Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uribe successor Santos vows to govern without "rearview mirror"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:29 PM
Original message
Uribe successor Santos vows to govern without "rearview mirror"
Uribe successor Santos vows to govern without "rearview mirror"
Aug 7, 2010, 0:33 GMT

Bogota
- Colombia's President-elect Juan Manuel Santos said Friday that his government will solve the conflict-weary country's 'serious problems.'

Santos, who takes office Saturday, was elected as the endorsed successor to fellow conservative Alvaro Uribe, who was constitutionally barred from seeking another term.

'The country is doing well on many fronts, but it also has serious problems that we are, of course, going to solve,' Santos said. 'The government will not be a rearview mirror. The government will solve problems and look to the future.'

A journalist and economist by training, Santos is a member of one of Colombia's wealthiest and most powerful families. He has vowed to maintain Uribe's hard line against Marxist rebels and to continue his predecessor's business-friendly economic policies.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com.nyud.net:8090/global/img/copyright_notice.gif

More:
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/americas/news/article_1576043.php/Uribe-successor-Santos-vows-to-govern-without-rearview-mirror
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. So that little bastard is out today and a new little bastard is in.
Colombia has no chance of freeing itself from these killers while we arm them to the teeth and praise them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually they had a chance in the election.
Of course, with all major candidates including Mockus promising to continue Uribe's security policies, I guess there is no way that you could have been satisfied with the wishes of the Colombian people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "all major candidates"
In other words, was it kindof like the US where there is a choice between Republican and Republican-Lite?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, not at all..
There were lots of candidates, and the popular ones, including Mockus, all promised to continue Uribe's security policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You are desperately out of place trying to tell DU'ers people are free to vote in Colombia.
Edited on Sat Aug-07-10 06:25 PM by Judi Lynn
We know better, have been hearing of paras in/near/around the voting centers for YEARS. Here's one very clear example:
"Mark Him on the Ballot - The One Wearing Glasses"
By Constanza Vieira

BOGOTA, May 8 , 2008 (IPS) - "With Uribe, we thought: this is the guy who is going to change the country," the 41-year-old fisherwoman told IPS.

That is why her fishing and farming village of 800 people in the central Colombian region of Magdalena Medio decided overwhelmingly to vote for current President Álvaro Uribe in the 2002 presidential elections, when he first ran.

The woman agreed to talk to IPS on the condition that she be asked neither her name (we will call her "L.") nor the name of her village.

The main city in the fertile region of Magdalena Medio is Barrancabermeja, an oil port on the Magdalena River, which runs across Colombia from south to north before emptying into the Caribbean Sea.

What convinced the villagers to vote for Uribe? "Because the region where we live is poor, very poor, it’s so difficult to find work, and when I heard him say ‘I am going to work for the poor, I am going to help them,’ I thought ‘this is a good president’."

When the rightwing president’s first four-year term came to an end in 2006, most of the villagers decided again to vote for him, reasoning that he just needed more time to reduce poverty.

The odd thing was that in both the 2002 and 2006 elections, despite the fact that the villagers had already decided to vote for Uribe, the far-right paramilitaries, who had committed a number of murders since 1998, when they appeared in the region that was previously dominated by the leftwing guerrillas, pressured the local residents to vote for Uribe anyway.

The paramilitaries did not kill people to pressure the rest to vote for Uribe, as they did in other communities, but merely used "threats," said L.

"If you don't vote for Uribe, you know what the consequences will be," the villagers were told ominously.

And on election day, they breathed down voters’ necks: "This is the candidate you’re going to vote for. You’re going to put your mark by this one. The one wearing glasses," they would say, pointing to Uribe’s photo on the ballot, L. recalled.

"One (of the paramilitaries) was on the precinct board, another one was standing next to the table, and another was a little way off, all of them watching to see if you voted for Uribe," she added, referring to the less than subtle way that the death squads commanded by drug traffickers and allies of the army ensured that L.’s village voted en masse for the current president in both elections.

"We form part of a municipality where there is corruption, from the mayor to town councillors, the police, the army and the justice officials - in a word, everyone. They are just one single corrupt mass. So what are you supposed to do?" said L., who added that the paramilitaries "control everything."
More:
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42290

~~~~~

Vote-Buying and Front Men
By Javier Darío Restrepo*

BOGOTÁ, Mar 16, 2010 (IPS) - During Sunday's legislative elections in Colombia - in which rightwing President Álvaro Uribe's allies were the big winners - polling stations in one-third of the country's municipalities were at risk of violence, corruption or fraud, according to the ombudsman's office and election observers, who reported vote-buying and pressure on voters.

Some of the public were also alarmed at the appearance of the National Integration Party (PIN), a reincarnation of the National Democratic Alliance (ADN) party, which was banned by the electoral court due to irregularities.

The organisers of the controversial ADN are in prison or under investigation for their ties to the far-right paramilitary militias, which are accused of heavy involvement in the drug trade as well as appalling human rights abuses in this South American country that has been in the grip of an armed conflict since 1964.

The legislative polls drew attention worldwide not only because they were seen as an indication of voter intention for the May elections - in which Uribe would have won a third term hands down, according to opinion polls, if the courts had not thwarted attempts last month to modify the constitution to allow him to stand again - but also because of scandals that have surrounded Congress for years.

As an editorial in the El Espectador newspaper put it, "Over the last eight years, Congress has been caught up in the worst crisis in its history."

~snip~
According to government spokespersons, the elections were the smoothest and calmest in 30 years.

But foreign observers reported that vote-buying and fraud was as bad as, or worse than, in the last elections. They also denounced undue pressure on voters, such as the threat of blocking poor voters' access to health care if they did not cast their ballots for a given candidate.

When the election results began to trickle in, there were celebrations in a number of prison cells in Colombia. Álvaro García, a former senator sentenced last month to 40 years in prison for ordering a 2000 massacre of 15 peasants in the northern town of Macayepo, made sure he will continue to be active in politics in his region through his sister Teresita García, who was elected to Congress Sunday.

Other newly elected legislators are the wife of a former governor who was sentenced to seven years in prison; the son of an imprisoned lottery businesswoman charged with murder and money laundering; the political partner of a congressman; and the cousin of a former senator who is on trial.

In short, the two parties with the largest number of legislators in prison or facing prosecution were the big winners Sunday.

More:
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=50686
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. uh huh..
"having heard of"

nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbscar Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I would invite you to take a look at the elections in detail instead of simplifying things
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 09:10 PM by gbscar
Anyone who doesn't just read everything in the articles you've posted but who also reads up on many more detailed electoral reports made by observation missions from the MOE, the OAS or even NGO sources would reach the conclusion that yes, there are many problems involved in the elections but the situation still isn't as simplistic as you're making it sound (as if the bulk of the votes or voters are automatically pressured by paramilitaries so that all elections mean nothing all across the board).

Both rounds of the 2010 presidential elections, for instance, were significantly cleaner than the March 14th congressional elections and other previous voting events, not less, because among other differences there were more observers present.

Those interested might want to read up on this website and its reports, which aren't issued by a government agency but by a collection of NGOs, unions, universities and other kinds of associations, including both national and international observers.

Links to MOE:

http://www.moe.org.co/webmoe/

http://www.moe.org.co/webmoe/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=110&Itemid=107

List of organizations in MOE:

http://www.moe.org.co/webmoe/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=159:plataforma-regionales&catid=50:iquienes-somos-

What's more, the same OAS electoral observers who have generally certified the elections in Venezuela as free and fair find that the elections in Colombia are still considerably freer than the quasi-dictatorship you're painting with broad brushes by selectively quoting and selectively interpreting just a fragment of the information available in your favor. In other words, the majority of the voting population doesn't go through paramilitary pressures. That isn't to say they haven't been an influence in the elections, but not in the absolutely decisive way you're implying, to the point of making elections unnecessary (doesn't explain why opposition or independent candidates have also done well either, particularly at the regional and local level, even when Uribe or other establishment figures have made their preferences clear).

Link to the OAS:

http://www.oas.org/OASpage/press_releases/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-267/10

What's more, it's not just a matter of "paras" when the single biggest source for vote-buying/-selling and fraud is traditional clientelism, which doesn't go along ideological lines but has more to do with corruption and historical Latin American politicking traditions, or when even the guerrillas themselves have intimidated or killed candidates they don't like or otherwise obstructed the entire voting process in ways that you apparently aren't aware of.

But I suppose complexity is a bad thing when we must look at everything in terms of absolutes. My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC