Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Experts: Texas textbooks are unlikely to spread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:21 PM
Original message
Experts: Texas textbooks are unlikely to spread
Experts: Texas textbooks are unlikely to spread
By PAUL J. WEBER (AP) – 5 days ago


SAN ANTONIO — Pop quiz: Does the school curriculum adopted in Texas really wind up in textbooks nationwide? If you answered yes, you might get a failing grade.

As the second-largest purchaser of textbooks behind California, the Lone Star State has historically wielded enormous clout in deciding what material appears in classrooms across the country. That's why the state school board's recent decision to adopt new social studies standards was closely watched far beyond Texas.

Critics feared the new, more conservative curriculum in Texas would spread elsewhere. But publishing experts say those concerns are overblown.

"It's easier nowadays to create one edition for one situation and a different edition for another situation," said Bob Resnick, founder of Education Market Research, based in New York. "I don't believe the Texas curriculum will spread anyplace else."

After months of discussion, the Texas Board of Education last week approved placing greater emphasis on the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers and teaching schoolchildren that the words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the Constitution.

In Washington, Education Secretary Arne Duncan called the process a case of politicians deciding curriculum. California lawmakers went a step further, proposing that education officials there comb through textbooks to ensure that Texas material isn't twisting the history curriculum.

This year, as states weigh which textbooks to buy, many "are going to be asking whether this was the book that went to Texas," said Kathy Mickey, an analyst at Simba Information, a market research firm.

The influence of Texas on the $7 billion U.S. textbook market has steadily weakened. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jokmIAwsqG7ypo567h2KHAApqdUAD9G20UN00



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. When accepting students for colleges outside Texas....
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 09:28 PM by aquart
Will the Texas curriculum be considered?

It seems to me that standardized tests can be written to screen for Texas curriculum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Great idea and deserves it's own thread. Why not start a movement
to contact the standardized testing companies and urge that they include questions designed to weed out the Texas brainwashed students?

Also, why not ask the obama administration to establish national testing standards or national text book standards that would ban the sort of crap Texas has done? Why should those poor kids in Texas grow up ignorant in America? Don't we have an obligation to protect them from the morons in their legislature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. One could argue that the good people of TX should be given what they
want and let the chips fall where they may. They will find their children can't get into good colleges and/or good jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Unlikely to Spread"?
The author seems to be referring to Texas textboooks as some kind of communicable disease. Or maybe an oil spill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think it could be argued that what would be spread is the
loads of dis- and misinformation the new textbooks that Texas has approved, if they were to be used all over the country. In that sense, I think "spread" is an apt word to use.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I Was Being Tongue in Cheek
I understand the rumored influence of Texas textbooks on the rest of the country, but the "spread" could make it sound like some kind of noxious influence. Which in most cases it is.

Glad to see it's not happening as much. I went to 6-8th grades in Eastern NC, and the history textbooks we used were written from a Confederate point of view and justified slavery on economic grounds. And this was the mid-60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good.
Leave the ignorance there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. it never dawned on my feeble brain that this really is a non issue
Edited on Sat Jun-05-10 09:55 PM by madrchsod
my family has around 20yrs experience in the printing industry. it`s simple to print textbooks for different states. when i worked on a bindery line we`d have multiple editions for the same magazine.my wife was a roll tender and my son still is.a press can run off impressions for a magazine then change a "plate" and 15 minutes later the press is running different impressions for the same magazine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. From the printer's POV, yes. From the publisher's POV, not so much
As someone with 20+ years on the publisher's side of things, I can tell you they (meaning teh bean counters and people with the actual title "Publisher") don't want the tracking, editing, and warehousing hassles of having many different versions of the same edition of any given volume. POD does help with the problems some, but you'll still be making more books, paying more writing, developmental editing, copyediting and production hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-10 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Make your state reject Texas approved textbooks!
Please! It's bad enough these troglodytes foist this nonsense on Texas children. Don't let it get past our borders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC