Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GA-GOV POLL shows tight race: Deal 45, Barnes 41.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:11 AM
Original message
GA-GOV POLL shows tight race: Deal 45, Barnes 41.
Poll shows Deal 4 points ahead of Barnes
Governor’s race remains tight; fight likely to get ugly

By Melissa Weinman

Republican Nathan Deal is holding onto a slight lead in the gubernatorial race, according to a poll released today by the Georgia Newspaper Partnership.

The poll, conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, surveyed 625 Georgians likely to vote in November's gubernatorial election. The poll was taken Monday through Wednesday; news broke Wednesday that Deal owes $2.3 million on a business loan taken out for his daughter's failed Habersham County business.

The results show that Deal has the advantage with the support of 45 percent of those polled. Democrat Roy Barnes is slightly behind with 41 percent. Libertarian John Monds claimed 5 percent, and 9 percent of those polled are still undecided.

The numbers shed light on what is sure to be a tight race between Deal and Barnes - the results fall within the poll's 4 percentage point margin of error.

"If it's within the margin of error, that's significant," said Ross Alexander, a political science professor at North Georgia College & State University in Dahlonega. "I think it will still be an extremely close race given the political climate of the state."

Alexander said he believes revelations about Deal's personal finances could have narrowed Deal's projected lead over Barnes and likely will have implications for the rest of the race.

<SNIP>

http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/section/154/article/38028/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great news. Barnes is within striking distance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's see
A crooked politician who can't even collect enough graft to save his ass from bankruptcy vs. someone who colored people vote for. It's enough to dull the point on any good ol' redneck's hood!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. AJC has them in a dead heat
42% to 42%: http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2010/09/17/insideradvantage-and-channel-2-poll-nathan-deal-roy-barnes-in-dead-heat/

We get the campaign commercials, as well as Georgia news on the other side of the Savannah River. I'm surprised that Deal is tied/ahead. He's your typical corrupt rethug, and from the sound of it, he should be in prison, and not running for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The AJC had Barnes up by 11% over Perdue in 02,
Edited on Sun Sep-19-10 02:40 PM by Stevepol
and Barnes lost by 5% pts, a statistical impossiblity. In a state where democratic elections are not feasible (all votes counted in total secrecy, voting machines able to be safely rigged by some cabal among the Repubs, no possibility of audit or recount), there's really no way to even guess what the result will be. If the Repubs in question don't get around to rigging the machines, Barnes might win. I personally think he won in 02, but of course, neither I nor anygody else can say for certain, any more than Perdue can say for certain that he won. It's purely faith-based elections in GA I'm afraid, as it is in most places in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. This could be a Dem pick up as Deal's business interests are under scrutiny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've cautioned about this for 8 years, on DU and elsewhere
Alaska and Georgia are the two worst polled states in the country. Inevitably the more conservative candidate is understated by many points. For whatever reason, the polling models are way off.

Guys like Nate Silver rely on polls for projections. That's fine as long as the polls are accurate, which normally is the case. In Alaska and Georgia you can't take them at face value. I couldn't stop laughing in 2008 when Nate's site, and Pollster.com, and here, and everywhere were scrambling for explanation when the Begich/Stevens senate race in Alaska and the Obama/McCain margin in Georgia didn't resemble the late polling. There were even desperate attempts to find a couple hundred thousand missing votes in Georgia. Of all the results, those two were doubted. What a shock.

The problem, as always, was with the numbers before the vote, not the vote count itself. In this case I'm afraid Barnes is in considerably worse shape than these margins indicate, or any polls will suggest. In Alaska the Murkowski situation provides an opportunity but I'm certain the same dynamic will hold up, our candidate overstated.

Ignore, per usual. I'm sure I'll be shaking my head again in 2012 when Obama is tight in a Georgia poll. It makes for excellent betting opportunities, if nothing else, an undeserved bargain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC