Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone explain this? Subsidies don't kick in for years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:11 AM
Original message
Can someone explain this? Subsidies don't kick in for years
(3 in the House legislation, 4 in the Senate). When does the mandate take effect? How can you have the mandate before the subsidies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. so I gather no one knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Probably to give plenty of time for the subsidies to be repealed. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. that's hardly a useful response. I'm looking for real information, not speculation
there's plenty of the latter here, not so much of the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. The taxes to pay for it kick in immediately though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought the mandates and subsidies kick in at the same time
or even subsidies for a year and then the mandate starts. I'll look into it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. CBO does 10-year analysis on bills, and
to get the 10-year budget & deficit numbers to look acceptable, they need to collect taxes/fines for all 10 years, but can only pay subsidies for 6-7 of those years.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That is pretty deceptive
How disillusioning that we pull this crap too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. No, because it still decreases the deficit over the second decade, too
It takes a while for the cost savings to kick in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. To make sure that they can say the bill pays for itself over 10 years
They are playing accounting shell games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Playing shell games, and pretending voters won't notice.
This bill is such a mess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. The mandates don't kick in right away
The Kaiser Family Foundation has a good side-by-side analysis tool to compare both versions at the link.

According to their analysis for the House bill:

The penalty will be phased-in according to the following schedule: $95 in 2014, $495 in 2015, and $750 in 2016 for the flat fee or .5% of taxable income in 2014, 1.0% of taxable income in 2015, and 2% of taxable income in 2016. Beginning after 2016, the penalty will be increased annually by the cost-of-living adjustment.


For the Senate bill:

Require individuals to have "acceptable health coverage". Those without coverage pay a penalty of 2.5% of their adjusted income above the filing threshold up to the cost of the average national premium for self-only or family coverage under a basic plan in the Health Insurance Exchange. Exceptions granted for those with incomes below the filing threshold (in 2009 the threshold for taxpayers under age 65 is $9,350 for singles and $18,700 for couples), religious objections and financial hardship. (Effective January 1, 2013)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Your welcome
I would bookmark that page, their site has much good information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Do the subsidies also adjust with inflation/rate increases? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. From the same link above
for the Senate version:

Index the affordability premium credits after 2013 to maintain the ratio of government to enrollee shares of the premiums over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Mandates, subsidies and mandatory pre-existing condition coverage all kick in together.
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 11:34 AM by phleshdef
Between now and then is a ramp up period to allow everyone to prepare to accomodate all the changes. In the meanwhile, the government will be creating a high risk emergency pool to cover people with serious pre-existing conditions between now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Facts facts facts....
What is this a rerun of an old "Dragnet" episode?

Facts don't seem to matter anymore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC