Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: Recover Our Spending Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 02:30 PM
Original message
Robert Reich: Recover Our Spending Power
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 02:42 PM by ProSense

Recover Our Spending Power

By ROBERT B. REICH

<...>

Mr. Obama should point out that the United States economy is now more than twice the size it was in 1980, but the real median wage has barely budged; that in the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of Americans got about 9 percent of total income, while by the start of the Great Recession the richest received more than 23 percent; that wealth is now even more concentrated. And the economy is bogged down because most Americans, unable to borrow as before, no longer have the purchasing power to get it moving again.

The president should make it clear that corporations aren’t to blame; they’re meant to make profits. Nor is it the fault of the rich who have played by the rules. But he should stress that a future with no jobs or lousy jobs for most Americans is not sustainable — not even for American corporations, whose long-term profitability depends on broad-based domestic demand.

The solution is to give average Americans a better economic deal. For starters, he should propose to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (essentially, a wage subsidy) all the way up through the middle class. And he should suggest making the tax system more progressive: The rate on the $50,000 to $90,000 income bracket should be cut to 10 percent; on the $90,000 to $150,000 bracket, to 20 percent; on the $150,000 to $250,000 bracket, to 30 percent. Make up the revenue by increasing taxes on the $250,000 to $500,000 bracket, to 40 percent; from $500,000 to $5 million, to 50 percent; and anything over $5 million, to 60 percent. Tax capital gains the same as ordinary income.

In addition, he should call for strengthening unions by increasing penalties on employers who illegally deter them. And he should make college affordable by allowing federal loans to be repaid as 10 percent of earnings for the first 10 years of full-time employment.

more

Seventy-five percent of Americans make less than $50,000. About 30 percent make less than $14,000 per year.

Raising the minimum wage would help 30 percent of Americans, or 50 million people. The tax code also needs to be fixed.






Edited number to reflect percentage of workforce.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes!
Reich is absolutely on target here.

Unfortunately, I think that many of the rich in this country would rather be a rapidly expanding frog in a shrinking puddle than a healthily growing frog in an expending puddle. The former course has a higher intrinsic narcissistic appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This part might not be well received.
...Make up the revenue by increasing taxes on the $250,000 to $500,000 bracket, to 40 percent; from $500,000 to $5 million, to 50 percent...


Increasing taxes on people making $250,000 and lumping $500,000 and $5 million into the same category might be a tough sell.

The brackets could be adjusted:

$250,000 to $500,000 (no change)
$500,000 to $1 million (increse to 40 percent)
$1 million to $5 million (increase to 50 percent)
$5 million plus (increase to 60 to 65 percent)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You may well be right on the details.
I have no particular opinion on exactly where the cutpoints should be or what the exact rates should be. Those would need adjustment to match revenue needs and to maximize perceptions of fairness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC