Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon workers found to have downloaded child pornography

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:30 PM
Original message
Pentagon workers found to have downloaded child pornography
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/24/pentagon-us-staff-downloaded-child-pornography

Dozens of staff and contractors with high-level security clearance put at risk of blackmail by their sex crimes

Dozens of Pentagon staff and contractors with high-level security clearance have been found by US federal investigators to have downloaded child pornography.

A spokesman said the defence department takes such matters seriously but would not comment on specific cases.

The Pentagon concern is not just that crimes have been committed, though that alone would be grounds for dismissal, but that it makes those involved security risks.

One of those charged was a contractor who had security clearance at the National Security Agency, which eavesdrops on communications worldwide. He fled the US and is thought to be hiding in Libya.

Details about links between the Pentagon and child pornography were disclosed yesterday in the Boston Globe.


More at the link ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's use Fox News logic now, shall we?
There are some bad apples at the Pentagon who are using our tax dollars for nefarious purposes. Therefore, the Pentagon should be defunded and shut down.

I think that was their anti-ACORN argument, anyhow, and it would have been even more effective if ACORN had actually engaged in malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's it!! We need to spend more money on defense!!
Err, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't this be a good time to clean house and put a new batch of
leaders in the place of the booooooosh appointees of the last term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. now I know why my dad was so burnt out...
Edited on Fri Jul-23-10 09:45 PM by w8liftinglady
career AF with NSA...sworn to silence.No wonder he drank like a fish...may he rest in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why isn't this stuff blocked?
With most network security software, like BlueCoat, you can block out pr0n and other naughty sites. If you accidentally click on one, you get the "red screen of death." So, why the frak weren't the Pentagon network security guys blocking this?

Oh yeah, they were *contractors*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. From the article
"Another individual alleged to have been involved was working at the national reconnaissance office in Virginia, which operates the military's spy satellites. He was not charged but sent to a lower level job in a field office in New Mexico."

Hmm, learning lessons from the Catholic church, I see...

Also:

"A worker at a separate establishment also had pornographic images but the ages of those involved could not be determined and so it could not be established they were children."

I was curious if these images were from those "Barely Legal" websites that have young women who pretend to be much younger, or if they were from truly evil sites that clearly use small children. They're both nasty, but its a matter of degree, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Oh, we've re-assigned Father Feely to another parish."
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC