Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Aides See ‘Extended Period’ of Unemployment (too stupid to do anything about it)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:35 PM
Original message
Obama Aides See ‘Extended Period’ of Unemployment (too stupid to do anything about it)
So then 1) give the stiff-arm to Wall St. and 2) change America's ruinous "free" trade policies, idiots!



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aXaMufrB.FA0

Obama Aides See ‘Extended Period’ of Unemployment

March 16 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. employers won’t hire enough workers this year to lower the jobless rate much below the level of 9.7 percent reached in February, three Obama administration economic officials said today.

The proportion of Americans who can’t find work is likely to “remain elevated for an extended period,” Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, White House budget director Peter Orszag and Christina Romer, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, said in a joint statement. The officials said unemployment may even rise “slightly” over the next few months as discouraged workers start job-hunting again.

“We do not expect further declines in unemployment this year,” the officials said in testimony prepared for the House Appropriations Committee. They predicted the economy would add about 100,000 jobs a month on average -- not enough to bring the jobless rate down substantially.

Today’s projections are in line with the 10 percent average unemployment forecast for this year in last month’s budget plan. Christopher Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York, said the administration’s language risks damping expectations for a recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. lol
this is all getting so predictible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wall St. doesn't know how to create jobs for Main St. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. lol A negative post? Why bother? There's got to be some place
on this great big blogosphere that would make you happy. And I 'so' want you to be happy! :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. he must be real fun at parties.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. I'm told bush* was "real fun at parties". Someone you could have a beer with.
Aren't you glad nothing's changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
35. In my county, Unemployment is higher than that 10%
and the people who are losing housing and going hungry are happy each and every time anyone draws attention to their situation.
The suffering of others is not about making you happy, or some poster happy. A man cried on my porch yesterday because I gave him $5 to pull some weeds. He cried. Is there an emoticon for a weeping adult man stuck in poverty? If there was, I'd use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. OP criticizes the administration so you personally attack the poster.
It happens over and over like this. It proves what a weak and cynical argument you have.

It also proves who the REAL haters are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or perhaps the economy is more complicated than that.
Barack Obama is anything but stupid. I doubt his aides are either.

I respectfully request that you do not call our President stupid. I have a hard time believing that enacting reforms would immediately end unemployment. Perhaps, even with the most liberal agenda, there would still be an extended period of unemployment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, then you've never heard of Franklin D. Roosevelt
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 07:47 PM by brentspeak
The unemployment/underemployment epidemic is completely man-made, created by economic policies which allow Wall St. to run wild with all kinds of financial games, as well as finance the offshoring of America's jobs. Obama has shown is too craven to even remotely change the status quo; in fact, he's even trying to shore the status quo up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. WORLD WAR 2!!!
Yes.

Let us have a World War.


Maybe if we conscript, and have all males go to Afghanistan and Iraq, then we can start having good employment numbers.

Can you think beyond your ideological blinders?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Uh, did you do well in American History class?
It was called "the New Deal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Straight A's in history and a minor in politics from NYU
I know all about the New Deal.

But it was WW2 that killed the Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Heres a wikipedia link.
Sorry that it is wikipedia, but I'm not going digging with work in the morning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression#World_War_II_and_recovery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Oh, and for good measure.
http://useconomy.about.com/od/grossdomesticproduct/p/1929_Depression.htm


Key point. The New Deal caused "extended unemployment". And it took a world war to end it.


FDR has extended unemployment Brentspeak, and it took World War 2 to end it.

We have extended unemployment too, and its getting better - the same way it did during the New Deal (slower because government did not open up many huge programs because our recession was not a depression).

If you want Obama to have a sudden end to unemployment... well, you better hope for a massive, massive expansion in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Otherwise, sit tight and realize they are just as smart or smarter than us and are trying to fix our problems.


I did very well in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Right-wing horse-shit:
The New Deal caused "extended unemployment".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Context.
The original poster was complaining about Obama causing or not responding to unemployment.

Read my posts. The New Deal helped, but Obama is doing something similar.

Context, sir. Context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. It's also unfair to compare the unemployment rate eight-plus years into the FDR administration...
To the unemployment rate one year into the Obama administration.

Yet that's what this poster seems to be doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Context lacking. Or, your statements are entirely at odds.
Care to clarify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Wow...you just embarrassed yourself.
Do you know what the unemployment rate was a year into FDR's first term?

22%

Do you know what the unemployment rate was in 1932, the year Roosevelt was elected?

24%

Unemployment did decrease prior to WWII (it was 16.9 in 1936), however, it didn't get down to pre-depression levels (lower single digits) until 1942...or a year after the U.S. entered the war (unemployment was 4.7 then).





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I really want to see this guy did himself out of that.
Thank you Mr. Drunken Irishman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. Who embarrassed who???
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 07:59 AM by brentspeak
My post pointed out that FDR reduced employment, which your own post verified. Obama is doing nothing to reduce unemployment -- actually doing everything he can to ensure the high unemployment will continue. All Obama is willing to do is rely on today's new government-rigged unemployment statistics to make things look rosier than they are. FDR didn't have the luxury (or the willingness) to settle for statistics-as-lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. If you stop now, maybe I won't laugh at you.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 12:41 PM by Drunken Irishman
FDR lowered unemployment by a percentage point in the span you're talking about. One point! haha

Granted, the unemployment rate rose in Obama's first year - but it hasn't risen in the last few months and shows signs of declining.

So there you go. Get back to me three years from now. If unemployment is still at 9.7%, I'll be inclined to say you're right.

But right now? Obama isn't much different than FDR. And I'm sure if you were around back then and so was DU, you would've deemed (along with the Republicans, who you guys constantly side with) the New Deal a failure because it only managed to knock off a percentage point of depression-era unemployment - which surely was worse than what we see today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Thank you, mr.715. Also, I remember President Obama specfically...
stating that unemployment will continue to be a problem until possibly 2011. People continually REFUSE to LISTEN to what the man says. It's very aggravating to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. He should wave his magic wand and *poof* everyone is employed!
That's what you would do, right? After all, he's been President for a year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Geitner and Burnanke take another puff from their Cigars....is anyone surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. If you don't know how to spell their names
why should we think you've studied them long enough to have an opinion on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. plenty of job security for the military and corporate welfare contractors tho eh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah! And Obama burned my toast!
And forgot to take out the trash this morning! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. What's the matter? Obama's butt-kissing of Wall St. doesn't make you ashamed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. "...doesn't make you ashamed?"
Ah... Projection revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Captain Smith sees Extended Period of taking on water.


Doesn't know what the fuck to do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. I bet they are lowering expectations on purpose...
The temporary census jobs alone should help a fair amount.

Unemployment will improve this year. I bet 8.8% by November. Still bad, but not 9.7% bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. That's a fair guess. The job market will get better, it's just going to be
more gradual then the past. Our economy just came through a massive shit storm and all things considered is holding together pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. They did the same thing last month.
There was a flurry of stories prior to the February employment report that suggested unemployment would rise to above 10%.

The report then came out and unemployment, while not great, didn't rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama aides = Obama? Are you able to tell the difference? Do you think M$M is a credible source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. no
but knowing lots of people out of work for a long time is a credible source
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. My 94 yr old cousin think that POTUS should do like FDR create a WPA...
that would snap the Pukes necks, as it did back then. Put people to work, doing things for a check rather than a hand out. There is lots to fix in properties, parks, etc that (we) (us) own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
31. The US economy and employment rate is not like the corner car wash
Cutting the Managers salary to hire more employees while cutting prices to increase customers works for Joe the Car Wash owner. Turning around an economic collapse in one year has been accomplished exactly ZERO times.

Sure the Gov't could print trillions of dollars and put millions to work and solve the solution short term but the long term effects would be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well, when you call Obama "Stupid" I know I'm going to learn something by reading
:sarcasm:

so i didn't bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC