"Once it is that safe and secure, we can use it."
A) The computer scientists who hacked the D.C. Internet Voting say that will be "decades" at earliest:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8118B) How will you or I ever KNOW that it is? If the citizenry can't verify that votes are cast and recorded accurately, we can't use the system.
C) If I have to *trust* in a computer scientist or election official to *tell* me that it's "safe and secure", that doesn't work either (that is, for example, the same failed system we have right now in most of the nation.)
As to Kelleher, I have no specific reasons to distrust his motives. He seems to be sincere, but astoundingly misguided, absolutely disinterested in science and those who have proven his wishful thinking to be wrong time and again, completely in denial of documented facts, willing to mislead Americans about the dangers and lack of transparency of Internet Voting, and wholly dismissive of the notion that self-governance requires the ability for citizen oversight.
He's been on his obsessive crusade for years and doesn't seem to give a damn about the points mentioned above. Kinda like Diebold used to be come to think of it. But I have no reason to believe Kelleher is a scammer (though fully open to the possibility). At this time, he appears to be just plain wrong. Often obnoxiously so.