|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:02 PM Original message |
Dean: President Obama won't face primary foe |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dean's always said this - wish he didn't feel this way, but he's been consistent. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. yep, he's been consistent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't agree with him on this, which shouldn't surprise anyone. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Howard can see the Forest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Another DINO corporatist sellout tool of the moneyed interests... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. There was never a chance in Hell that Howard Dean would challenge Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Gravel-Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. C'est pour rire! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. ou, peut-être à pleurer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. C'est vrai. Quel dommage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Those are the clubhouse leaders, and they're not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. uh oh, Howard better have on his asbestos pantsuit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. That's what they said about LBJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. if you work at it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Obama is certainly working at it. Just like LBJ did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. it's not having nearly the effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. You may be underestimating the effect of the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I'm looking out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LiberalArkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Just because he is correct in the reasoning does not we are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
10. That's the common misconception. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I think it's more speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. He's hugely unpopular among two historically.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. party bosses are one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. If people perceive the candidate as offering nothing, he'll lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I'd say he's offering more than "nothing"; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. There won't be a primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. he's right ck history or even ask bernie sanders since he is wealth of knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
16. Come up with a primary candidate or Dems will loose 2012. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. Really? If you loose 2012, it'll run away, for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NCarolinawoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. Except, I keep thinking a Republican will be primaried as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. I think the President would garner the most support in that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MadamAB (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
20. So then Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
21. Didn't say Obama was going to run, either - did he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. If There's Gonna Be A Challenge, Time's A Wastin'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. If the major donors won't back Obama, Obama might just have to decline running for a 2nd term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. as if that's even a remote possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #29 |
43. His biggest donor was Goldman Sachs, not the little people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. so liberals support Romney becoming president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Not going to happen. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Modern School (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Who'd Want to Oppose Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
37. yes, nor should he face a political foe. nothing in this country has changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. Wanna bet ? There WILL BE a primary challenge to Mr. Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. none of those have anywhere near what it takes to run a national campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-12-10 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
40. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC