|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:39 PM Original message |
Why didn't we pass middle class tax cuts when we had a super majority? |
Refresh | +20 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Incompetence + a huge lack of spine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Baloney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Newest Reality (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. + Megarecs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. are you saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I'm saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:41 AM Response to Reply #44 |
82. Thanks for the reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. Deleted message |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #20 |
85. Which is precisely why Bewsh pretty much got everything he wanted . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
johnlucas (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
94. Somebody understands here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Rectangle (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. "We're keeping our Powder Dry!!!!!!" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
49. Deleted message |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. we still have the same majority until Jan right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. One would never know it based on what is going on in Congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
badtoworse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Scott Brown winning was a huge fly in the ointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. The idea that the Dems allowed Ted Kennedy's seat to go repuke is as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I was thinking about when Kennedy was still alive.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sasha031 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. what would Senator Kennedy say about tax breaks for billionaires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. conservative corner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
52. Deleted message |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because they didn't want to. Don't know why people here assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
53. Deleted message |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. Because like now we didnt have the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Aha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. We never had the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. Are you saying that Dems are to blame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
67. Yeah, we only had 60 votes; the Republicans had a 40 vote majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. We might have come close, but four Democrats did not vote for the middle-class-only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. it says that the party is shiite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #42 |
76. the party is shit cause 4 out of 60 dissagree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
54. Deleted message |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Congress was too busy debating some ridiculous crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
55. Deleted message |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. Bad tactics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
56. Deleted message |
Desertrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. My word of the day...WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Newest Reality (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. The word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Desertrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. No, actually I want to know WHY they are doing what they're doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why didn't we pass what with the supermajority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Why didn't we pass tax cuts and unemployment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Because only one Republican senator could end debate on anything..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I was talking about before Teddy died |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. I have explained...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. One Senator can obstruct but not forever if you have 60 votes for cloture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #65 |
75. So then what that should tell you is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
57. Deleted message |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
15. Neolibs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:42 PM Original message |
Deleted message |
Ginto (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. We were concentrating on making sure everyone had to pay their tithe to the health insurance co's.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
21. Because we had to let the repubs stall HCR reform first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Phlem (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. Here's a guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
60. Deleted message |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
26. Because we can't walk and chew gum at the same time. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
61. Deleted message |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. Too many Dems thought it could derail their re-election campaigns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
63. Deleted message |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
28. Too busy finding money to fund the Permanent War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
29. 99-1 majority and we still wouldn't get something worthwhile passed, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
30. No leadership from the top. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
northoftheborder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. We never had an actual WORKING super majority...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
32. Outmaneuvered, as usual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
33. Here's my guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. thanks for the reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. Because we have always had (as part of our majority) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bluestate10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
45. Priorities were wrong. Time wasted on Cap and Trade and Health Care Reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
46. We did, called the stimulus package. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #46 |
72. Time to give up now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
90. Thanks for noticing, anyway. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:45 AM Response to Reply #46 |
83. the stimulus extended middle class tax cuts and unemployment bennies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Lets take a look at that link.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
84. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. Different tax cut... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #89 |
91. thanks for the clarification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
47. The Same Reason Many Other Items Passed In The House Failed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
48. Ben Nelson has voted against every unpaid for unemployment extension and every tax cut extension |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
50. We can't walk and chew gum at the same time after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:42 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. excellent post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 06:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
86. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
59. What supermajority? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
62. Oh my God. DU is not nearly as informed as I once believed it to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #62 |
68. enlighten me please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #68 |
78. Please see response number 46. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:38 AM Response to Reply #62 |
70. Let's hear it then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #70 |
79. Please see response number 46. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
66. Because Mitch McConnell can hold his breath for a real long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RegieRocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
69. Because they are unable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
71. we didnt have 60 then, we dont have 60 now and wont have 60 tomorrow, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
73. Occam's razor: The President wouldn't have been able to leverage tax cuts for the rich that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
74. Because we didn't want to. Not anymore than we want to stop the wars. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
77. Benator voted for the tax cuts in 2003 so we probably only had 59 at the most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
80. The pesky loud teevee commercial volume got fixed. And you want more? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-08-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
81. Ypu'll hear lots of excuses, but the simple fact is, we have no strong leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-09-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
88. Stimulus, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Why do you think the law would have been better before August? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
johnlucas (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-10-10 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
92. The Democrats are not interested in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC