Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well, ya gotcher Bee Pee, ya gotcher EPA...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:33 PM
Original message
Well, ya gotcher Bee Pee, ya gotcher EPA...
Edited on Thu May-27-10 07:34 PM by LeftyFingerPop
ya gotcher Coast Guard, ya gotcher Bobby Jindal, ya gotcher MMS, ya gotcher parrish presidents, ya gotcher President Obama, ya gotcher NOAA.

Here are the problems:

1) Stopping the flow of oil.

2) Cleaning the oil from both beaches and wetlands.

3) Rescuing and rehabilitating the wildlife.

4) Providing monetary remuneration to everyone impacted.

5) Ensure that clean-up workers are safe.

6) Provide counseling and emotional support to those impacted.

Here's my question: Which one person in the US Government is responsible for tieing this all together? Which one person is responsible for making sure that all of the above tasks are being completed? Has that person set up an office in LA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rec'd but still at 0. What a frigging surprise n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. And it's a valid question too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. And so my friend you have identified the problem with the
Edited on Thu May-27-10 07:50 PM by MadMaddie
massive DHS Organization that the previous administration cobbled together badly.

FEMA would have been the organization to lead a disaster like this if it was still a cabinet position. However; the previous administration destroyed the essence of FEMA by changing it's focus to Terrorism versus responding to disasters.

This is exactly why FEMA needs to be pulled out of DHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree wholeheartedly! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree, MadMaddie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Oh, yes, FEMA
I wondered what happened to them.

Isn't this situation considered... like, an emergency or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It is but because of the way that FEMA
has been cobbled up in DHS the organization does not have the money and structure it once had. If FEMA was a cabinet position the FEMA manager would have been reporting dirctly to the President instead of going through two or three levels.

I am studying this now and it really is appalling how the previous administration almost dismantled FEMA.

There are professional Emergency Managers there now but they lost so much knowledge when Brownie took over they are still recovering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oh, yes, I remember now
FEMA was removed as a cabinet position. I think that was Skeletor (Chertoff) who grabbed that portfolio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think that is what this administration is tone deaf on. They need one person
over seeing those tasks and that person needs to be present in LA and available to the media EVERYDAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. One person would appoint an individual or organization...
to be responsible for each of the TASKS shown in the OP. Each of these individuals would be responsible to develop a quick response plan to attack each of the tasks. These people would then report to the "leader" their progress or lack thereof, on a daily basis.

And yes, the "leader's" job would be to coordinate each of the people below him or her, and to provide input to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. See Post #3
This was FEMA's directive before the previous administration and Brownie came in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If it can't be FEMA, it has to be someone else now...
Whether it be a person or an organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good thought. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. what are you talking about?
The government?

According to people here:

- The government has no expertise.

- The government has no equipment.

- The government has no power.

- The government has no authority.

- The government would just have to hire the same people from private industry anyway, so what's the difference.

- There is no precedent for any such government intervention.

- Government interventions don't work - they are too slow and bureaucratic.

Many here just cannot understand why anyone would ever propose such a goofy idea - that we turn to the government in times of emergency rather than to private companies.

Government - what a silly idea! Who needs it? What can government do that BP can't do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC