Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Frank: When Bill Clinton left office the military budget was 300 billion, it's now 700 billion.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:33 AM
Original message
Rep. Frank: When Bill Clinton left office the military budget was 300 billion, it's now 700 billion.
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 11:36 AM by onehandle
From 'The Last Word,' Monday night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. It must be inflation. Oh, wait, I am told there isn't inflation. I'm confused /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I still remember the RW memes and e-mail forwards
about how "weak" Clinton was making our war machine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Same memes have been recycled with Clinton crossed out and Obama scribbled in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they want to really make a dent in the budget they could end two needless wars
and cut the fat and waste at the Pentagon. It's time that the Defense budget stop being a sacred cow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. What I would give for Clinton era economy right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. You and me, Brother. You and me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ah yes, the good old days of deregulation, the dot.com bubble and Enron. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. well
The republicans have always been with us. Hence the burps and the shits.

Case is: Deflative Defense spending via Clinton lowered the debt/deficit.
Only a republican would argue otherwise, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Are you crediting the economic boom of the 90's to lower defense spending?
Yes, keeping defense spending down was a factor, but a relatively SMALL one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Debt/deficit reduction was good
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 12:35 PM by BeFree
It was a boost to the economy, yes. Instead of building missile guidance systems private money went to build citizen computer systems. And here we are.

Are you saying it had NO impact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. As I said above, a relatively small one.
But since we're talking about defense spending, it was roughly the same when Clinton came in as when he left, $350 billion dollars. Yes, great job to keep this spending down, but IMHO, you're grossly overestimating the impact of it if you're crediting the 90's economy to this in any significant proportion.

A far greater impact would be the financial shenanigans that companies began to engage in and the dot-com bubble where people were fighting to throw money over any internet start-up regardless of whether they'd even figured out how they were going to make money at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yup. Pets.com raised $82.5 million in an IPO only a mere 9 months before collapsing...
Hell, many people threw their money into these internet start-ups not actually knowing what the company did. In the late 90s, any idea seemed to be a good idea.

Even though many dot-coms were, in fact, awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Pets.com was exactly the one I was thinking of...
If I remember right, the only real tangible asset to come out of that was the sock puppet in the commercials, and they even got sued over that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Sock puppets can never die!
Sock puppets for Ponys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, I saw that
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. The wars need to end
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 12:01 PM by ProSense
Under even normal circumstances, the defense budget would have increased by a lot since 2000.

The most significant and uneccessary increase have are related to the two wars, reflected in the added cost of continuing them and caring for a lot of wounded soldiers. The military health systems budget has more than doubled:

<...>

The budget includes $52.5 billion for the Military Health System. The system, which has 9.6 million beneficiaries, has seen its budget more than double since fiscal 2001, when it was $19 billion.

link


President Obama reduced the war budget for 2012, but the budget still calls for $117 billion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. We have almost 800 - yep 800!! - military bases, not counting the war zones...
An eye-opening book is DISMANTLING THE EMPIRE by Chalmers Johnson - he challenges Pres. Obama to dismantle the mic.

Don't think this prez will do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. When dubya was selected, the military budget was $302 billion dollars a year.
The $700 billion dollar number cited does not include the cost if two ongoing occupations, nor the 'black' budget, nor the nuke budget.

If you lump all that crap together, we are spending one trillion dollars a year on the military. BTW, that one trillion dollars represents 58% of all discretionary funding. The interest on the National Debt is 7% of all discretionary funding.

And that's the reason LIHEAP, job training, teachers, police, firemen, and city and state budgets are all in the red. 65% is spent on useless crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badfish Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Are you sure ?
The $700 billion dollar number cited does not include the cost if two ongoing occupations

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. The total includes funding for the wars and it's
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 06:20 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badfish Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thats what I thought.
Do we really need the spin ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. And now the GOP is screaming about how we must cut "entitlements"
after they ran up this huge tab with war and "defense" spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bush made the military a giant jobs program
, and war itself is basically a repug-approved fiscal stimulus. The problem now is that drawing down the military budget immediately effects the jobs market and GDP, and (knowing how successfully the GOP can spin that) would just wind up with bigger problems in 2012...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. So did Reagan...
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 08:09 PM by Drunken Irishman
Much of Reagan's spending early in his administration was in defense building.

It's the big difference between Pres. Obama's spending and that of Reagan/Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. And Republican wonder WHY we have a massive debt
It's because they ran up the charge card and then left the tab for the American taxpayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC