Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Review Online falsely claims Kagan "apparently tied" the NRA to the KKK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 09:58 AM
Original message
National Review Online falsely claims Kagan "apparently tied" the NRA to the KKK
Kagan did not tie NRA to KKK

Memo sent to Kagan listed NRA and KKK as two organizations who might not benefit from bill. The National Review Online blog post points to two documents, a memo sent to Kagan and her notes on the memo. The memo dealt with the proposed Volunteer Protection Act, which would limit the tort liability of some non-profits. The memo Kagan received stated that the National Rifle Association and Ku Klux Klan would not receive protection under the act. It later said: "e probably need to be careful about suggesting that 'bad' organizations will qualify for the provision in the bill as it would suggest that we are allowing 'bad' organizations to qualify for tax-exempt status."

In notes following the memo, Kagan did not "tie" the NRA to the KKK. In handwritten notes, Kagan wrote: "Bad guy orgs -- not NRA ... not KKK." Nowhere in the memo or the handwritten notes, did Kagan say that the NRA was "tied" to the KKK.

The year before the memo was written, the NRA had called federal agents "jack-booted government thugs"
In 1995 fund-raising letter, the NRA referred to ATF agents as "jack-booted government thugs." An April 26, 1995 Washington Post article (retrieved from Nexis) reported:


"If you have a badge, you have the government's go-ahead to harass, intimidate, even murder law-abiding citizens," said a recent NRA solicitation letter signed by LaPierre. "Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge . . . Waco and the Branch Davidians. . . . Not too long ago, it was unthinkable for federal agents wearing Nazi bucket helmets and black storm trooper uniforms to attack law-abiding citizens. Not today."

The solicitation calls for lifting the assault weapons ban to even the odds in the struggle between ordinary citizens and "jack-booted government thugs more power to take away our constitutional rights, break in our doors, seize our guns, destroy our property, and even injure or kill us."

NRA's LaPierre reaffirmed "jack-booted government thugs" statement in aftermath of Oklahoma City bombing. The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995. The Associated Press reported on May 1, 1995:

The National Rifle Association's top official defended the inflammatory language his organization has used about federal agents, saying yesterday that references to "jack-booted government thugs" are accurate.

"Those words are not far, in fact they are a pretty close description of what's happening in the real world," NRA Executive Vice President Wayne La- Pierre said on NBC's "Meet the Press." The NRA's attack on federal agents, made in a fund-raising letter, has been cited as an example of the kind of rhetoric that creates a climate for violent acts such as the Oklahoma City bombing. LaPierre insisted that is not the case.

LaPierre subsequently apologized for the "jack-booted government thugs" statement.

George H.W. Bush resigned his membership in NRA over "jack-booted government thugs" comment. Former President George H.W. Bush resigned from the NRA in protest of the "jack-booted thugs" statement.

Visit Link for memo and handwritten notes
http://mediamatters.org/research/201006180041
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC