Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spokesman tries to clarify another dumb Boehner statement: "moratorium on new federal regulations"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 03:02 PM
Original message
Spokesman tries to clarify another dumb Boehner statement: "moratorium on new federal regulations"

Boehner: No more new Federal regulations!

UPDATE, 2:50 p.m.: DCCC chair Chris Van Hollen responds:

"Republican Leader Boehner's comments are Exhibit A of how Washington Republicans want to adopt the same policies that got us into this mess to begin with. You would think that - after the shenanigans on Wall Street, the West Virginia mine disaster, and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill -- Republicans would put the interests of workers, tax payers, and consumers over the needs of big, corporate special interests and their Washington lobbyists. Sadly, that is not the case,"


<...>

UPDATE, 1:11 p.m.: Boehner spokesman Michael Steel gets in touch to clarify that this moratorium would not apply to new regs for the oil industry.

"Boehner said at the same press event that we need to find out what happened in the Gulf and how we can make sure it never, ever happens again," Steel said. "So it is clear that would fall under the `emergency' regulations exception he described."

Asked how this would work, Steel said the idea had first surfaced today during the much-publicized meeting with trade groups, which was streamed online. He said it was too early to go into detail on how such a moratorium would function.

:rofl:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey the Republicans have to earn all that money they are going to get
under the Republicans Supreme Court written Citizens United law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2.  A three-tini lunch?
Too early to go into detail? Oi. Open mouth, insert foot, again. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC