Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Randi Rhodes now shilling for the White House?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:22 PM
Original message
Why is Randi Rhodes now shilling for the White House?
Randi Rhodes is fervently defending the Obama Tax Cut Deal and praising Obama's smartness, and sounding like she's using White House talking points. She's emphasizing the payroll tax cut for one (which is really a Social Security funding cut) despite the danger of it leading to the permenant defunding of Social Security, thus possibly leading to the Republicans having the excuse to privatize Social Security. I used to frequently hear Randi Rhodes, but Randi Rhodes has been hard for me to listen to in recent days...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Noticed Stephanie Miller doing the same this morning...
I guess we shunned-yet-troublesome progressives are supposed to fall in line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. sounds like the opposite expectation to me
. . . the op wants these folks to just 'fall in line' behind what they believe. What's the basis for claiming these folks aren't sincere in their beliefs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. and per your post, what's the basis for claiming the progressives aren't sincere in theirs?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. well, I accept the progressive argument on the issues as sincere
. . . I'm obviously a dissenter on tactics and strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. fair enough...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DFab420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. OMG!!111
you two just a had a civil discourse about two points of view!!

How could you!!!!

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. you didn't see that flying pig outside your window just now...?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. yeah, it was a pep rally this morning wasn't it?
Hal Sparks had his talking points down perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Her and her shrill voiced buddy, Hal. I had to turn her off.
Jeez the two of them went on and on til I couldn't stand it. Like a broken record.
Ugh!

I heard Bill Press, or one of his guests, say that the WH was in full tilt spin control since the weekend. They were lining up all their stooges in academia and the media to spew their loser line.

I heard that even Limbaugh is admiring Obama now that he beat up his own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. maybe she..... has a different opinion than you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. You should've heard callers to her yesterday...
And even then, now it sounds like Thom Hartmann and Mike Malloy make more sense than her. She's for a while become so fervently defending of Obama that it questions to me if she's become a shill of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. cause Randi doesnt fall for BS talking points
and thinks for herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. shilling to you is disagreeing with you
She doesn't have a right to her opinion and to state that opinion on her own show? I'll bet that if she was agreeing with you that you'd take a different tack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. She has a different opinion than you, and so do I
What is with the arrogance around here? Why do you think everyone must agree with you on everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ya mean she.... uh..... CAVED??
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is that not allowed?
Is there some law that all pundits have to disagree with the WH at all times? I can see it may seem that way at times, but I think we still have a First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The way that Randi Rhodes defends Obama questions to me her motives... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I guess as she says to her listeners... "Don't believe a thing I say"
I guess my mistake is in trusting her in being "impartial". Hey, it takes quite a bit to build trust in a listener, maybe I should find something else to hear and also cancel my subscription to her podcast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. why would should her 'motives' be questioned
. . . any more than those of opponents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe she agrees with the White House.
Not everyone has the same ideas, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because she isn't letting her ideology turn into religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. That's the worst news of the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. UnRec'd
Unrec for the use of 'Shilling' when describing people that have a different viewpoint.

That clarion call was all the rage during the election cycle and has remained. If you disagree with my stance on prescription drugs - you are a shill for big pharma. If you disagree with my stance on the oil spill - you are a shill for BP.

Some people have different opinions. Feel free to say that you disagree or that they are wrong, but to demean them by accusing them of being in the paid service for something else is just beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. She's old and lost her mind? Isn't that what the moderates say about
People just before they throw them under the bus.

Well - then -- she's old and lost her mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. She's entitled to her opinion and her analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Does she make over 250K???? That would be a motivator...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Some people do believe this is a good deal. As for Randi
She will go along with whatever Obama wants. She is stuck in "COP" mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flakban Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. One indicator is that Randi has always been prone toward...
perpetual namedropping of the celebrities / powerful people whom she knows or whom she has simply met once or twice. She's a shameless braggart in this regard. When talking about a famous person she's met in real life, she tends to go into a euphoric state as she rambles on about what a great friendship she has with said individual. She does this often and to a sickening degree. Her attitude often comes across as: "There's no question that I'm superior to most of you because I belong to an elite social class that includes celebrities and high power politicians who YOU can never hope to interact with, much less have personal friendships with like I do." I find this disgustingly arrogant on Randi's part. She can be so rude to her callers. But when a famous or powerful person is speaking with her, it's instant respect and awe.

You might ask what the above has to do with Randi's seemingly ignorant support of Obama's recent sell out to the Republicans. Well, Randi has always been infatuated with Barack Obama and his celebrity persona. Once he became our president she seemed to commit to him unconditionally with a "he's so god-like and can do no wrong" embracement. When she commits in this way to some high-profile person, even an 'act of Congress' (proverbial pun intended) can't easily dissuade her blind defense of that person's unreasonable and / or harmful behaviors.

Randi used to demonstrate this type of blind, raving support for Bill Clinton. She started doing it when she first became nationally syndicated on Air America. She went on and on with it for quite a long time. She used to refer to him as "my president" during her sappy descriptions of how great he is / was.

The short answer: Randi is starstruck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
30. Shilling? Because she agrees that it's the ONLY bill that is going to stop the repukes
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 11:50 AM by bushisanidiot
from a huge christmas present, which is a campaign theme for 2012 "OBAMA and the democrats raised your taxes!". The tea baggers are frothing at the mouth, HOPING that nothing is signed this year so that they will still be "relevant" in they eyes of the media for the next campaign season.

If the president gets the dems to sign this bill, not only does he save the lower and middle class from suffering from a tax increase, but he will also be taking the bat out of the repukes hands for the 2012 election. It's a brilliant move and we are shooting ourselves in the foot by pretending that the republicans will come around to our way of thinking and will voluntarily sign a bill that only helps those who need help. THEY WON'T!!! If that's the kind of bill that they signed, then they wouldn't be republicans. They'd be democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
31. When one stands to gain as much as they will under this deal
you can expect almost ANY person that makes that much money to support the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. She lives in DC now and has been assimilated by the Village. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC