|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:36 PM Original message |
If BP was negligent, is it liable to all businesses that suffer losses because of the oil spill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. No. Economic damage suits are capped at 75 million total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Is that 75 million total or each? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I believe it is total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thanks. Perhaps someone can elaborate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. added an article that might help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Many, many thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. NYT article > |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Thanks. "no more than $75 million in liability for the damages that might be claimed by individuals, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. The change in the law being proposed today is to raise the cap from $75 million to $10 billion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Why the hell is it capped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. "trade-off" for creating the post Exxon-Valdez industry funded clean-up fund |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I'll have to read up on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:45 PM Original message |
Actually, $75m limit voted in in 1986. 1990 was authorizing the use & funding.z |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. Thanks. (I was reading the NYT litterally) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. It took some digging to flush it out. Lots of bad info out there yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Types of Claims suggests it could be $75 million per claim. see types from your link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Interesting! Thanks for adding another piece to the puzzle! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. 1986 under Reagan. DU discussion link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Thanks -nt- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Thanks for the DU link, it's a start on an issue that all citizens need to understand. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Several Senators started legislation yesterday to raise the $75mm to $10bn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Would that mony be paid by BP or we taxpayers? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. In all likelihood it will apply only to future incidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. They are going to try for retroactive, but with our SCOTUS, it is unsure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Both. The fund is funded on $0.08 a BARREL tax, which is passed onto us at the pump. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. As usual corporations reap profits from good and bad times. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. 'Xactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. How was the Valdez litigation handled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. All Businesses? That Could Be Quite A List... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. Every business and every individual in the country is going to lose one way or another no matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Agree and that's one reason I object to limited liability for corporations particularly when they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
30. "If"? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. There has to be proximate cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. Morally,, YES. But of course the law allows it to weasel out to paying for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. Like Exxon was liable to the Prince William Sound fishermen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC