Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"War" in Iraq DID NOT End- It's an OCCUPATION- More Mercenaries to Go In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phillip Walker Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:15 PM
Original message
"War" in Iraq DID NOT End- It's an OCCUPATION- More Mercenaries to Go In
The symbolic end of America's involvement in the war has arrived, but the propaganda rages on.

US to Rely on Contractors in Iraq

The US State Department is to more than double the number of security contractors it employs in Iraq to around 7000, filling a gap left by departing troops, the New York Times reported on Thursday.

The newspaper said the contractors would be deployed to defend five fortified compounds that will be left behind as US combat forces exit Iraq and the US mission switches from a military-led to a civilian-headed operation.

Citing unnamed administration officials, the Times said private security contractors would operate radar to warn of enemy fire, search for roadside bombs, and fly surveillance drones.

...

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/us-to-rely-on-contractors-in-iraq-20100819-12s0k.html

Obama Has 250,000 “Contractors” in Iraq and Afghan Wars, Increases Number of Mercenaries



...

released by the Pentagon, with Barack Obama as commander in chief, there has been a 23% increase in the number of “Private Security Contractors” working for the Department of Defense in Iraq in the second quarter of 2009 and a 29% increase in Afghanistan, which “correlates to the build up of forces” in the country. In Iraq, the Pentagon attributes the increase to better accounting. But, these numbers relate explicitly to DoD security contractors. Companies like Blackwater and its successor Triple Canopy work on State Department contracts and it is unclear if these contractors are included in the over-all statistics. This means, the number of individual “security” contractors could be quite higher, as could the scope of their expansion.

Overall, contractors (armed and unarmed) now make up approximately 50% of the “total force in Centcom AOR .” This means there are a whopping 242,657 contractors working on these two US wars. These statistics come from two reports just released by Gary J. Motsek, the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Program Support): “Contractor Support of U.S. Operations in USCENTCOM AOR, IRAQ, and Afghanistan and “Operational Contract Support, ‘State of the Union.’”

...

http://rebelreports.com/post/116277092/obama-has-250-000-contractors-in-iraq-and-afghan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shh! You're Messing Up the Meme!
Don't let the Truth get in the way of the victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. And since the mercs don't fall under our UMC, all manor of evil could be done in our name
Not a good thing and not a withdrawal. Privatized war is worse. How do we have oversight? How do we maintain any control of what is done in our name?

Thanks for posting. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. do you have any idea of how many mercs we have in germany or korea?!!1
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the cash cow ie tax payer $$$ for war profiteers, rolls on.
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 12:06 PM by SammyWinstonJack
What'd say, want to play?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. quit bashing Obama with your facts.
the war is over, didnt you see msnbc the other day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. +1
a propaganda piece so extreme even Keith and Rachel questioned it heavily. not quite at the level of the "mission accomplished" banner of Bush, but still, propaganda none the less. we WILL be there for a LONG time. we need a REAL progressive in office who will REALLY end this war profiteering shit. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Adios.
Edited on Fri Aug-20-10 11:54 AM by Scurrilous
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Welcome to DU ...
we're desperate for people who see through the duplicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Too bad..

this one has been ts'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-20-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama Has 250,000 “Contractors” in Iraq and Afghan Wars, Increases Number of Mercenaries
Now that's a headline. Good fucking god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC