Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fareed Zakaria: A Victory for Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:34 PM
Original message
Fareed Zakaria: A Victory for Obama
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 05:00 PM by babylonsister
A Victory for Obama

From an unlikely quarter—Pakistan.
By Fareed Zakaria | NEWSWEEK
Published Mar 12, 2010


President Obama gets much credit for changing America's image in the world—he was probably awarded the Nobel Prize for doing so. But if you asked even devoted fans to cite a specific foreign-policy achievement, they would probably hesitate. "It's too soon for that," they would say. But in fact, there is a place where Barack Obama's foreign policy is working, and one that is crucial to U.S. national security—Pakistan.

There has been a spate of good news coming out of that complicated country, which has long promised to take action against Islamic militants but rarely done so. (The reason: Pakistan has used many of these same militants to destabilize its traditional foe, India, and to gain influence in Afghanistan.) Over the past few months, the Pakistani military has engaged in serious and successful operations in the militant havens of Swat, Malakand, South Waziristan, and Bajaur. Some of these areas are badlands where no Pakistani government has been able to establish its writ, so the achievement is all the more important. The Pakistanis have also ramped up their intelligence sharing with the U.S. This latter process led to the arrest a month ago of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the deputy leader of the Afghan Taliban, among other Taliban figures.

Some caveats: most of the Taliban who have been captured are small fish, and the Pakistani military has a history of "catching and releasing" terrorists so that they can impress Americans but still maintain their ties with the militants. But there does seem to be a shift in Pakistani behavior. Why it's taken place and how it might continue is a case study in the nature and limits of foreign-policy successes.

First, the Obama administration de-fined the problem correctly. Senior ad-ministration officials stopped referring to America's efforts in Afghanistan and instead spoke constantly of "AfPak," to emphasize the notion that success in Afghanistan depended on actions taken in Pakistan. This dismayed the Pakistanis but they got the message. They were on notice to show they were part of the solution, not the problem.

Second, the administration used both sticks and carrots. For his first state dinner, Obama pointedly invited Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh—clearly not Pakistan's first choice. Obama made clear that America would continue to pursue the special relationship forged with India under the Bush administration, including a far-reaching deal on nuclear cooperation. But at the same time, the White House insisted it wanted a deep, long-term, and positive relationship with Pakistan. Sens. John Kerry and Dick Lugar put together the largest nonmilitary package of U.S. assistance for the country ever. Aid to the Pakistani military is also growing rapidly.

Third, it put in time and effort. The administration has adopted what Central Command's Gen. David Petraeus calls a "whole of government" approach to Pakistan. All elements of U.S. power and diplomacy have been deployed. Pakistan has received more than 25 visits by senior administration officials in the past year, all pushing the Pakistani military to deliver on commitments to fight the militants.

more...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/234926
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if the ISI is still skimming their 50%.
Most likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Obama is quite gracious in pointedly not bringing up
...what was general knowledge in 1996, isn't he?

Diplomacy, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The 50% that funded the Taliban
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 05:15 PM by formercia
Obama would not want to hear my solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not likely - when Kerry/Lugar/Berman was passed
unusually strict controls were put in to prevent that from happening as it did in the past. This led to great Pakistani anger - in spite of what they were getting. Kerry negotiated some language that made the government slightly less unhappy, but the terms remained the same. This led to a Kerry visit to Pakistan, where he was able to calm some - but definitely not all the anger that was there. Even though the aid package that had his name on it was unprecedented, they were very angry at the conditions. Hillary Clinton went to Pakistan a month or so later, in a visit designed to emphasize the growing commitment of the US, where she announced 10 important projects that had been approved using money from Kerry/Lugar/Berman. Even coming bearing gifts, she was met with anger at a townhall she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. The intelligent approach
for dealing with those who would blow themselves and their targets up to make a point about "infidels".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kickass president. Poor haters (of both sides).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has Biden recovered from being spat upon when he was in Israel
Even Tom Friedman was appalled!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. *I* would have said..... "Pakistan"...
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 08:46 PM by Clio the Leo
.... but I'm a "superfan." I guess.

I think it will be interesting in years to come when historians look back on this and examine how the President's personal experience in Pakistan played a role in this. Obviously the admin doesn't want to play this up, but you cant help but think that his time spent in Pakistan and his friendship with Pakistanis didn't have some positive influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another item I like about the president...
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 08:53 PM by golfguru
is his support to take DNA samples of all individuals arrested.
This will go a long way in absolving innocent people wrongly accused
of a crime.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/obama-supports-dna-sampling-upon-arrest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. You've got to be fucking kidding me.
This tripe doesn't deserve pixels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Aw, come on, share your real feelings with the group....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Something to consider: Fareed's critical thinking skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. The way one feels about others is the way they are likely to feel right
back. Respect has pathos if it is only one way but it has global voltage when it is mutual.

Barack Obama got that a long time ago in his life and has employed it to lift a lot of boats.

There's a whole lotta mutual respect goin' on that didn't go on under Dubya, and I like it.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC