. Where is the follow through?

The Media and Congress need to think hard about their loyaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC